These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35091506)

  • 1. The Spatiotemporal Link of Temporal Expectations: Contextual Temporal Expectation Is Independent of Spatial Attention.
    Tal-Perry N; Yuval-Greenberg S
    J Neurosci; 2022 Mar; 42(12):2516-2523. PubMed ID: 35091506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Children can implicitly, but not voluntarily, direct attention in time.
    Johnson KA; Burrowes E; Coull JT
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0123625. PubMed ID: 25881188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The modulation of expectation violation on attention: Evidence from the spatial cueing effects.
    Chen L; Zhu P; Li J; Song H; Liu H; Shen M; Chen H
    Cognition; 2023 Sep; 238():105488. PubMed ID: 37178591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Temporal Expectation Hastens Decision Onset But Does Not Affect Evidence Quality.
    van den Brink RL; Murphy PR; Desender K; de Ru N; Nieuwenhuis S
    J Neurosci; 2021 Jan; 41(1):130-143. PubMed ID: 33172980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Temporal expectation driven by rhythmic cues compared to that driven by symbolic cues provides a more precise attentional focus in time.
    Xu Z; Ren Y; Guo T; Wang A; Nakao T; Ejima Y; Yang J; Takahashi S; Wu J; Wu Q; Zhang M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):308-314. PubMed ID: 33098067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Updating Contextual Sensory Expectations for Adaptive Behavior.
    Ferrari A; Richter D; de Lange FP
    J Neurosci; 2022 Nov; 42(47):8855-8869. PubMed ID: 36280262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Explicitly versus implicitly driven temporal expectations: No evidence for altered perceptual processing due to top-down modulations.
    Ball F; Groth RM; Agostino CS; Porcu E; Noesselt T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1793-1807. PubMed ID: 31875312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory target detection is affected by implicit temporal and spatial expectations.
    Rimmele J; Jolsvai H; Sussman E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 May; 23(5):1136-47. PubMed ID: 20146603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Isochronous Sequential Presentation Helps Children Orient Their Attention in Time.
    Johnson KA; Bryan M; Polonowita K; Decroupet D; Coull JT
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1417. PubMed ID: 27713713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does Temporal Expectation Driven by Rhythmic Cues Differ From That Driven by Symbolic Cues Across the Millisecond and Second Range?
    Ren Y; Xu Z; Wu F; Ejima Y; Yang J; Takahashi S; Wu Q; Wu J
    Perception; 2019 Jun; 48(6):515-529. PubMed ID: 31046568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Covert orienting of attention in macaques. II. Contributions of parietal cortex.
    Robinson DL; Bowman EM; Kertzman C
    J Neurophysiol; 1995 Aug; 74(2):698-712. PubMed ID: 7472375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combining spatial and temporal expectations to improve visual perception.
    Rohenkohl G; Gould IC; Pessoa J; Nobre AC
    J Vis; 2014 Apr; 14(4):. PubMed ID: 24722562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Probability-driven and stimulus-driven orienting of attention to time and sensory modality.
    Menceloglu M; Grabowecky M; Suzuki S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2732-2744. PubMed ID: 31254259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal orienting of attention can be preserved in normal aging.
    Chauvin JJ; Gillebert CR; Rohenkohl G; Humphreys GW; Nobre AC
    Psychol Aging; 2016 Aug; 31(5):442-55. PubMed ID: 27294712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temporal expectation and information processing: a model-based analysis.
    Jepma M; Wagenmakers EJ; Nieuwenhuis S
    Cognition; 2012 Mar; 122(3):426-41. PubMed ID: 22197060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Incentive value and spatial certainty combine additively to determine visual priorities.
    Garner KG; Bowman H; Raymond JE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):173-186. PubMed ID: 33034850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Expectation mismatch: differences between self-generated and cue-induced expectations.
    Gaschler R; Schwager S; Umbach VJ; Frensch PA; Schubert T
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2014 Oct; 46 Pt 1():139-57. PubMed ID: 24971824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prestimulus inhibition of eye movements reflects temporal expectation rather than time estimation.
    Tal-Perry N; Yuval-Greenberg S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Aug; 83(6):2473-2485. PubMed ID: 33982205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dissociable influences of implicit temporal expectation on attentional performance and mind wandering.
    Massar SAA; Poh JH; Lim J; Chee MWL
    Cognition; 2020 Jun; 199():104242. PubMed ID: 32120046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differential modulation of visual responses by distractor or target expectations.
    Noonan MP; Von Lautz AH; Bauer Y; Summerfield C; Stokes MS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):845-862. PubMed ID: 36460926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.