123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35084923)
1. Quantifying the regularities between orthography and semantics and their impact on group- and individual-level behavior.
Siegelman N; Rueckl JG; Lo JCM; Kearns DM; Morris RD; Compton DL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Jun; 48(6):839-855. PubMed ID: 35084923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Individual differences in learning the regularities between orthography, phonology and semantics predict early reading skills.
Siegelman N; Rueckl JG; Steacy LM; Frost SJ; van den Bunt M; Zevin JD; Seidenberg MS; Pugh KR; Compton DL; Morris RD
J Mem Lang; 2020 Oct; 114():. PubMed ID: 32694882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using information-theoretic measures to characterize the structure of the writing system: the case of orthographic-phonological regularities in English.
Siegelman N; Kearns DM; Rueckl JG
Behav Res Methods; 2020 Jun; 52(3):1292-1312. PubMed ID: 31950361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A database of orthography-semantics consistency (OSC) estimates for 15,017 English words.
Marelli M; Amenta S
Behav Res Methods; 2018 Aug; 50(4):1482-1495. PubMed ID: 29372490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Beyond the visual word form area: the orthography-semantics interface in spelling and reading.
Purcell JJ; Shea J; Rapp B
Cogn Neuropsychol; 2014; 31(5-6):482-510. PubMed ID: 24833190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Very early and late form-to-meaning computations during visual word recognition as revealed by electrophysiology.
Sulpizio S; Arcara G; Lago S; Marelli M; Amenta S
Cortex; 2022 Dec; 157():167-193. PubMed ID: 36327746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implicit Learning of Written Regularities and Its Relation to Literacy Acquisition in a Shallow Orthography.
Nigro L; Jiménez-Fernández G; Simpson IC; Defior S
J Psycholinguist Res; 2015 Oct; 44(5):571-85. PubMed ID: 24935792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Semantic transparency in free stems: The effect of Orthography-Semantics Consistency on word recognition.
Marelli M; Amenta S; Crepaldi D
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(8):1571-83. PubMed ID: 25269473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consistency measures individuate dissociating semantic modulations in priming paradigms: A new look on semantics in the processing of (complex) words.
Amenta S; Crepaldi D; Marelli M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Oct; 73(10):1546-1563. PubMed ID: 32419617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cognitive flexibility predicts early reading skills.
Colé P; Duncan LG; Blaye A
Front Psychol; 2014; 5():565. PubMed ID: 24966842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Print-, sublexical and lexical processing in children with reading and/or spelling deficits: An ERP study.
Kemény F; Banfi C; Gangl M; Perchtold CM; Papousek I; Moll K; Landerl K
Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Aug; 130():53-62. PubMed ID: 29803515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A word or two about nonwords: Frequency, semantic neighborhood density, and orthography-to-semantics consistency effects for nonwords in the lexical decision task.
Hendrix P; Sun CC
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Jan; 47(1):157-183. PubMed ID: 31999159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of context on processing words during sentence reading among adults varying in age and literacy skill.
Steen-Baker AA; Ng S; Payne BR; Anderson CJ; Federmeier KD; Stine-Morrow EAL
Psychol Aging; 2017 Aug; 32(5):460-472. PubMed ID: 28816473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction at the intersection of sentence context and word form: Evidence from eye-movements and self-paced reading.
Amenta S; Hasenäcker J; Crepaldi D; Marelli M
Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Jun; 30(3):1081-1092. PubMed ID: 36510092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Morphological awareness as a function of semantics, phonology, and orthography and as a predictor of reading comprehension in Chinese.
Li H; Dronjic V; Chen XI; Li Y; Cheng Y; Wu X
J Child Lang; 2017 Sep; 44(5):1218-1247. PubMed ID: 27846917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Print-sound regularities are more important than print-meaning regularities in the initial stages of learning to read: Response to Bowers & Bowers (2018).
Rastle K; Taylor JSH
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jul; 71(7):1501-1505. PubMed ID: 29741458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Relationship Between Non-Orthographic Language Abilities and Reading Performance in Chronic Aphasia: An Exploration of the Primary Systems Hypothesis.
Madden EB; Conway T; Henry ML; Spencer KA; Yorkston KM; Kendall DL
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 61(12):3038-3054. PubMed ID: 30515520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diversity matters: The sensitivity to sublexical orthographic regularities increases with contextual diversity.
Chetail F; Sauval K
Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Jun; 29(3):1003-1016. PubMed ID: 34877636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The contribution of orthography to spoken word production: evidence from Mandarin Chinese.
Bi Y; Wei T; Janssen N; Han Z
Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Jun; 16(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 19451384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Neurocognitive mechanisms of learning to read: print tuning in beginning readers related to word-reading fluency and semantics but not phonology.
Eberhard-Moscicka AK; Jost LB; Raith M; Maurer U
Dev Sci; 2015 Jan; 18(1):106-18. PubMed ID: 24863157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
