These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35088808)

  • 41. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored With Different Methods.
    Mergulhão VA; de Mendonça LS; de Albuquerque MS; Braz R
    Oper Dent; 2019; 44(1):E1-E11. PubMed ID: 30715998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Influence of collagen removal on shear bond strength of one-bottle adhesive systems in dentin.
    de Castro AK; Hara AT; Pimenta LA
    J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 11317373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Initial repair bond strength of a nano-filled hybrid resin: effect of surface treatments and bonding agents.
    Yesilyurt C; Kusgoz A; Bayram M; Ulker M
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(4):251-60. PubMed ID: 19689724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Shear bond strength of three different nano-restorative materials to dentin.
    Korkmaz Y; Gurgan S; Firat E; Nathanson D
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 20166411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of different adhesion strategies on bond strength of resin composite to composite-dentin complex.
    Özcan M; Pekkan G
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 22812912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Microshear bond strength and finite element analysis of resin composite adhesion to press-on-metal ceramic for repair actions after various conditioning methods.
    Kanat B; Cömlekoğlu ME; Cömlekoğlu MD; Culha O; Ozcan M; Güngör MA
    J Adhes Dent; 2014 Feb; 16(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 23878833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effects of surface treatment and artificial aging on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to four different provisional restorations.
    Al Jabbari YS; Al Taweel SM; Al Rifaiy M; Alqahtani MQ; Koutsoukis T; Zinelis S
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jul; 84(4):649-55. PubMed ID: 24446920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Shear bond strength of different surface treatments in bulk fill, microhybrid, and nanoparticle repair resins.
    de Jesus Tavarez RR; Almeida Júnior LJDS; Guará TCG; Ribeiro IS; Maia Filho EM; Firoozmand LM
    Clin Cosmet Investig Dent; 2017; 9():61-66. PubMed ID: 28721100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effect of 'Try-in' paste removal method on bond strength to lithium disilicate ceramic.
    Prata RA; de Oliveira VP; de Menezes FC; Borges GA; de Andrade OS; Gonçalves LS
    J Dent; 2011 Dec; 39(12):863-70. PubMed ID: 22001411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Determination of polymerization shrinkage of different composites using a photoelastic method.
    Rullman I; Patyna M; Janssen B; Willershausen B
    Am J Dent; 2017 Feb; 30(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 29178709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of Shear Bond Strength and Microleakage of Various Bulk-fill Bioactive Dentin substitutes: An in vitro Study.
    Alkhudhairy FI; Ahmad ZH
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Dec; 17(12):997-1002. PubMed ID: 27965486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Shear bond strength of aesthetic materials bonded to Ni-Cr alloy.
    Almilhatti HJ; Giampaolo ET; Vergani CE; Machado AL; Pavarina AC
    J Dent; 2003 Mar; 31(3):205-11. PubMed ID: 12726705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Shrinkage stress and elastic modulus assessment of bulk-fill composites.
    Rizzante FAP; Mondelli RFL; Furuse AY; Borges AFS; Mendonça G; Ishikiriama SK
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2019 Jan; 27():e20180132. PubMed ID: 30624465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Influence of curing rate of resin composite on the bond strength to dentin.
    Benetti AR; Asmussen E; Peutzfeldt A
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 17427823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Low- and high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites: a comparison of microhardness, microtensile bond strength, and fracture strength in restored molars.
    França FM; Tenuti JG; Broglio IP; Paiva LE; Basting RT; Turssi CP; do Amaral FL; Reis AF; Vieira-Junior WF
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2021 Aug; 34(2):173-182. PubMed ID: 34570866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Influence of cross-head speed on resin-dentin shear bond strength.
    Hara AT; Pimenta LA; Rodrigues AL
    Dent Mater; 2001 Mar; 17(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 11163387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Marginal adaptation of indirect restorations using different resin coating protocols.
    Medina AD; de Paula AB; de Fucio SB; Puppin-Rontani RM; Correr-Sobrinho L; Sinhoreti MA
    Braz Dent J; 2012; 23(6):672-8. PubMed ID: 23338259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Evaluation of bulk-fill systems: microtensile bond strength and non-destructive imaging of marginal adaptation.
    Fronza BM; Makishi P; Sadr A; Shimada Y; Sumi Y; Tagami J; Giannini M
    Braz Oral Res; 2018 Aug; 32():e80. PubMed ID: 30088553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of conventional composite resin and nanocomposite resin to sandblasted primary anterior stainless steel crown.
    Khatri A; Nandlal B;
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2007; 25(2):82-5. PubMed ID: 17660642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of linear polymerization shrinkage and microhardness between QTH-cured & LED-cured composites.
    Park SH; Kim SS; Cho YS; Lee SY; Noh BD
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(4):461-7. PubMed ID: 16130866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.