BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35092503)

  • 1. Comparative in vitro analysis of the sliding resistance of a modern 3D-printed polymer bracket in combination with different archwire types.
    Hodecker L; Bourauel C; Braumann B; Kruse T; Christ H; Scharf S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 May; 26(5):4049-4057. PubMed ID: 35092503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sliding behaviour and surface quality after static air polishing of conventional and modern bracket materials : In vitro analysis.
    Hodecker L; Bourauel C; Braumann B; Kruse T; Christ H; Scharf S
    J Orofac Orthop; 2023 Mar; 84(2):110-124. PubMed ID: 34554279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro sliding-driven morphological changes in representative esthetic NiTi archwire surfaces.
    Choi S; Park DJ; Kim KA; Park KH; Park HK; Park YG
    Microsc Res Tech; 2015 Oct; 78(10):926-34. PubMed ID: 26278620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frictional resistances using Teflon-coated ligatures with various bracket-archwire combinations.
    De Franco DJ; Spiller RE; von Fraunhofer JA
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(1):63-72; discussion 73-4. PubMed ID: 7726464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of friction of conventional and metal-insert ceramic brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations.
    Cacciafesta V; Sfondrini MF; Scribante A; Klersy C; Auricchio F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Oct; 124(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 14560270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An in vitro investigation of the influence of self-ligating brackets, low friction ligatures, and archwire on frictional resistance.
    Tecco S; Di Iorio D; Cordasco G; Verrocchi I; Festa F
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):390-7. PubMed ID: 17702800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An in vitro Evaluation of Friction Characteristics of Conventional Stainless Steel and Self-ligating Stainless Steel Brackets with different Dimensions of Archwires in Various Bracket-archwire Combination.
    Sridharan K; Sandbhor S; Rajasekaran UB; Sam G; Ramees MM; Abraham EA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):660-664. PubMed ID: 28816185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwire: an in vitro study.
    Husain N; Kumar A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Mar; 12(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 22186750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An ex-vivo investigation into the effect of bracket displacement on the resistance to sliding.
    O'Reilly D; Dowling PA; Lagerstrom L; Swartz ML
    Br J Orthod; 1999 Sep; 26(3):219-27. PubMed ID: 10532161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative Evaluation of Frictional Resistance Between Different Types of Ceramic Brackets and Stainless Steel Brackets With Teflon-Coated Stainless Steel and Stainless Steel Archwires: An In-Vitro Study.
    Bhat KRR; Ahmed N; Joseph R; Younus A A
    Cureus; 2022 Apr; 14(4):e24161. PubMed ID: 35586355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Research paper: The three-dimensional mechanical response of orthodontic archwires and brackets in vitro during simulated orthodontic torque.
    Tran B; Nobes DS; Major PW; Carey JP; Romanyk DL
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Feb; 114():104196. PubMed ID: 33221162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of archwire size and material on the resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry state.
    Thorstenson GA; Kusy RP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Sep; 122(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 12226612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative study of biomechanical effects between two types of 2 × 4 techniques employing a rocking-chair archwire: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Wang S; Hu M; Wang S; Qi H; Song D; Jiang H
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Aug; 27(8):4617-4631. PubMed ID: 37294355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resistance to sliding of orthodontic archwires under increasing applied moments.
    Youssef A; Dennis C; Beyer JP; Grünheid T
    J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2020; 18():2280800020968027. PubMed ID: 33264051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of force loss during sliding of low friction and conventional TMA orthodontic archwires : An in vitro study.
    Alsabti N; Bourauel C; Talic N
    J Orofac Orthop; 2021 Jul; 82(4):218-225. PubMed ID: 33263771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations.
    Monteiro MR; Silva LE; Elias CN; Vilella Ode V
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2014 Jun; 22(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 25025564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of galvanic corrosion potential of metal injection molded brackets to that of conventional metal brackets with nickel-titanium and copper nickel-titanium archwire combinations.
    Varma DP; Chidambaram S; Reddy KB; Vijay M; Ravindranath D; Prasad MR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):488-95. PubMed ID: 24171995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Force loss in archwire-guided tooth movement of conventional and self-ligating brackets.
    Montasser MA; El-Bialy T; Keilig L; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Feb; 36(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 23382468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Friction forces generated by aesthetic Gummetal® (Ti-Nb) orthodontic archwires: A comparative in vitro study.
    Albawardi A; Warunek S; Makowka S; Al-Jewair T
    Int Orthod; 2022 Dec; 20(4):100683. PubMed ID: 35995715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Friction ... Friction resistance between edgewise brackets and archwires.
    Ho KS; West VC
    Aust Orthod J; 1991 Oct; 12(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 1843797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.