These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3509396)

  • 1. Methodology and evaluation of pharmacokinetic in vitro models of antimicrobial chemotherapy.
    Blaser J
    Chemioterapia; 1987 Jun; 6(2 Suppl):239. PubMed ID: 3509396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Methodology and evaluation of in-vitro models of antimicrobial chemotherapy. Proceedings of a joint meeting, 27-29 March 1984, organized by the Paul-Ehrlich-Gesellschaft für Chemotherapie and British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1985 Jan; 15 Suppl A():1-326. PubMed ID: 3980319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro models for prediction of antimicrobial activity: a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic perspective.
    Li RC; Zhu ZY
    J Chemother; 1997 May; 9 Suppl 1():55-63. PubMed ID: 9248963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breakpoints in in-vitro antibiotic sensitivity testing. Report by a working party of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1988 Jun; 21(6):701-10. PubMed ID: 3410798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Antimicrobial drug therapy and microbial sensitivity tests--antibiotics and microbial sensitivity tests].
    Kanno H
    Rinsho Byori; 1997 Jul; Suppl 105():174-81. PubMed ID: 9379537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bacterial inoculum and the activity of antimicrobial agents.
    Fry DE; Garrison RN; Trachtenberg L; Polk HC
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1985 Feb; 160(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 3969604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of antibacterial activity of cefpodoxime and cefixime in in vitro kinetic models.
    Liu P; Rand KH; Obermann B; Derendorf H
    Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2005 Feb; 25(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 15664481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laboratory tests for antimicrobial synergy.
    Peterson E
    Am J Med Technol; 1983 Nov; 49(11):775-7. PubMed ID: 6650558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria isolated from animals: considerations concerning the predefinition of breakpoints from the clinical pharmacological viewpoint].
    Kietzmann M; Böttner A; Hafez HM; Kehrenberg C; Klarmann D; Krabisch P; Kühn T; Luhofer G; Richter A; Schwarz S; Traeder W; Waldmann KH; Wallmann J; Werckenthin C; ;
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2004; 117(3-4):81-7. PubMed ID: 15046455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A rational approach to the selection of an antimicrobial agent.
    Hirsh DC; Ruehl WW
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1984 Nov; 185(10):1058-61. PubMed ID: 6392230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Proposals of the working group "Antibiotic resistance" for the configuration of microtitre plates to be used in routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacterial pathogens from infections of large food-producing animals and mastitis cases].
    Luhofer G; Böttner A; Hafez HM; Kaske M; Kehrenberg C; Kietzmann M; Klarmann D; Klein G; Krabisch P; Kühn T; Richter A; Sigge C; Traeder W; Waldmann KH; Wallmann J; Werckenthin C; Schwarz S;
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2004; 117(7-8):245-51. PubMed ID: 15298050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of in vitro activity of azithromycin against four different bacterial strains.
    Treyaprasert W; Schmidt S; Rand KH; Suvanakoot U; Derendorf H
    Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2007 Mar; 29(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 17194570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pharmacodynamics of antimicrobial agents. Bactericidal and postantibiotic effects.
    Levison ME
    Infect Dis Clin North Am; 1995 Sep; 9(3):483-95. PubMed ID: 7490429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Reliability of the bacterial identification tests and of antibiotic sensitivity tests made with automatic methods].
    Goffi M; Somenzi P; Magliani W; Menozzi MG
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1981 Mar; 17(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 7313071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The inoculum effect: fact or artifact?
    Craig WA; Bhavnani SM; Ambrose PG
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2004 Dec; 50(4):229-30. PubMed ID: 15582294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Determination of microorganism sensitivity to antibiotics by the diffusion-in-agar method with a semiquantitative evaluation of the results obtained].
    Givental' NI; Sobolev VR; Ved'mina EA; Bogdanova LF; Vorob'eva LS
    Lab Delo; 1982; (1):44-8. PubMed ID: 6174790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Determination of sensitivity of rapid growing bacteria by the MS-2-system. A comparison with conventional methods (author's transl)].
    Wiebe C; Linzenmeier G
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1981 Dec; 251(2):237-47. PubMed ID: 7200305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Sensitivity of gram negative bacilli to antimicrobial agents].
    Alés Reinlein JM; Vidal Massó LM; Cachón García F
    Rev Clin Esp; 1971 Jan; 120(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 5562473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the penem FCE 22101 and its orally absorbed ester FCE 22891.
    Bruna CD; Jabes D; Sebben G; Sanfilippo A
    G Ital Chemioter; 1983; 30(2-3):125-30. PubMed ID: 6329870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interpretation of disc diffusion susceptibility tests: a comparison of methods.
    Donnelly JP
    Med Lab Sci; 1985 Apr; 42(2):148-55. PubMed ID: 4068927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.