212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35093014)
1. Decision tree model predicts live birth after surgery for moderate-to-severe intrauterine adhesions.
Zhu R; Duan H; Xu W; Wang S; Gan L; Xu Q; Li J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Jan; 22(1):78. PubMed ID: 35093014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The density of endometrial glandular openings: a novel variable to predict the live birth rate in patients with intrauterine adhesions following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis.
Zhao X; Gao B; Yang X; Zhang A; Jamail G; Li Y; Xu D
Hum Reprod; 2021 Mar; 36(4):965-975. PubMed ID: 33486509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Decision Tree Analysis: A Retrospective Analysis of Postoperative Recurrence of Adhesions in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Intrauterine.
Zhu R; Duan H; Wang S; Gan L; Xu Q; Li J
Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():7391965. PubMed ID: 31915701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of early second-look hysteroscopy on reproductive outcomes after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with intrauterine adhesion, a retrospective study in China.
Xu W; Zhang Y; Yang Y; Zhang S; Lin X
Int J Surg; 2018 Feb; 50():49-54. PubMed ID: 29203342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A retrospective cohort study to examine factors affecting live birth after hysteroscopic treatment of intrauterine adhesions.
Zhao Y; Huang X; Huang R; Xu R; Xia E; Li TC
Fertil Steril; 2024 May; 121(5):873-880. PubMed ID: 38246404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Live birth rate and obstetric complications following the hysteroscopic management of intrauterine adhesions including Asherman syndrome.
Deans R; Vancaillie T; Ledger W; Liu J; Abbott JA
Hum Reprod; 2018 Oct; 33(10):1847-1853. PubMed ID: 30239778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictive value of live birth rate based on different intrauterine adhesion evaluation systems following TCRA.
Cao M; Pan Y; Zhang Q; You D; Feng S; Liu Z
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2021 Jan; 19(1):13. PubMed ID: 33482838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Etiology, treatment, and reproductive prognosis of women with moderate-to-severe intrauterine adhesions.
Xiao S; Wan Y; Xue M; Zeng X; Xiao F; Xu D; Yang X; Zhang P; Sheng W; Xu J; Zhou S
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 May; 125(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 24598346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors That Impact Fertility after Hysteroscopic Adhesiolysis for Intrauterine Adhesions and Amenorrhea: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Chen L; Xiao S; He S; Tian Q; Xue M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 30880159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: efficacy and safety.
Sanad AS; Aboulfotouh ME
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Aug; 294(2):411-6. PubMed ID: 27129970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficiency and pregnancy outcome of serial intrauterine device-guided hysteroscopic adhesiolysis of intrauterine synechiae.
Pabuccu R; Onalan G; Kaya C; Selam B; Ceyhan T; Ornek T; Kuzudisli E
Fertil Steril; 2008 Nov; 90(5):1973-7. PubMed ID: 18774563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fertility and anatomical outcomes following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: An 11-year retrospective cohort study to validate a new classification system for intrauterine adhesions (Urman-Vitale Classification System).
Urman B; Yakin K; Ertas S; Alper E; Aksakal E; Riemma G; Angioni S; Vitale SG
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 May; 165(2):644-654. PubMed ID: 38013507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Oxidized, Regenerated Cellulose Adhesion Barrier Plus Intrauterine Device Prevents Recurrence After Adhesiolysis for Moderate to Severe Intrauterine Adhesions.
Cai H; Qiao L; Song K; He Y
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):80-88. PubMed ID: 27742483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dominant factors affecting reproductive outcomes of fertility-desiring young women with intrauterine adhesions.
Zhao J; Chen Q; Cai D; Duan Z; Li X; Xue X
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Apr; 295(4):923-927. PubMed ID: 28233115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Chitosan combined with intrauterine device prevents intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: A target trial emulation study.
Zhang H; Shao L; Wang L; Gao Y; Cui W; Chu D; Zhang Y
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Jun; 49(6):1571-1578. PubMed ID: 36869641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of the location and extent of intrauterine adhesions on recurrence after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis.
Yang JH; Chen CD; Chen SU; Yang YS; Chen MJ
BJOG; 2016 Mar; 123(4):618-23. PubMed ID: 25753391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of auto-cross-linked hyaluronic acid gel on pregnancy rate and hysteroscopic outcomes following surgical removal of intra-uterine adhesions.
Thubert T; Dussaux C; Demoulin G; Rivain AL; Trichot C; Deffieux X
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Oct; 193():65-9. PubMed ID: 26246163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of Hyaluronic Acid Gel and Intrauterine Devices in Prevention of Intrauterine Adhesions after Hysteroscopic Adhesiolysis in Infertile Women.
Trinh TT; Nguyen KD; Pham HV; Ho TV; Nguyen HT; O'Leary S; Le HTT; Pham HM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Feb; 29(2):284-290. PubMed ID: 34433103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intrauterine adhesions: What is the pregnancy rate after hysteroscopic management?
Capmas P; Mihalache A; Duminil L; Hor LS; Pourcelot AG; Fernandez H
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2020 Sep; 49(7):101797. PubMed ID: 32413519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Severity of intrauterine adhesions and pregnancy success rates after treatment: Comparison of adhesions obtained from open myomectomy versus uterine curettage.
Okohue JE; Ameh N; Adewole A
Afr J Reprod Health; 2022 Dec; 26(12):90-96. PubMed ID: 37585089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
