BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35092977)

  • 21. Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes.
    Deng HY; Luo J; Li SX; Li G; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD
    Dis Esophagus; 2019 Jul; 32(7):. PubMed ID: 30496378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Tagkalos E; Goense L; Hoppe-Lotichius M; Ruurda JP; Babic B; Hadzijusufovic E; Kneist W; van der Sluis PC; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 31206577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Outcomes, quality of life, and survival after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches.
    Wang H; Shen Y; Feng M; Zhang Y; Jiang W; Xu S; Tan L; Wang Q
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Apr; 149(4):1006-14; discussion 1014- 5.e4. PubMed ID: 25752374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.
    He H; Wu Q; Wang Z; Zhang Y; Chen N; Fu J; Zhang G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 May; 13(1):52. PubMed ID: 29792203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Comparative study of perioperative complications and lymphadenectomy between minimally invasive esophagectomy and open procedure].
    Mao T; Fang WT; Gu ZT; Yao F; Guo XF; Chen WH
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Sep; 15(9):922-5. PubMed ID: 22990924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan.
    Takeuchi H; Miyata H; Ozawa S; Udagawa H; Osugi H; Matsubara H; Konno H; Seto Y; Kitagawa Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 28224366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy in the treatment of locally advanced esophageal carcinoma].
    Zhu CC; Chen BF; Kong M; Wang CG; Wang Z; Ma DH; Ye MH; Ye ZR
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Sep; 15(9):943-6. PubMed ID: 22990929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of pleural adhesions on short- and long-term outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a propensity score matching analysis.
    Bao T; Zhao XL; Liu B; Li KK; Wang YJ; Guo W
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Mar; 37(3):1727-1734. PubMed ID: 36214915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Hybrid thoracoscopic esophagectomy for cancer - retrospective analysis and comparison with transhiatal resection.
    Jínek T; Adamcik L; Duda M; Skrovina M
    Rozhl Chir; 2018; 97(7):320-327. PubMed ID: 30442013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Ahmadi N; Crnic A; Seely AJ; Sundaresan SR; Villeneuve PJ; Maziak DE; Shamji FM; Gilbert S
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1892-1900. PubMed ID: 29067584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Outcomes of minimally invasive total mesoesophageal excision: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Lin J; He J; Chen S; Lin J; Han Z; Chen M; Yu S; Gao L; Peng K; Shen Z; Zhang P; Kang M
    Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3234-3245. PubMed ID: 34845550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Intraoperative conversion does not affect the oncological outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy for treatment of esophageal cancer.
    Liu XH; Hu Y; Li KK; Wang YJ; Jiang YG; Guo W
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4517-4526. PubMed ID: 29766306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of short-term outcomes between 2- and 3-field lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer.
    Yamashita K; Makino T; Yamasaki M; Tanaka K; Hara T; Miyazaki Y; Takahashi T; Kurokawa Y; Nakajima K; Takiguchi S; Mori M; Doki Y
    Dis Esophagus; 2017 Nov; 30(11):1-8. PubMed ID: 28881906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Lower Incidence of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Following Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Propensity Score-Matched Comparison to Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.
    Tsunoda S; Obama K; Hisamori S; Nishigori T; Okamura R; Maekawa H; Sakai Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):639-647. PubMed ID: 32892268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effectiveness of jejunostomy for enteral nutrition during complete thoracoscopic and laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in thoracic segment esophageal carcinoma.
    Tian J; Mei X; Guo M; Xiong R; Sun X
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):142. PubMed ID: 32552786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Influence of pulmonary function after combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy for the treatment of esophageal carcinoma].
    Chen BF; Kong M; Zhu CC; Ye ZR; Ye MH; Chen CY; Jia LM; Zhang B; Ye JH
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jul; 50(7):633-6. PubMed ID: 22943996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Low invasiveness of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches between thoracoscopic and open esophagectomy.
    Kanekiyo S; Takeda S; Tsutsui M; Nishiyama M; Kitahara M; Shindo Y; Tokumitsu Y; Tomochika S; Tokuhisa Y; Iida M; Sakamoto K; Suzuki N; Yamamoto S; Yoshino S; Hazama S; Ueno T; Nagano H
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1945-1953. PubMed ID: 29075967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Safety and feasibility of minimally invasive esophagectomy for elderly esophageal cancer patients.
    Sugita Y; Nakamura T; Sawada R; Takiguchi G; Urakawa N; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Kanaji S; Matsuda Y; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Oshikiri T; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y
    Dis Esophagus; 2021 Mar; 34(3):. PubMed ID: 32895704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Total minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma reduces postoperative pain and pneumonia compared to hybrid esophagectomy.
    Berlth F; Plum PS; Chon SH; Gutschow CA; Bollschweiler E; Hölscher AH
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Dec; 32(12):4957-4965. PubMed ID: 29931451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of single- and multi-incision minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for treating esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched study.
    Lee JM; Chen SC; Yang SM; Tseng YF; Yang PW; Huang PM
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2925-2931. PubMed ID: 27826778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.