These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35082468)

  • 1. FSA Angle: A Soft Tissue Approach for Assessing Sagittal Skeletal Discrepancy.
    Sreenivasagan S; Sivakumar A
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2021; 14(Suppl 1):S54-S56. PubMed ID: 35082468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tau Angle: A New Approach for Assessment of True Sagittal Maxillomandibular Relationship.
    Gupta P; Singh N; Tripathi T; Gopal R; Rai P
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020; 13(5):497-500. PubMed ID: 33623336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiographic Evaluation of the Hyoid Bone Position and Pharyngeal Airway Depth in Anteroposterior Dysplasia.
    Chauhan R; Bagga DK; Agrawal P; Kalra H; Kumar P; Singh A
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2019; 12(2):101-106. PubMed ID: 31571780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cephalometric and in vivo measurements of maxillomandibular anteroposterior discrepancies: a preliminary regression study.
    Ferrario VF; Serrao G; Ciusa V; Morini M; Sforza C
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Dec; 72(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 12518952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in Cranial Base Morphology in Class I and Class II Division 1 Malocclusions.
    Agarwal A; Pandey H; Bajaj K; Pandey L
    J Int Oral Health; 2013 Feb; 5(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 24155576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mount Vernon Index vs Yen Angle for Assessment of Anteroposterior Apical Jaw Base Relationship.
    Doshi JR; Jain P; Jain M; Rathore AS; Gaikwad RN; Nallamilli LS
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2021; 14(Suppl 1):S35-S38. PubMed ID: 35082464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of lateral photographic and radiographic sagittal analysis in relation to Angle's classification.
    Wasserstein A; Shpack N; Ben Yoseph Y; Geron S; Davidovitch M; Vardimon A
    J Orofac Orthop; 2015 Jul; 76(4):294-304. PubMed ID: 26123731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determination of Relationship between Lip Prints and Skeletal Malocclusion in Children of Age 9-14 Years.
    Allani S; Setty JV; Srinivasan I; Jawa A; Lalitya D
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2019; 12(6):494-499. PubMed ID: 32440062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bimaxillary surgery in Class III malocclusion: soft and hard tissue changes.
    Aydil B; Özer N; Marşan G
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Apr; 41(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 23182267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Facial soft tissue changes after maxillary impaction and mandibular advancement in high angle class II cases.
    Aydil B; Özer N; Marşan G
    Int J Med Sci; 2012; 9(4):316-21. PubMed ID: 22745571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic validity of different cephalometric analyses for assessment of the sagittal skeletal pattern.
    Ahmed M; Shaikh A; Fida M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2018; 23(5):75-81. PubMed ID: 30427496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of Beta angle in assessing true anteroposterior apical base discrepancy in different growth patterns.
    Sundareswaran S; Kumar V
    J Nat Sci Biol Med; 2015; 6(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 25810649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Overjet as a predictor of sagittal skeletal relationships.
    Zupancic S; Pohar M; Farcnik F; Ovsenik M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 30(3):269-73. PubMed ID: 18540015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. To Check the Reliability of Various Cephalometric Parameters used for Predicting the Type of Malocclusions and Growth Patterns.
    Pawar RO; Mane DR; Patil CD; Bhalerao SV; Parkar AF; Agarwal S
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2022 Jul; 14(Suppl 1):S808-S811. PubMed ID: 36110773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors affecting changes in soft tissue profile after various treatment modalities for skeletal Class II malocclusion: A cross-sectional study.
    Khan AR; Fida M; Sukhia RH
    Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):497-505. PubMed ID: 31257136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of Tongue Crib Combination Treating Severe Skeletal Angle Class III Malocclusion in Mixed Dentition.
    Zhao W; Chen Y; Kyung HM; Xu JS
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020; 13(6):668-676. PubMed ID: 33976494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Esthetic Outcome and Airway Evaluation following Bi-Jaw Surgery V/S Mandibular Setback Surgery in Skeletal Class III Malocclusion Using Surgery First Approach.
    Kanwal B; Shetty A; Mani V; Prashanth CS; Pramod KM; Arjunan S
    Ann Maxillofac Surg; 2018; 8(2):270-275. PubMed ID: 30693244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rugoscopy as a Gender Determination Tool and its Appositeness in Malocclusion among Adolescents Aged 13-18 Years.
    Lalitya D; Srinivasan I; Setty JV; Pamnani S; Dindukurthi MK; Allani S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2019; 12(4):307-311. PubMed ID: 31866716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Short-term hard and soft tissue changes after mandibular advancement surgery in Class II patients: a retrospective cephalometric study.
    Storms AS; Miclotte A; Grosjean L; Cadenas de Llano-Pérula M; Alqerban A; Fieuws S; Sun Y; Politis C; Verdonck A; Willems G
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Oct; 39(5):567-576. PubMed ID: 28204270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new approach of assessing sagittal discrepancies: the Beta angle.
    Baik CY; Ververidou M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jul; 126(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 15224065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.