These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35091995)

  • 21. What is the time course of working memory attentional refreshing?
    Lemaire B; Pageot A; Plancher G; Portrat S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Feb; 25(1):370-385. PubMed ID: 28364345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Working memory prioritization impacts neural recovery from distraction.
    Mallett R; Lewis-Peacock JA
    Cortex; 2019 Dec; 121():225-238. PubMed ID: 31629945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparing different instructed-refreshing schedules: evidence for cumulative, forward-order refreshing of verbal lists?
    Vergauwe E
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2018 Jul; 1424(1):102-114. PubMed ID: 29683486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The neglected contribution of memory encoding in spatial cueing: A new theory of costs and benefits.
    Chen H; Wyble B
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Nov; 125(6):936-968. PubMed ID: 30080067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Directed avoidance and its effect on visual working memory.
    Williams RS; Pratt J; Ferber S
    Cognition; 2020 Aug; 201():104277. PubMed ID: 32276234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prioritization within visual working memory reflects a flexible focus of attention.
    Sandry J; Ricker TJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Aug; 82(6):2985-3004. PubMed ID: 32488643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Temporal-contextual processing in working memory: evidence from delayed cued recall and delayed free recall tests.
    Loaiza VM; McCabe DP
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Feb; 40(2):191-203. PubMed ID: 21948350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The eyes don't have it: Eye movements are unlikely to reflect refreshing in working memory.
    Loaiza VM; Souza AS
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0271116. PubMed ID: 35834590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Manipulating the focus of attention in working memory: Evidence for a protection of multiple items against perceptual interference.
    Barth A; Schneider D
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jul; 55(7):e13062. PubMed ID: 29315628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stuck on the Last: The Last-Presented Benefit as an Index of Attentional Refreshing in Adolescents.
    Valentini B; Vergauwe E
    J Intell; 2022 Dec; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 36662134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Attentional flexibility and prioritization improves long-term memory.
    Sandry J; Zuppichini MD; Ricker TJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Jul; 208():103104. PubMed ID: 32622150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessing the robustness of feature-based selection in visual working memory.
    Arnicane A; Souza AS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 May; 47(5):731-758. PubMed ID: 34264730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Neural Reinstatement Tracks Spread of Attention between Object Features in Working Memory.
    Printzlau FAB; Myers NE; Manohar SG; Stokes MG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Aug; 34(9):1681-1701. PubMed ID: 35704549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The influence of aging on attentional refreshing and articulatory rehearsal during working memory on later episodic memory performance.
    Loaiza VM; McCabe DP
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2013; 20(4):471-93. PubMed ID: 23116456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The impact of cognitive load on delayed recall.
    Camos V; Portrat S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Aug; 22(4):1029-34. PubMed ID: 25421406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Retrospective Cues Mitigate Information Loss in Human Cortex during Working Memory Storage.
    Ester EF; Nouri A; Rodriguez L
    J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 38(40):8538-8548. PubMed ID: 30126971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Task-dependent effects of voluntary space-based and involuntary feature-based attention on visual working memory.
    Qian J; Zhang K; Lei Q; Han Y; Li W
    Psychol Res; 2020 Jul; 84(5):1304-1319. PubMed ID: 30840142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. On the fate of non-cued mental representations in visuo-spatial working memory: Evidence by a retro-cuing paradigm.
    Schneider D; Mertes C; Wascher E
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 293():114-24. PubMed ID: 26196953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Barriers block the effect of joint attention on working memory: Perspective taking matters.
    Gregory SEA; Jackson MC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 May; 45(5):795-806. PubMed ID: 30024257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Neural Consequences of Attentional Prioritization of Internal Representations in Visual Working Memory.
    Sahan MI; Sheldon AD; Postle BR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 May; 32(5):917-944. PubMed ID: 31851592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.