These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35088152)

  • 1. Beyond the ratings: gender effects in written comments from clinical teaching assessments.
    Ginsburg S; Stroud L; Lynch M; Melvin L; Kulasegaram K
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2022 May; 27(2):355-374. PubMed ID: 35088152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Idiosyncrasy in Assessment Comments: Do Faculty Have Distinct Writing Styles When Completing In-Training Evaluation Reports?
    Ginsburg S; Gingerich A; Kogan JR; Watling CJ; Eva KW
    Acad Med; 2020 Nov; 95(11S Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 59th Annual Research in Medical Education Presentations):S81-S88. PubMed ID: 32769454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gender-Based Linguistic Analysis of Pediatric Clinical Faculty Evaluations.
    Webber S; Nackers K; Kelly MM; Nacht CL; Tiedt K; Allen A; Eickhoff J; Babal JC;
    Acad Pediatr; 2022 Mar; 22(2):324-331. PubMed ID: 34923143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of Gender-Based Linguistic Differences in Physician Trainee Evaluations of Medical Faculty Using Automated Text Mining.
    Heath JK; Weissman GE; Clancy CB; Shou H; Farrar JT; Dine CJ
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 May; 2(5):e193520. PubMed ID: 31074813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The language of healthcare worker emotional exhaustion: A linguistic analysis of longitudinal survey.
    Belz FF; Adair KC; Proulx J; Frankel AS; Sexton JB
    Front Psychiatry; 2022; 13():1044378. PubMed ID: 36590605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Written Comments Made by Anesthesia Residents When Providing Below Average Scores for the Supervision Provided by the Faculty Anesthesiologist.
    Dexter F; Szeluga D; Masursky D; Hindman BJ
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Jun; 122(6):2000-6. PubMed ID: 27195642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Getting to the heart of the matter: written disclosure, gender, and heart rate.
    Epstein EM; Sloan DM; Marx BP
    Psychosom Med; 2005; 67(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 15911904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Standardized Letter of Evaluation Narrative: Differences in Language Use by Gender.
    Miller DT; McCarthy DM; Fant AL; Li-Sauerwine S; Ali A; Kontrick AV
    West J Emerg Med; 2019 Oct; 20(6):948-956. PubMed ID: 31738723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do gender and racial differences exist in letters of recommendation for obstetrics and gynecology residency applicants?
    Brown O; Mou T; Lim SI; Jones S; Sade S; Kwasny MJ; Mueller MG; Kenton K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):554.e1-554.e11. PubMed ID: 34506753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hedging to save face: a linguistic analysis of written comments on in-training evaluation reports.
    Ginsburg S; van der Vleuten C; Eva KW; Lingard L
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2016 Mar; 21(1):175-88. PubMed ID: 26184115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A word-count approach to analyze linguistic patterns in the reflective writings of medical students.
    Lin CW; Lin MJ; Wen CC; Chu SY
    Med Educ Online; 2016; 21():29522. PubMed ID: 26838331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Letters of recommendation for pediatric surgery fellowship: Analysis of linguistic differences based on gender of the applicant.
    Bludevich B; Irby I; Chang H; Danielson PD; Gonzalez R; Snyder CW; Chandler NM
    J Pediatr Surg; 2021 Aug; 56(8):1299-1304. PubMed ID: 33785201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An alternative approach to defining the role of the clinical teacher.
    Ullian JA; Bland CJ; Simpson DE
    Acad Med; 1994 Oct; 69(10):832-8. PubMed ID: 7916801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attitudes toward and experiences of gender issues among physician teachers: a survey study conducted at a university teaching hospital in Sweden.
    Risberg G; Johansson EE; Westman G; Hamberg K
    BMC Med Educ; 2008 Feb; 8():10. PubMed ID: 18302735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Linguistic Analysis of Letters of Recommendation for Vascular Surgery and Obstetrics and Gynecology Applicants Detects Differences in Attributable Strengths Based on Gender.
    Go C; Lang S; Byrne M; Brucha DL; Parviainen K; Sachdev U
    J Surg Educ; 2021; 78(5):1535-1543. PubMed ID: 33745859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gender Effects in Assessment of Clinical Teaching: Does Concordance Matter?
    Stroud L; Freeman R; Kulasegaram K; Cil TD; Ginsburg S
    J Grad Med Educ; 2020 Dec; 12(6):710-716. PubMed ID: 33391595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gendered Differences in Teaching Performance Evaluations of Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents.
    Vu C; Farez R; Simpson P; Kaljo K
    J Surg Educ; 2021; 78(6):2038-2045. PubMed ID: 34045159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of Gender-based Qualitative Differences within Trainee Evaluations of Faculty.
    Heath JK; Clancy CB; Carillo-Perez A; Dine CJ
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2020 May; 17(5):621-626. PubMed ID: 31821770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Which characteristics of written feedback are perceived as stimulating students' reflective competence: an exploratory study.
    Dekker H; Schönrock-Adema J; Snoek JW; van der Molen T; Cohen-Schotanus J
    BMC Med Educ; 2013 Jul; 13():94. PubMed ID: 23829790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do Men Apply Differently Than Women? An Analysis of Language in Standardized Application Documents.
    Brandt PM; Herzberg PY
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2023 Apr; 52(2):589-605. PubMed ID: 36050564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.