These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35085805)

  • 1. Evaluation of the Outcomes of Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared with Conventional Fusion Operations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Lin GX; Yao ZK; Zhang X; Chen CM; Rui G; Hu BS
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Apr; 160():55-66. PubMed ID: 35085805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a retrospective observational study.
    Chen H; Zheng G; Bian Z; Hou C; Li M; Zhang Z; Zhu L; Wang X
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 May; 18(1):389. PubMed ID: 37245051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of surgical invasiveness, hidden blood loss, and clinical outcome between unilateral biportal endoscopic and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a retrospective cohort study.
    Huang X; Wang W; Chen G; Guan X; Zhou Y; Tang Y
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Apr; 24(1):274. PubMed ID: 37038129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Kou Y; Chang J; Guan X; Chang Q; Feng H
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Aug; 152():e352-e368. PubMed ID: 34087465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using the biportal endoscopic techniques versus microscopic tubular technique.
    Kang MS; You KH; Choi JY; Heo DH; Chung HJ; Park HJ
    Spine J; 2021 Dec; 21(12):2066-2077. PubMed ID: 34171465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Short-term clinical efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Han H; Song Y; Li Y; Zhou H; Fu Y; Li J
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Sep; 18(1):656. PubMed ID: 37667363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review.
    Goldstein CL; Macwan K; Sundararajan K; Rampersaud YR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):416-27. PubMed ID: 26565767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Complications Between Percutaneous Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Zhu L; Cai T; Shan Y; Zhang W; Zhang L; Feng X
    Pain Physician; 2021 Sep; 24(6):441-452. PubMed ID: 34554684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Preliminary clinical outcomes between percutaneous endoscopic and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases in a tertiary hospital: Is percutaneous endoscopic procedure superior to MIS-TLIF? A prospective cohort study.
    Ao S; Zheng W; Wu J; Tang Y; Zhang C; Zhou Y; Li C
    Int J Surg; 2020 Apr; 76():136-143. PubMed ID: 32165279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with a Tubular Retractor System: A Retrospective Controlled Study.
    Wang JC; Cao Z; Li ZZ; Zhao HL; Hou SX
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Sep; 165():e457-e468. PubMed ID: 35752422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparison of effectiveness between percutaneous coaxial large-channel endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion and minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis].
    Liu J; Kong Q; Feng P; Zhang B; Ma J; Hu Y; Wu X; Shu X; Pu C
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 36(6):681-690. PubMed ID: 35712924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing the efficacy and complications of unilateral biportal endoscopic fusion versus minimally invasive fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and mate-analysis.
    Wang Q; Chang S; Dong JF; Fang X; Chen Y; Zhuo C
    Eur Spine J; 2023 Apr; 32(4):1345-1357. PubMed ID: 36867251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive tubular transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease].
    Kong F; Zhou Q; Qiao Y; Wang W; Zhang C; Pan Q; Zhu H
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 May; 36(5):592-599. PubMed ID: 35570634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion enhanced the recovery of patients with the lumbar degenerative disease compared with the conventional posterior procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yang H; Cheng F; Hai Y; Liu Y; Pan A
    Front Neurol; 2022; 13():1089981. PubMed ID: 36703632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fully endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion using a percutaneous unilateral biportal endoscopic technique: technical note and preliminary clinical results.
    Heo DH; Son SK; Eum JH; Park CK
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E8. PubMed ID: 28760038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Full-Endoscopic Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Via an Interlaminar Approach Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Preliminary Retrospective Study.
    Li Y; Dai Y; Wang B; Li L; Li P; Xu J; Jiang B; Lü G
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Dec; 144():e475-e482. PubMed ID: 32891847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Fusion Rate and Clinical Outcomes in Minimally Invasive and Conventional Posterior Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis.
    Ren BW; Zhao HM; Wu JH; An BC; Han ZC; Liu YH; Mao KY; Liu JH
    World Neurosurg; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38871284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Time Course Observation of Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Lin GX; Park CK; Hur JW; Kim JS
    Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 2019 Jun; 59(6):222-230. PubMed ID: 31068542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis.
    Zhang QY; Tan J; Huang K; Xie HQ
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Sep; 22(1):802. PubMed ID: 34537023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus conventional interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yu Q; Lu HG; Pan XK; Shen ZH; Ren P; Hu XQ
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Oct; 24(1):838. PubMed ID: 37875873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.