127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35085123)
1. Characterizing Scatter Correction Software of 5 Mobile Radiography Units: An Anthropomorphic Phantom Study.
Gossye T; Buytaert D; Smeets PV; Morbée L; Vereecke E; Achten E; Bacher K
Invest Radiol; 2022 Jul; 57(7):444-452. PubMed ID: 35085123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Virtual Grid Processed Clinical Chest Radiographs.
Gossye T; Buytaert D; Smeets PV; Morbée L; De Wilde C; Vermeiren K; Achten E; Bacher K
Invest Radiol; 2022 Sep; 57(9):585-591. PubMed ID: 35438670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of Software Parameter Settings on Image Quality of Virtual Grid Processed Radiography Images: A Contrast-Detail Phantom Study.
Gossye T; Smeets PV; Achten E; Bacher K
Invest Radiol; 2020 Jun; 55(6):374-380. PubMed ID: 31985603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of Virtual Grid processed clinical pelvic radiographs.
Gossye T; Buytaert D; Smeets PV; Morbée L; Vereecke E; Kellens PJ; Achten E; Bacher K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Jun; 25(6):e14353. PubMed ID: 38693646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of X-ray scatter correction software on abdomen radiography in terms of image quality and radiation dose.
Sayed M; Knapp KM; Fulford J; Heales C; Alqahtani SJ
Radiography (Lond); 2024 May; 30(4):1125-1135. PubMed ID: 38797045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. EVALUATION OF DOSE REDUCTION POTENTIALS OF A NOVEL SCATTER CORRECTION SOFTWARE FOR BEDSIDE CHEST X-RAY IMAGING.
Renger B; Brieskorn C; Toth V; Mentrup D; Jockel S; Lohöfer F; Schwarz M; Rummeny EJ; Noël PB
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):60-7. PubMed ID: 26977074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automated quality control assessment of clinical chest images.
Willis CE; Nishino TK; Wells JR; Ai HA; Wilson JM; Samei E
Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4377-4391. PubMed ID: 30053326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ITERATIVE SCATTER CORRECTION FOR GRID-LESS BEDSIDE CHEST RADIOGRAPHY: PERFORMANCE FOR A CHEST PHANTOM.
Mentrup D; Jockel S; Menser B; Neitzel U
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):308-12. PubMed ID: 26487750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of scatter rejection and low-contrast performance of scan equalization digital radiography (SEDR), slot-scan digital radiography, and full-field digital radiography systems for chest phantom imaging.
Liu X; Shaw CC; Lai CJ; Wang T
Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 21361171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of dose reduction potential in scatter-corrected bedside chest radiography using U-net.
Onodera S; Lee Y; Tanaka Y
Radiol Phys Technol; 2020 Dec; 13(4):336-347. PubMed ID: 32986183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improved image quality of cone beam CT scans for radiotherapy image guidance using fiber-interspaced antiscatter grid.
Stankovic U; van Herk M; Ploeger LS; Sonke JJ
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061910. PubMed ID: 24877821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CAN SCATTER CORRECTION SOFTWARE REPLACE A GRID IN DR PELVIC EXAMINATIONS?
Precht H; Mørup SD; Tingberg A; Outzen CB; Kusk KW; Nielsen RM; Midtgård M; Winther MB; Waaler D; Kusk MW
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 187(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 31111927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High-ratio grid considerations in mobile chest radiography.
Scott AW; Gauntt DM; Yester MV; Barnes GT
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3142-53. PubMed ID: 22755699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigating the use of an antiscatter grid in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system.
Moore CS; Wood TJ; Avery G; Balcam S; Needler L; Smith A; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
Br J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 88(1047):20140613. PubMed ID: 25571914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An image-based technique to assess the perceptual quality of clinical chest radiographs.
Lin Y; Luo H; Dobbins JT; Page McAdams H; Wang X; Sehnert WJ; Barski L; Foos DH; Samei E
Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):7019-31. PubMed ID: 23127093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anthropomorphic versus geometric chest phantoms: a comparison of scatter properties.
Baydush AH; Ghem WC; Floyd CE
Med Phys; 2000 May; 27(5):894-7. PubMed ID: 10841391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gridless adult cervical spine radiography and its' effect on image quality and radiation dose: A phantom study.
Mekis N; Bianchi T; Doyle C; Gauchat M; Geerling I; Linneman J; Staats S; Campeanu C
Radiography (Lond); 2024 Jan; 30(1):359-366. PubMed ID: 38141429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A phantom study on dose efficiency for orthopedic applications: Comparing slot-scanning radiography using ultra-small-angle tomosynthesis to conventional radiography.
Luckner C; Weber T; Herbst M; Ritschl L; Kappler S; Maier A
Med Phys; 2021 May; 48(5):2170-2184. PubMed ID: 33368397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dose-image quality optimisation in digital chest radiography.
Doyle P; Martin CJ; Gentle D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):269-72. PubMed ID: 15933120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
