139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35088935)
1. Development and maintenance of surface gloss of dental composites after polishing and brushing: Review of the literature.
Amaya-Pajares SP; Koi K; Watanabe H; da Costa JB; Ferracane JL
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Jan; 34(1):15-41. PubMed ID: 35088935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Isolated effect of filler particle size on surface properties of experimental resin composites before and after toothbrush abrasion.
Kobayashi M; Koi K; Wiskoski S; Watanabe H; Lewis S; Ferracane JL
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Dec; 35(8):1286-1292. PubMed ID: 37449726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Do nanofill or submicron composites show improved smoothness and gloss? A systematic review of in vitro studies.
Kaizer MR; de Oliveira-Ogliari A; Cenci MS; Opdam NJ; Moraes RR
Dent Mater; 2014 Apr; 30(4):e41-78. PubMed ID: 24529799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of a new polishing system on changes in gloss and surface roughness of resin composites after polishing and brushing.
Sang EJ; Song JS; Chung SH; Jin BH; Hyun HK
Dent Mater J; 2021 May; 40(3):727-735. PubMed ID: 33563847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of various resin composites.
Da Costa J; Ferracane J; Paravina RD; Mazur RF; Roeder L
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(4):214-24; discussion 225-6. PubMed ID: 17635330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomised controlled study on the use of finishing and polishing systems on different resin composites using 3D contact optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy.
Daud A; Gray G; Lynch CD; Wilson NHF; Blum IR
J Dent; 2018 Apr; 71():25-30. PubMed ID: 29360492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness, gloss and color of resin-based composites.
Paravina RD; Roeder L; Lu H; Vogel K; Powers JM
Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):262-6. PubMed ID: 15478488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of different finishing/polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites.
Antonson SA; Yazici AR; Kilinc E; Antonson DE; Hardigan PC
J Dent; 2011 Jul; 39 Suppl 1():e9-17. PubMed ID: 21256180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the surface hardness, roughness, gloss and color of composites after different finishing/polishing treatments and thermocycling using a multitechnique approach.
Pala K; Tekçe N; Tuncer S; Serim ME; Demirci M
Dent Mater J; 2016; 35(2):278-89. PubMed ID: 27041019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing.
Senawongse P; Pongprueksa P
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(5):265-73; discussion 274-5. PubMed ID: 17877626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surface properties of universal and flowable nanohybrid composites after simulated tooth brushing.
Jin J; Takahashi R; Hickel R; Kunzelmann KH
Am J Dent; 2014 Jun; 27(3):149-54. PubMed ID: 25208363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of four different finishing and polishing systems on resin composites: roughness surface and gloss retention evaluations.
Tosco V; Monterubbianesi R; Orilisi G; Procaccini M; Grandini S; Putignano A; Orsini G
Minerva Stomatol; 2020 Aug; 69(4):207-214. PubMed ID: 31633320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can Reduced-Step Polishers Be as Effective as Multiple-Step Polishers in Enhancing Surface Smoothness?
Kemaloglu H; Karacolak G; Turkun LS
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Feb; 29(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 27393008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of Surface Roughness, Hardness, and Gloss of Composites After Three Different Finishing and Polishing Techniques: An In Vitro Study.
Nithya K; Sridevi K; Keerthi V; Ravishankar P
Cureus; 2020 Feb; 12(2):e7037. PubMed ID: 32211270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro comparison of one-step, two-step, and three-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and gloss of different resin composites.
Lippert VF; Bresciani E; Mota EG; Bittencourt HR; Kramer PF; Spohr AM
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 May; 36(5):785-795. PubMed ID: 38130085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surface roughness and gloss alteration of polished resin composites with various filler types after simulated toothbrush abrasion.
Yu P; Yang SM; Xu YX; Wang XY
J Dent Sci; 2023 Jul; 18(3):1016-1022. PubMed ID: 37404657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surface roughness and gloss of polished nanofilled and nanohybrid resin composites.
Zhang L; Yu P; Wang XY
J Dent Sci; 2021 Oct; 16(4):1198-1203. PubMed ID: 34484588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Surface roughness, gloss and sequential polishing times of various chairside computer aided design/manufacturing restorative materials].
Luo H; Tian FC; Wang XY
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2022 Jun; 54(3):565-571. PubMed ID: 35701137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials.
Türkün LS; Türkün M
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 15088733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of two-step versus four-step composite finishing/polishing disc systems: evaluation of a new two-step composite polishing disc system.
da Costa JB; Goncalves F; Ferracane JL
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 21702670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
