206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35094499)
1. Surrogate-based Bayesian calibration of biomechanical models with isotropic material behavior.
Römer U; Liu J; Böl M
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2022 Apr; 38(4):e3575. PubMed ID: 35094499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bayesian uncertainty quantification and propagation in molecular dynamics simulations: a high performance computing framework.
Angelikopoulos P; Papadimitriou C; Koumoutsakos P
J Chem Phys; 2012 Oct; 137(14):144103. PubMed ID: 23061835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Uncertainty quantification for constitutive model calibration of brain tissue.
Brewick PT; Teferra K
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Sep; 85():237-255. PubMed ID: 29935439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bayesian inference on a microstructural, hyperelastic model of tendon deformation.
Haughton J; Cotter SL; Parnell WJ; Shearer T
J R Soc Interface; 2022 May; 19(190):20220031. PubMed ID: 35582809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bayesian calibration of hyperelastic constitutive models of soft tissue.
Madireddy S; Sista B; Vemaganti K
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Jun; 59():108-127. PubMed ID: 26751706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bayesian calibration of process-based forest models: bridging the gap between models and data.
Van Oijen M; Rougier J; Smith R
Tree Physiol; 2005 Jul; 25(7):915-27. PubMed ID: 15870058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Bayesian method with nonlinear noise model to calibrate constitutive parameters of soft tissue.
Wang P; Yan Z; Du Z; Fu Y; Liu Z; Qu S; Zhuang Z
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Oct; 146():106070. PubMed ID: 37567066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Bayesian approach for estimating calibration curves and unknown concentrations in immunoassays.
Feng F; Sales AP; Kepler TB
Bioinformatics; 2011 Mar; 27(5):707-12. PubMed ID: 21149344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bayesian-based calibration for water quality model parameters.
Bai B; Dong F; Peng W; Liu X
Water Environ Res; 2023 Oct; 95(10):e10936. PubMed ID: 37807852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bayesian analysis of physiologically based toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic models.
Hack CE
Toxicology; 2006 Apr; 221(2-3):241-8. PubMed ID: 16466842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction uncertainty assessment of chromatography models using Bayesian inference.
Briskot T; Stückler F; Wittkopp F; Williams C; Yang J; Konrad S; Doninger K; Griesbach J; Bennecke M; Hepbildikler S; Hubbuch J
J Chromatogr A; 2019 Feb; 1587():101-110. PubMed ID: 30579636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantifying the uncertainty in model parameters using Gaussian process-based Markov chain Monte Carlo in cardiac electrophysiology.
Dhamala J; Arevalo HJ; Sapp J; Horácek BM; Wu KC; Trayanova NA; Wang L
Med Image Anal; 2018 Aug; 48():43-57. PubMed ID: 29843078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adaptive Markov chain Monte Carlo forward projection for statistical analysis in epidemic modelling of human papillomavirus.
Korostil IA; Peters GW; Cornebise J; Regan DG
Stat Med; 2013 May; 32(11):1917-53. PubMed ID: 22961869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantifying Registration Uncertainty With Sparse Bayesian Modelling.
Le Folgoc L; Delingette H; Criminisi A; Ayache N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2017 Feb; 36(2):607-617. PubMed ID: 27831863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The cost-effectiveness of basiliximab induction in "old-to-old" kidney transplant programs: Bayesian estimation, simulation, and uncertainty analysis.
Emparan C; Wolters H; Laukötte M; Senninger N
Transplant Proc; 2005 Jun; 37(5):2069-71. PubMed ID: 15964341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Uncertainty in cardiac myofiber orientation and stiffnesses dominate the variability of left ventricle deformation response.
Rodríguez-Cantano R; Sundnes J; Rognes ME
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2019 May; 35(5):e3178. PubMed ID: 30632711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An adaptive Kriging surrogate method for efficient joint estimation of hydraulic and biochemical parameters in reactive transport modeling.
Zhou J; Su X; Cui G
J Contam Hydrol; 2018 Sep; 216():50-57. PubMed ID: 30170768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Experiments and hyperelastic modeling of porcine meniscus show heterogeneity at high strains.
Long T; Shende S; Lin CY; Vemaganti K
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2022 Dec; 21(6):1641-1658. PubMed ID: 35882676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved strategies and optimization of calibration models for real-time PCR absolute quantification.
Sivaganesan M; Haugland RA; Chern EC; Shanks OC
Water Res; 2010 Sep; 44(16):4726-35. PubMed ID: 20701947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Towards efficient uncertainty quantification in complex and large-scale biomechanical problems based on a Bayesian multi-fidelity scheme.
Biehler J; Gee MW; Wall WA
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2015 Jun; 14(3):489-513. PubMed ID: 25245816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
