BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

444 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35094793)

  • 1. Cost-Effectiveness of Cemiplimab Versus Standard of Care in the United States for First-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression ≥50.
    Kuznik A; Smare C; Chen CI; Venkatachalam M; Keeping S; Atsou K; Xu Y; Wilson F; Guyot P; Chan K; Glowienka E; Konidaris G
    Value Health; 2022 Feb; 25(2):203-214. PubMed ID: 35094793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab monotherapy versus chemotherapy for previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
    Aziz MIA; Tan LE; Tan WHG; Toh CK; Loke LPY; Pearce F; Ng K
    J Med Econ; 2020 Sep; 23(9):952-960. PubMed ID: 32462958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost effectiveness of pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy as first-line treatment for metastatic NSCLC that expresses high levels of PD-L1 in Switzerland.
    Bhadhuri A; Insinga R; Guggisberg P; Panje C; Schwenkglenks M
    Swiss Med Wkly; 2019 Dec; 149():w20170. PubMed ID: 31880807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with PD-L1 tumor proportion score 1% or greater.
    She L; Hu H; Liao M; Xia X; Shi Y; Yao L; Ding D; Zhu Y; Zeng S; Shen L; Huang J; Carbone DP
    Lung Cancer; 2019 Dec; 138():88-94. PubMed ID: 31655368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness analysis of cemiplimab vs pembrolizumab for treatment of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.
    Paul E; Konidaris G; Cope S; Chen CI; Keeping S; Xu Y; Atsou K; Ayers D; Guyot P; Sasane M; Mojebi A; Kuznik A
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2021 Nov; 27(11):1513-1525. PubMed ID: 34351214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in PD-L1-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in the USA.
    Huang M; Lopes GL; Insinga RP; Burke T; Ejzykowicz F; Zhang Y; Feliciano JL
    Immunotherapy; 2019 Dec; 11(17):1463-1478. PubMed ID: 31738117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. First-line pembrolizumab in PD-L1 positive non-small-cell lung cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis from the UK health care perspective.
    Hu X; Hay JW
    Lung Cancer; 2018 Sep; 123():166-171. PubMed ID: 30089590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus standard-of-care chemotherapy for first-line treatment of PD-L1 positive (>50%) metastatic squamous and non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in France.
    Chouaid C; Bensimon L; Clay E; Millier A; Levy-Bachelot L; Huang M; Levy P
    Lung Cancer; 2019 Jan; 127():44-52. PubMed ID: 30642550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab vs. Standard-of-Care Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic NSCLC that Expresses High Levels of PD-L1 in the United States.
    Huang M; Lou Y; Pellissier J; Burke T; Liu FX; Xu R; Velcheti V
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Aug; 35(8):831-844. PubMed ID: 28620848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. First-line Cemiplimab versus Standard Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with at Least 50% Programmed Cell Death Receptor Ligand-1 Positivity: Analysis of Cost-effectiveness.
    Zhang M; Liu X; Wen F; Wu Q; Zhou K; Bai L; Li Q
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2022 Mar; 34(3):e123-e129. PubMed ID: 34736841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab for Patients with Advanced, Unresectable, or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer Ineligible for Cisplatin-based Therapy.
    Patterson K; Prabhu V; Xu R; Li H; Meng Y; Zarabi N; Zhong Y; Batteson R; Pellissier J; Keefe S; Grivas P; de Wit R
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 2(5):565-571. PubMed ID: 31412011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for previously untreated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in the USA.
    Zeng X; Wan X; Peng L; Peng Y; Ma F; Liu Q; Tan C
    BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e031019. PubMed ID: 31831534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with varying comorbidity burden.
    Criss SD; Palazzo L; Watson TR; Paquette AM; Sigel K; Wisnivesky J; Kong CY
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0228288. PubMed ID: 31995619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the Value of Cemiplimab for Adults With Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Konidaris G; Paul E; Kuznik A; Keeping S; Chen CI; Sasane M; Xu Y; Atsou K; Ayers D; Ruiz ES; Khushalani NI; Cope S
    Value Health; 2021 Mar; 24(3):377-387. PubMed ID: 33641772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The cost effectiveness of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy or atezolizumab as second-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma in the United States.
    Slater RL; Lai Y; Zhong Y; Li H; Meng Y; Moreno BH; Godwin JL; Frenkl T; Sonpavde GP; Mamtani R
    J Med Econ; 2020 Sep; 23(9):967-977. PubMed ID: 32412387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cemiplimab monotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 of at least 50%: a multicentre, open-label, global, phase 3, randomised, controlled trial.
    Sezer A; Kilickap S; Gümüş M; Bondarenko I; Özgüroğlu M; Gogishvili M; Turk HM; Cicin I; Bentsion D; Gladkov O; Clingan P; Sriuranpong V; Rizvi N; Gao B; Li S; Lee S; McGuire K; Chen CI; Makharadze T; Paydas S; Nechaeva M; Seebach F; Weinreich DM; Yancopoulos GD; Gullo G; Lowy I; Rietschel P
    Lancet; 2021 Feb; 397(10274):592-604. PubMed ID: 33581821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Cemiplimab Versus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment in Advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 Expression Levels of at Least 50.
    Wang L; Peng Y; Zeng X; Peng L; Li S; Qin S; Wan X; Tan C
    Adv Ther; 2021 Aug; 38(8):4354-4365. PubMed ID: 34241780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy with PD-L1 test for the first-line treatment of NSCLC.
    Wan N; Zhang TT; Hua SH; Lu ZL; Ji B; Li LX; Lu LQ; Huang WJ; Jiang J; Li J
    Cancer Med; 2020 Mar; 9(5):1683-1693. PubMed ID: 31945265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.
    Liu Q; Tan C; Yi L; Wan X; Peng L; Li J; Luo X; Zeng X
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0258605. PubMed ID: 34780478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy in the 1st line treatment of non-squamous NSCLC in the US.
    Insinga RP; Vanness DJ; Feliciano JL; Vandormael K; Traore S; Burke T
    J Med Econ; 2018 Dec; 21(12):1191-1205. PubMed ID: 30188231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.