These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 350895)

  • 1. Bacitracin and coagglutination for grouping of beta-hemolytic streptococci.
    Stoner RA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1978 May; 7(5):463-6. PubMed ID: 350895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Presumptive identification of streptococci with a new test system.
    Facklam RR; Thacker LG; Fox B; Eriquez L
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Jun; 15(6):987-90. PubMed ID: 7050157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Grouping of A, B, C and G beta-hemolytic streptococci by the Phadebact Streptococcus Test (author's transl)].
    Mosimann J; Brunner P
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A; 1979 Oct; 245(1-2):25-32. PubMed ID: 44618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Identification of strains of beta-hemolytic streptococci of groups A, B, C, and G by coagglutination].
    Tamargo Martínez I; Valdivia Alvarez JA; Lera Marqués A
    Rev Cubana Med Trop; 1992; 44(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 9768205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Grouping of beta-haemolytic streptococci by using coagglutination, precipitation or bacitracin sensitivity.
    Arvilommi H
    Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B; 1976 Apr; 84(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 775887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Grouping of hemolytic streptococci and typing of group A hemolytic streptococci. II. Comparison among electrosyneresis, capillary precipitin reaction, bacitracin disc method and Kobayashi's method].
    Kobayashi S; Hamada A
    Kansenshogaku Zasshi; 1975 Mar; 49(3):113-6. PubMed ID: 811717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of fluorescent antibody, bacitracin susceptibility, latex agglutination, coagglutination, and API 20S for identifying group A streptococci.
    Lesher RJ; Casiano-Colon AE
    Can J Microbiol; 1985 Apr; 31(4):335-8. PubMed ID: 3891053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Methods for differentiation of streptococci: comparison of serological, biochemical methods, triple- and camp-test (author's transl)].
    Jaeger U; Büsse G
    Immun Infekt; 1980; 8(2):61-3. PubMed ID: 7005081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rapid identification of group A, B, C and G beta-haemolytic Streptococci by a modification of the co-agglutination technique. Comparison of results obtained by co-agglutination, fluorescent antibody test, counterimmunoelectrophoresis, and precipitin technique.
    Arvilommi H; Uurasmaa O; Nurkkala A
    Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B; 1978 Apr; 86(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 358741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Co-agglutination as an alternative to precipitin testing in streptococcal grouping (author's transl)].
    Visintin G; Revelant P
    Ann Sclavo; 1979; 21(6):816-22. PubMed ID: 400090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new approach for presumptive identification of clinically important streptococci.
    Hussain Z; Lannigan R; Stoakes L
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A; 1984 Oct; 258(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 6441390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laboratory evaluation of a rapid four-hour serological grouping of groups A,B,C, and G beta-streptococci by the Phadebact streptococcus test.
    Rosner R
    J Clin Microbiol; 1977 Jul; 6(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 328533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A rapid staphylococcal coagglutination technic to differentiate group A from other streptococcal groups.
    Matthieu DE; Wasilauskas BL; Stallings RA
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1979 Sep; 72(3):463-7. PubMed ID: 382835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rapid slide agglutination test for Lancefield grouping of streptococci.
    Damask LJ; Montoya O; Axelrod JL
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1979 Aug; 103(9):456-8. PubMed ID: 380509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the Strep-A-Chek technique for presumptive identification of group A beta-hemolytic streptococci and group D enterococci.
    Daly JA; Rufener ML
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1987 Jul; 7(3):215-8. PubMed ID: 3308307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lack of reliability of primary grouping of beta-hemolytic streptococci by culture of throat swabs with streptocult supplemented with bacitracin disks in general practice.
    Hoffmann S
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Oct; 22(4):497-500. PubMed ID: 3908467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Further studies on the reliability of the bacitracin inhibition test for the presumptive identification of Lancefield group A streptococci.
    Coleman DJ; McGhie D; Tebbutt GM
    J Clin Pathol; 1977 May; 30(5):421-6. PubMed ID: 325019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation of various methods for grouping hemolytic streptococci and frequency of isolation of group A, B, C, D, F and G streptococci isolated from clinical specimens].
    Kouda M; Umehara C; Kumagai I; Kobayashi J; Sugai R; Matsuzaki H
    Kansenshogaku Zasshi; 1988 May; 62(5):427-34. PubMed ID: 3138316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical trial comparing bacitracin with Strep-A-Chek for accuracy and turnaround time in the presumptive identification of Streptococcus pyogenes.
    Yajko DM; Lawrence J; Nassos P; Young J; Hadley WK
    J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Sep; 24(3):431-4. PubMed ID: 3531230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Differentiation of serologic group A streptococci from group C and G using disks with various bacitracin levels].
    Urbásková P; Motlová J; Benes O; Jelínková J
    Cesk Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol; 1993 Jun; 42(2):76-7. PubMed ID: 8348626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.