BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35082845)

  • 1. A Novel Intelligent Approach to Lane-Change Behavior Prediction for Intelligent and Connected Vehicles.
    Du L; Chen W; Ji J; Pei Z; Tong B; Zheng H
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():9516218. PubMed ID: 35082845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Learning-Based Lane-Change Behaviour Detection for Intelligent and Connected Vehicles.
    Du L; Chen W; Pei Z; Zheng H; Fu S; Chen K; Wu D
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2020; 2020():8848363. PubMed ID: 33061950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A co-evolutionary lane-changing trajectory planning method for automated vehicles based on the instantaneous risk identification.
    Wu J; Chen X; Bie Y; Zhou W
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Feb; 180():106907. PubMed ID: 36455450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Collision-avoidance lane change control method for enhancing safety for connected vehicle platoon in mixed traffic environment.
    Ma Y; Liu Q; Fu J; Liufu K; Li Q
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 May; 184():106999. PubMed ID: 36780868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Coordinated Decision Control of Lane-Change and Car-Following for Intelligent Vehicle Based on Time Series Prediction and Deep Reinforcement Learning.
    Zhang K; Pu T; Zhang Q; Nie Z
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Jan; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 38257495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Key feature selection and risk prediction for lane-changing behaviors based on vehicles' trajectory data.
    Chen T; Shi X; Wong YD
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():156-169. PubMed ID: 31150922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detecting lane change maneuvers using SHRP2 naturalistic driving data: A comparative study machine learning techniques.
    Das A; Khan MN; Ahmed MM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Jul; 142():105578. PubMed ID: 32408143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Support Vector Machine Based Lane-Changing Behavior Recognition and Lateral Trajectory Prediction.
    Feng Y; Yan X
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():3632333. PubMed ID: 35592714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multi-Modal Vehicle Trajectory Prediction by Collaborative Learning of Lane Orientation, Vehicle Interaction, and Intention.
    Tian W; Wang S; Wang Z; Wu M; Zhou S; Bi X
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jun; 22(11):. PubMed ID: 35684916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Time-Series-Based Personalized Lane-Changing Decision-Making Model.
    Ye M; Pu L; Li P; Lu X; Liu Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(17):. PubMed ID: 36081119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interactive Lane Keeping System for Autonomous Vehicles Using LSTM-RNN Considering Driving Environments.
    Jeong Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 22(24):. PubMed ID: 36560257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short-term prediction of safety and operation impacts of lane changes in oscillations with empirical vehicle trajectories.
    Li M; Li Z; Xu C; Liu T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Feb; 135():105345. PubMed ID: 31751785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. End-to-End Automated Lane-Change Maneuvering Considering Driving Style Using a Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient Algorithm.
    Hu H; Lu Z; Wang Q; Zheng C
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Sep; 20(18):. PubMed ID: 32971987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multi-vehicle interaction safety of connected automated vehicles in merging area: A real-time risk assessment approach.
    Zhu J; Ma Y; Lou Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Mar; 166():106546. PubMed ID: 34965492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new method of temporal and spatial risk estimation for lane change considering conventional recognition defects.
    Wu J; Wen H; Qi W
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105796. PubMed ID: 33099126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lane change warning threshold based on driver perception characteristics.
    Wang C; Sun Q; Fu R; Li Z; Zhang Q
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():164-174. PubMed ID: 29704793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Human-Like Lane Change Decision Model for Autonomous Vehicles that Considers the Risk Perception of Drivers in Mixed Traffic.
    Wang C; Sun Q; Li Z; Zhang H
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Apr; 20(8):. PubMed ID: 32316210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An integrated architecture for intelligence evaluation of automated vehicles.
    Huang H; Zheng X; Yang Y; Liu J; Liu W; Wang J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Sep; 145():105681. PubMed ID: 32712190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Research on Vehicle Trajectory Deviation Characteristics on Freeways Using Natural Driving Trajectory Data.
    Dai Z; Pan C; Xiong W; Ding R; Zhang H; Xu J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Nov; 19(22):. PubMed ID: 36429411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A proactive lane-changing risk prediction framework considering driving intention recognition and different lane-changing patterns.
    Shangguan Q; Fu T; Wang J; Fang S; Fu L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Jan; 164():106500. PubMed ID: 34823098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.