These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35085596)
1. Economics of sedentary behaviour: A systematic review of cost of illness, cost-effectiveness, and return on investment studies. Nguyen P; Le LK; Ananthapavan J; Gao L; Dunstan DW; Moodie M Prev Med; 2022 Mar; 156():106964. PubMed ID: 35085596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effectiveness of sedentary behaviour interventions on sitting time and screen time in children and adults: an umbrella review of systematic reviews. Nguyen P; Le LK; Nguyen D; Gao L; Dunstan DW; Moodie M Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2020 Sep; 17(1):117. PubMed ID: 32958052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sedentary behaviour interventions in offices to reduce sitting time in Australian desk-based workers: A modelling study. Nguyen P; Ananthapavan J; Gao L; Dunstan DW; Moodie M PLoS One; 2023; 18(6):e0287710. PubMed ID: 37384626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evidence base of economic evaluations of workplace-based interventions reducing occupational sitting time: an integrative review. Akhavan Rad S; Kiwanuka F; Korpelainen R; Torkki P BMJ Open; 2022 Jun; 12(6):e060139. PubMed ID: 35772822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors impacting workplace investment in sit-stand workstations from the perspective of purchasing decision-makers. Zerguine H; Goode AD; Abbott A; Johnston V; Healy GN Appl Ergon; 2022 Jan; 98():103558. PubMed ID: 34411850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sedentary behaviour in the workplace: prevalence, health implications and interventions. Bailey DP Br Med Bull; 2021 Mar; 137(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 33710270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are Office-Based Workplace Interventions Designed to Reduce Sitting Time Cost-Effective Primary Prevention Measures for Cardiovascular Disease? A Systematic Review and Modelled Economic Evaluation. Gao L; Nguyen P; Dunstan D; Moodie M Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Mar; 16(5):. PubMed ID: 30866495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modelling the potential health and economic benefits of reducing population sitting time in Australia. Nguyen P; Ananthapavan J; Tan EJ; Crosland P; Bowe SJ; Gao L; Dunstan DW; Moodie M Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2022 Mar; 19(1):28. PubMed ID: 35305678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost and cost-effectiveness of the 'Stand and Move at Work' multicomponent intervention to reduce workplace sedentary time and cardiometabolic risk. Michaud TL; You W; Estabrooks PA; Leonard K; Rydell SA; Mullane SL; Pereira MA; Buman MP Scand J Work Environ Health; 2022 Jul; 48(5):399-409. PubMed ID: 35333373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-Effectiveness and Return-on-Investment of the Dynamic Work Intervention Compared With Usual Practice to Reduce Sedentary Behavior. Ben ÂJ; Jelsma JGM; Renaud LR; Huysmans MA; van Nassau F; van der Beek AJ; van der Ploeg HP; van Dongen JM; Bosmans JE J Occup Environ Med; 2020 Aug; 62(8):e449-e456. PubMed ID: 32541620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Dynamic Work study: study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial of an occupational health intervention aimed at reducing sitting time in office workers. Jelsma JGM; Renaud LR; Huysmans MA; Coffeng JK; Loyen A; van Nassau F; Bosmans JE; Speklé EM; van der Beek AJ; van der Ploeg HP BMC Public Health; 2019 Feb; 19(1):188. PubMed ID: 30760231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of exercise referral schemes enhanced by self-management strategies to battle sedentary behaviour in older adults: protocol for an economic evaluation alongside the SITLESS three-armed pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Deidda M; Coll-Planas L; Giné-Garriga M; Guerra-Balic M; Roqué I Figuls M; Tully MA; Caserotti P; Rothenbacher D; Salvà Casanovas A; Kee F; Blackburn NE; Wilson JJ; Skjødt M; Denkinger M; Wirth K; McIntosh E; BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e022266. PubMed ID: 30327403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The user and non-user perspective: Experiences of office workers with long-term access to sit-stand workstations. Renaud LR; Speklé EM; van der Beek AJ; van der Ploeg HP; Pasman HR; Huysmans MA PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0236582. PubMed ID: 32722696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of interventions for reducing non-occupational sedentary behaviour in adults and older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Shrestha N; Grgic J; Wiesner G; Parker A; Podnar H; Bennie JA; Biddle SJH; Pedisic Z Br J Sports Med; 2019 Oct; 53(19):1206-1213. PubMed ID: 29331992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Systematic review of process evaluations of interventions in trials investigating sedentary behaviour in adults. Johansson JF; Lam N; Ozer S; Hall J; Morton S; English C; Fitzsimons CF; Lawton R; Forster A; Clarke D BMJ Open; 2022 Jan; 12(1):e053945. PubMed ID: 35105631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What strategies do desk-based workers choose to reduce sitting time and how well do they work? Findings from a cluster randomised controlled trial. Stephens SK; Eakin EG; Clark BK; Winkler EAH; Owen N; LaMontagne AD; Moodie M; Lawler SP; Dunstan DW; Healy GN Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2018 Oct; 15(1):98. PubMed ID: 30314505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stand Out in Class: restructuring the classroom environment to reduce sitting time - findings from a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial. Clemes SA; Bingham DD; Pearson N; Chen YL; Edwardson CL; McEachan RRC; Tolfrey K; Cale L; Richardson G; Fray M; Altunkaya J; Bandelow S; Jaicim NB; Salmon J; Dunstan DW; Barber SE Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2020 Apr; 17(1):55. PubMed ID: 32349761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]