159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35086073)
1. Evaluation of the impact of a scanner prototype on proton CT and helium CT image quality and dose efficiency with Monte Carlo simulation.
Götz S; Dickmann J; Rit S; Krah N; Khellaf F; Schulte RW; Parodi K; Dedes G; Landry G
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Feb; 67(5):. PubMed ID: 35086073
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Helium CT: Monte Carlo simulation results for an ideal source and detector with comparison to proton CT.
Piersimoni P; Faddegon BA; Méndez JR; Schulte RW; Volz L; Seco J
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3264-3274. PubMed ID: 29727481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The accuracy of helium ion CT based particle therapy range prediction: an experimental study comparing different particle and x-ray CT modalities.
Volz L; Collins-Fekete CA; Bär E; Brons S; Graeff C; Johnson RP; Runz A; Sarosiek C; Schulte RW; Seco J
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Nov; 66(23):. PubMed ID: 34706355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of secondary fragments on the image quality of helium ion imaging.
Volz L; Piersimoni P; Bashkirov VA; Brons S; Collins-Fekete CA; Johnson RP; Schulte RW; Seco J
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Oct; 63(19):195016. PubMed ID: 30183679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative accuracy and resolution assessment of two prototype proton computed tomography scanners.
Dedes G; Drosten H; Götz S; Dickmann J; Sarosiek C; Pankuch M; Krah N; Rit S; Bashkirov V; Schulte RW; Johnson RP; Parodi K; DeJongh E; Landry G
Med Phys; 2022 Jul; 49(7):4671-4681. PubMed ID: 35396739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of beam purity and scanner complexity on proton CT accuracy.
Piersimoni P; Ramos-Méndez J; Geoghegan T; Bashkirov VA; Schulte RW; Faddegon BA
Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):284-298. PubMed ID: 28066887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experimental comparison of proton CT and dual energy x-ray CT for relative stopping power estimation in proton therapy.
Dedes G; Dickmann J; Niepel K; Wesp P; Johnson RP; Pankuch M; Bashkirov V; Rit S; Volz L; Schulte RW; Landry G; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 64(16):165002. PubMed ID: 31220814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Experimental comparison of photon versus particle computed tomography to predict tissue relative stopping powers.
Bär E; Volz L; Collins-Fekete CA; Brons S; Runz A; Schulte RW; Seco J
Med Phys; 2022 Jan; 49(1):474-487. PubMed ID: 34709667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stopping power accuracy and achievable spatial resolution of helium ion imaging using a prototype particle CT detector system.
Volz L; Collins-Fekete CA; Piersimoni P; Johnson RP; Bashkirov V; Schulte R; Seco J
Curr Dir Biomed Eng; 2017 Sep; 3(2):401-404. PubMed ID: 36258816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterization of the INFN proton CT scanner for cross-calibration of x-ray CT.
Fogazzi E; Trevisan D; Farace P; Righetto R; Rit S; Scaringella M; Bruzzi M; Tommasino F; Civinini C
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Jun; 68(12):. PubMed ID: 37201529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Relative stopping power resolution in time-of-flight proton CT.
Krah N; Dauvergne D; Létang JM; Rit S; Testa É
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Aug; 67(16):. PubMed ID: 35603758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A likelihood-based particle imaging filter using prior information.
Fullarton R; Volz L; Dikaios N; Schulte R; Royle G; Evans PM; Seco J; Collins-Fekete CA
Med Phys; 2023 Apr; 50(4):2336-2353. PubMed ID: 36727634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility study of a proton CT system based on 4D-tracking and residual energy determination via time-of-flight.
Ulrich-Pur F; Bergauer T; Burker A; Hirtl A; Irmler C; Kaser S; Pitters F; Rit S
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Apr; 67(9):. PubMed ID: 35354129
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A stopping criterion for iterative proton CT image reconstruction based on correlated noise properties.
DeJongh EA; Pryanichnikov AA; DeJongh DF; Schulte RW
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Sep; 24(9):e14114. PubMed ID: 37573575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of Monte Carlo simulation in understanding the performance of proton computed tomography.
Dedes G; Dickmann J; Giacometti V; Rit S; Krah N; Meyer S; Bashkirov V; Schulte R; Johnson RP; Parodi K; Landry G
Z Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 32(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 32798033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An evaluation of spatial resolution of a prototype proton CT scanner.
Plautz TE; Bashkirov V; Giacometti V; Hurley RF; Johnson RP; Piersimoni P; Sadrozinski HF; Schulte RW; Zatserklyaniy A
Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6291. PubMed ID: 27908179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Experimental comparison of relative stopping power evaluation between proton CT and x-ray CT for pre-clinical proton irradiation studies of small animals.
Terakawa A; Hosokawa H; Nogami M; Hitomi K; Ishii K
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Apr; 68(9):. PubMed ID: 37011626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigation of the effect of air gap size on the spatial resolution in proton- and helium radio- and tomography.
Radonic S; Hälg RA; Schneider U
Z Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 32(1):120-128. PubMed ID: 32505460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving single-event proton CT by removing nuclear interaction events within the energy/range detector.
Volz L; Piersimoni P; Johnson RP; Bashkirov VA; Schulte RW; Seco J
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 64(15):15NT01. PubMed ID: 31158820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experimental fluence-modulated proton computed tomography by pencil beam scanning.
Dedes G; Johnson RP; Pankuch M; Detrich N; Pols WMA; Rit S; Schulte RW; Parodi K; Landry G
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3287-3296. PubMed ID: 29786862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
