240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35085633)
1. Differing perceptions of the youth and the elderly regarding cultural ecosystem services in urban parks: An exploration of the tour experience.
Zhang K; Tang X; Zhao Y; Huang B; Huang L; Liu M; Luo E; Li Y; Jiang T; Zhang L; Wang Y; Wan J
Sci Total Environ; 2022 May; 821():153388. PubMed ID: 35085633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How do landscape patterns in urban parks affect multiple cultural ecosystem services perceived by residents?
Bi X; Gan X; Jiang Z; Li Z; Li J
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Jun; 946():174255. PubMed ID: 38925389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Environmental and socioeconomic factors influencing the use of urban green spaces in Coimbra (Portugal).
Pinto L; Ferreira CSS; Pereira P
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Oct; 792():148293. PubMed ID: 34147815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating Cultural Ecosystem Services of Urban Residential Green Spaces From the Perspective of Residents' Satisfaction With Green Space.
Mao Q; Wang L; Guo Q; Li Y; Liu M; Xu G
Front Public Health; 2020; 8():226. PubMed ID: 32766190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A demand index for recreational ecosystem services associated with urban parks in Beijing, China.
Sun R; Li F; Chen L
J Environ Manage; 2019 Dec; 251():109612. PubMed ID: 31563053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The benefits and disbenefits associated with cultural ecosystem services of urban green spaces.
Nowak-Olejnik A; Działek J; Hibner J; Liro J; Madej R; Sudmanns M; Haase D
Sci Total Environ; 2024 May; 926():172092. PubMed ID: 38556014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ecosystem services: Urban parks under a magnifying glass.
Mexia T; Vieira J; Príncipe A; Anjos A; Silva P; Lopes N; Freitas C; Santos-Reis M; Correia O; Branquinho C; Pinho P
Environ Res; 2018 Jan; 160():469-478. PubMed ID: 29078140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Discover the Desirable Landscape Structure of Urban Parks for Mitigating Urban Heat: A High Spatial Resolution Study Using a Forest City, Luoyang, China as a Lens.
Zhang K; Yun G; Song P; Wang K; Li A; Du C; Jia X; Feng Y; Wu M; Qu K; Zhu X; Ge S
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Feb; 20(4):. PubMed ID: 36833848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Disparity in Perceptions of Social Values for Ecosystem Services of Urban Green Space: A Case Study in the East Lake Scenic Area, Wuhan.
Chen Y; Ke X; Min M; Cheng P
Front Public Health; 2020; 8():370. PubMed ID: 33117766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Creating a Healthy Environment for Elderly People in Urban Public Activity Space.
Shan W; Xiu C; Ji R
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Oct; 17(19):. PubMed ID: 33036270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Usage behavior and health benefit perception of youth in urban parks: A case study from Qingdao, China.
Yao W; Yun J; Zhang Y; Meng T; Mu Z
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():923671. PubMed ID: 35991033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Understanding different cultural ecosystem services: An exploration of rural landscape preferences based on geographic and social media data.
Li Y; Xie L; Zhang L; Huang L; Lin Y; Su Y; AmirReza S; He S; Zhu C; Li S; Gan M; Huang L; Wang K; Zhang J; Chen X
J Environ Manage; 2022 Sep; 317():115487. PubMed ID: 35751282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vegetation management for urban park visitors: a mixed methods approach in Portland, Oregon.
Talal ML; Santelmann MV
Ecol Appl; 2020 Jun; 30(4):e02079. PubMed ID: 31972064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evaluation of ecosystem cultural services of urban protected areas based on public participation GIS (PPGIS): A case study of Gongqing Forest Park in Shanghai, China].
Peng WT; Liu WQ; Cai WB; Wang X; Huang Z; Wu CZ
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2019 Feb; 30(2):439-448. PubMed ID: 30915794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An SCM-G2SFCA Model for Studying Spatial Accessibility of Urban Parks.
Zhou Z; Zhang X; Li M; Wang X
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Dec; 20(1):. PubMed ID: 36613037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on cultural ecosystem services from urban green spaces: a case from English Bazar Urban Agglomeration, Eastern India.
Das A; Das M; Saha S; Pereira P
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 May; 30(24):65933-65946. PubMed ID: 37093391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Assessment of the social values of ecosystem services based on SolVES model: A case study of Wusong Paotaiwan Wetland Forest Park, Shanghai, China.].
Wang Y; Fu BT; Lyu YP; Yang K; Che Y
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2016 Jun; 27(6):1767-1774. PubMed ID: 29737682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Exploring the role of nature-based typologies and stewardship schemes in enhancing urban green spaces: Citizen perceptions of landscape design scenarios and ecosystem services.
McCarthy LJ; Russo A
J Environ Manage; 2023 Nov; 346():118944. PubMed ID: 37738726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. COVID-19 pandemic changes the recreational use of Moscow parks in space and time: Outcomes from crowd-sourcing and machine learning.
Matasov V; Vasenev V; Matasov D; Dvornikov Y; Filyushkina A; Bubalo M; Nakhaev M; Konstantinova A
Urban For Urban Green; 2023 May; 83():127911. PubMed ID: 36987409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Research on the Vitality Evaluation of Parks and Squares in Medium-Sized Chinese Cities from the Perspective of Urban Functional Areas.
Wang T; Li Y; Li H; Chen S; Li H; Zhang Y
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Nov; 19(22):. PubMed ID: 36429965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
