205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35084840)
1. Data-Driven Machine Learning in Environmental Pollution: Gains and Problems.
Liu X; Lu D; Zhang A; Liu Q; Jiang G
Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Feb; 56(4):2124-2133. PubMed ID: 35084840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spatial prediction of PM
Bozdağ A; Dokuz Y; Gökçek ÖB
Environ Pollut; 2020 Aug; 263(Pt A):114635. PubMed ID: 33618491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating heterogeneity in indoor and outdoor air pollution using land-use regression and constrained factor analysis.
Levy JI; Clougherty JE; Baxter LK; Houseman EA; Paciorek CJ;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2010 Dec; (152):5-80; discussion 81-91. PubMed ID: 21409949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The application of machine learning to air pollution research: A bibliometric analysis.
Li Y; Sha Z; Tang A; Goulding K; Liu X
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2023 Jun; 257():114911. PubMed ID: 37154080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of linear regression, regularization, and machine learning algorithms to develop Europe-wide spatial models of fine particles and nitrogen dioxide.
Chen J; de Hoogh K; Gulliver J; Hoffmann B; Hertel O; Ketzel M; Bauwelinck M; van Donkelaar A; Hvidtfeldt UA; Katsouyanni K; Janssen NAH; Martin RV; Samoli E; Schwartz PE; Stafoggia M; Bellander T; Strak M; Wolf K; Vienneau D; Vermeulen R; Brunekreef B; Hoek G
Environ Int; 2019 Sep; 130():104934. PubMed ID: 31229871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Part 1. Statistical Learning Methods for the Effects of Multiple Air Pollution Constituents.
Coull BA; Bobb JF; Wellenius GA; Kioumourtzoglou MA; Mittleman MA; Koutrakis P; Godleski JJ
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):5-50. PubMed ID: 26333238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pollution and Weather Reports: Using Machine Learning for Combating Pollution in Big Cities.
Popa CL; Dobrescu TG; Silvestru CI; Firulescu AC; Popescu CA; Cotet CE
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Nov; 21(21):. PubMed ID: 34770634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Machine Learning and Land Use Regression for fine scale spatiotemporal estimation of ambient air pollution: Modeling ozone concentrations across the contiguous United States.
Ren X; Mi Z; Georgopoulos PG
Environ Int; 2020 Sep; 142():105827. PubMed ID: 32593834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A land use regression model using machine learning and locally developed low cost particulate matter sensors in Uganda.
Coker ES; Amegah AK; Mwebaze E; Ssematimba J; Bainomugisha E
Environ Res; 2021 Aug; 199():111352. PubMed ID: 34043968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of Air Pollutants Concentration Based on an Extreme Learning Machine: The Case of Hong Kong.
Zhang J; Ding W
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Jan; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 28125034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Advantages and challenges of the implementation of a low-cost particulate matter monitoring system as a decision-making tool.
Caquilpán P V; Aros G G; Elgueta A S; Díaz S R; Sepúlveda K G; Sierralta J C
Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Oct; 191(11):667. PubMed ID: 31650385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A systematic review of data mining and machine learning for air pollution epidemiology.
Bellinger C; Mohomed Jabbar MS; Zaïane O; Osornio-Vargas A
BMC Public Health; 2017 Nov; 17(1):907. PubMed ID: 29179711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Machine learning models accurately predict ozone exposure during wildfire events.
Watson GL; Telesca D; Reid CE; Pfister GG; Jerrett M
Environ Pollut; 2019 Nov; 254(Pt A):112792. PubMed ID: 31421571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High-spatial resolution ground-level ozone in Yunnan, China: A spatiotemporal estimation based on comparative analyses of machine learning models.
Man X; Liu R; Zhang Y; Yu W; Kong F; Liu L; Luo Y; Feng T
Environ Res; 2024 Jun; 251(Pt 1):118609. PubMed ID: 38442812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. LaSVM-based big data learning system for dynamic prediction of air pollution in Tehran.
Ghaemi Z; Alimohammadi A; Farnaghi M
Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Apr; 190(5):300. PubMed ID: 29679160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Air quality prediction using CNN+LSTM-based hybrid deep learning architecture.
Gilik A; Ogrenci AS; Ozmen A
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Feb; 29(8):11920-11938. PubMed ID: 34554404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of machine learning techniques with multiple remote sensing datasets in estimating monthly concentrations of ground-level PM
Xu Y; Ho HC; Wong MS; Deng C; Shi Y; Chan TC; Knudby A
Environ Pollut; 2018 Nov; 242(Pt B):1417-1426. PubMed ID: 30142557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Selecting Data Analytic and Modeling Methods to Support Air Pollution and Environmental Justice Investigations: A Critical Review and Guidance Framework.
Gardner-Frolick R; Boyd D; Giang A
Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Mar; 56(5):2843-2860. PubMed ID: 35133145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of the congestion charging scheme on air quality in London. Part 1. Emissions modeling and analysis of air pollution measurements.
Kelly F; Anderson HR; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Barratt B; Beevers S; Derwent D; Green D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Apr; (155):5-71. PubMed ID: 21830496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
