133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35086730)
1. Clinical and economic validation of grade B postoperative pancreatic fistula subclassification.
Andreasi V; Partelli S; Rancoita PMV; Mele S; Mazza M; La Fauci D; Pecorelli N; Guarneri G; Tamburrino D; Crippa S; Falconi M
Surgery; 2022 Apr; 171(4):846-853. PubMed ID: 35086730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modification of a new subclassification of Grade B postoperative pancreatic fistula: A bicenter retrospective cohort study.
Xu J; Zhang A; Tang B; Tian X; Ma Y; Song J; Qiao J; Wei J; Chen J; Yang Y
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2022 Jun; 29(6):641-648. PubMed ID: 32506811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preoperative Computed Tomography Imaging of the Pancreas Identifying Predictive Factors for the Progression of Grade A, or Biochemical Leak, to Grade B Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Retrospective Study.
Liu FH; Jiang XZ; Huang B; Yu Y
Med Sci Monit; 2021 Feb; 27():e928489. PubMed ID: 33627617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Early postoperative risk stratification in patients with pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Raza SS; Nutu A; Powell-Brett S; Marchetti A; Perri G; Carvalheiro Boteon A; Hodson J; Chatzizacharias N; Dasari BV; Isaac J; Abradelo M; Marudanayagam R; Mirza DF; Roberts JK; Marchegiani G; Salvia R; Sutcliffe RP
Surgery; 2023 Feb; 173(2):492-500. PubMed ID: 37530481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The evolution of post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) classification: A single-center experience.
Nappo G; Capretti GL; Petitti T; Gavazzi F; Ridolfi C; Cereda M; Montorsi M; Zerbi A
Pancreatology; 2019 Apr; 19(3):449-455. PubMed ID: 30890308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Risk factors for biochemical leak progressing to grade B pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy early].
Ji WC; Liu H
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Sep; 57(9):654-659. PubMed ID: 31474056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Isolated Roux loop versus conventional pancreaticojejunostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Ozdemir E; Gokler C; Gunes O; Kaplan K; Aydin MC; Sumer F; Kayaalp C
Ann Ital Chir; 2022; 93():248-253. PubMed ID: 35476642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Postoperative pancreatic fistulas are not equivalent after proximal, distal, and central pancreatectomy.
Pratt W; Maithel SK; Vanounou T; Callery MP; Vollmer CM
J Gastrointest Surg; 2006 Nov; 10(9):1264-78; discussion 1278-9. PubMed ID: 17114013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Invited commentary on "Clinical and economic validation of grade B postoperative pancreatic fistula subclassification" by Andreasi et al.
Hackert T; Büchler MW
Surgery; 2022 Apr; 171(4):854. PubMed ID: 34839936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. High risk pathogens and risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy; a retrospective case-controlled study.
Abe K; Kitago M; Shinoda M; Yagi H; Abe Y; Oshima G; Hori S; Yokose T; Endo Y; Kitagawa Y
Int J Surg; 2020 Oct; 82():136-142. PubMed ID: 32861892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conservative drain management increases the incidence of grade B postoperative pancreatic fistula without increasing serious complications: Does persistent drainage reflect the quality of pancreatic surgery or institutional policy?
Takeda Y; Saiura A; Takahashi Y; Inoue Y; Mise Y; Ito H
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2020 Dec; 27(12):1011-1018. PubMed ID: 33052623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combined pre-operative risk score predicts pancreatic leak after pancreatic resection.
Clements NA; Philips P; Egger ME; McMasters KM; Scoggins CR; Martin RCG
Surg Endosc; 2024 Feb; 38(2):742-756. PubMed ID: 38049669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Decoding Grade B Pancreatic Fistula: A Clinical and Economical Analysis and Subclassification Proposal.
Maggino L; Malleo G; Bassi C; Allegrini V; McMillan MT; Borin A; Chen B; Drebin JA; Ecker BL; Fraker DL; Lee MK; Paiella S; Roses RE; Salvia R; Vollmer CM
Ann Surg; 2019 Jun; 269(6):1146-1153. PubMed ID: 31082914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preoperative CT anthropometric measurements and pancreatic pathology increase risk for postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients following pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Roh YH; Kang BK; Song SY; Lee CM; Jung YK; Kim M
PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243515. PubMed ID: 33270774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic significance of pancreatic fistula and postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Neeman U; Lahat G; Goykhman Y; Geva R; Peles-Avraham S; Nachmany I; Nakache R; Klausner JM; Lubezky N
Surgeon; 2020 Feb; 18(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 31466841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Drainage fluid and serum amylase levels accurately predict development of postoperative pancreatic fistula.
Jin S; Shi XJ; Wang SY; Zhang P; Lv GY; Du XH; Wang GY
World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Sep; 23(34):6357-6364. PubMed ID: 28974903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: We need to redefine grades B and C.
Hackert T; Hinz U; Pausch T; Fesenbeck I; Strobel O; Schneider L; Fritz S; Büchler MW
Surgery; 2016 Mar; 159(3):872-7. PubMed ID: 26603847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Passive drainage to gravity and closed-suction drainage following pancreatoduodenectomy lead to similar grade B and C postoperative pancreatic fistula rates. A meta-analysis.
Gachabayov M; Gogna S; Latifi R; Dong XD
Int J Surg; 2019 Jul; 67():24-31. PubMed ID: 31078675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery Definitions for Postpancreatectomy Complications: Applicability at a High-Volume Center.
Dusch N; Lietzmann A; Barthels F; Niedergethmann M; Rückert F; Wilhelm TJ
Scand J Surg; 2017 Sep; 106(3):216-223. PubMed ID: 28376656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pancreatic neck transection using a harmonic scalpel increases risk of biochemical leak but not postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Wu CH; Chen CH; Ho TW; Shih MC; Wu JM; Kuo TC; Yang CY; Tien YW
HPB (Oxford); 2021 Feb; 23(2):301-308. PubMed ID: 32998842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
