These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35092903)

  • 21. The role of causal models in multiple judgments under uncertainty.
    Hayes BK; Hawkins GE; Newell BR; Pasqualino M; Rehder B
    Cognition; 2014 Dec; 133(3):611-20. PubMed ID: 25238316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Predicting responsibility judgments from dispositional inferences and causal attributions.
    Langenhoff AF; Wiegmann A; Halpern JY; Tenenbaum JB; Gerstenberg T
    Cogn Psychol; 2021 Sep; 129():101412. PubMed ID: 34303092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The role of mechanism knowledge in singular causation judgments.
    Stephan S; Waldmann MR
    Cognition; 2022 Jan; 218():104924. PubMed ID: 34673301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Crime and punishment: distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment.
    Cushman F
    Cognition; 2008 Aug; 108(2):353-80. PubMed ID: 18439575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Belief-based and covariation-based cues affect causal discounting.
    Fugelsang JA; Thompson VA
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Mar; 55(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 11301730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An interaction effect of norm violations on causal judgment.
    Gill M; Kominsky JF; Icard TF; Knobe J
    Cognition; 2022 Nov; 228():105183. PubMed ID: 35830782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accounting for occurrences: a new view of the use of contingency information in causal judgment.
    White PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):204-18. PubMed ID: 18194063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. How temporal assumptions influence causal judgments.
    Hagmayer Y; Waldmann MR
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Oct; 30(7):1128-37. PubMed ID: 12507377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Primacy in causal strength judgments: the effect of initial evidence for generative versus inhibitory relationships.
    Dennis MJ; Ahn WK
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Jan; 29(1):152-64. PubMed ID: 11277458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Contrasting cue-density effects in causal and prediction judgments.
    Vadillo MA; Musca SC; Blanco F; Matute H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Feb; 18(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 21327350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reasoners consider alternative causes in predictive and diagnostic reasoning.
    Aßfalg A; Klauer KC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2188-2208. PubMed ID: 30998074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Counterfactual thinking and recency effects in causal judgment.
    Henne P; Kulesza A; Perez K; Houcek A
    Cognition; 2021 Jul; 212():104708. PubMed ID: 33819848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Are Jurors Intuitive Statisticians? Bayesian Causal Reasoning in Legal Contexts.
    Shengelia T; Lagnado D
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():519262. PubMed ID: 33613348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stable Causal Relationships Are Better Causal Relationships.
    Vasilyeva N; Blanchard T; Lombrozo T
    Cogn Sci; 2018 May; 42(4):1265-1296. PubMed ID: 29687462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Causal-explanatory pluralism: How intentions, functions, and mechanisms influence causal ascriptions.
    Lombrozo T
    Cogn Psychol; 2010 Dec; 61(4):303-32. PubMed ID: 20801434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Eye-Tracking Causality.
    Gerstenberg T; Peterson MF; Goodman ND; Lagnado DA; Tenenbaum JB
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1731-1744. PubMed ID: 29039251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The impact of domain-specific beliefs on decisions and causal judgments.
    Müller SM; Garcia-Retamero R; Galesic M; Maldonado A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):472-80. PubMed ID: 24076330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reconciling intuitive physics and Newtonian mechanics for colliding objects.
    Sanborn AN; Mansinghka VK; Griffiths TL
    Psychol Rev; 2013 Apr; 120(2):411-37. PubMed ID: 23458084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of causal knowledge on judgments of the likelihood of unknown features.
    Procror C; Ahn WK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Aug; 14(4):635-9. PubMed ID: 17972725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of causal information on judgments of treatment efficacy.
    Yopchick JE; Kim NS
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Jan; 37(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 19103973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.