162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35095041)
1. Three-dimensional fit of self-glazed zirconia monolithic crowns fabricated by wet deposition.
Li Y; Zhao J; Sun Z; Lin N; Zheng Y
Dent Mater J; 2022 May; 41(3):363-367. PubMed ID: 35095041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adaptation and uniformity of monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by additive 3-dimensional gel deposition.
Sun Z; Shen Z; Zhao J; Zheng Y
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Dec; 130(6):859-865. PubMed ID: 35135676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of fit and accuracy of single crowns fabricated from self-glazed zirconia compared with milled zirconia.
Marouki C; Shamon A; Svanborg P
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1105-1110. PubMed ID: 36959004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Fit of a CAD/CAM Monolithic Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Porcelain Laminate Veneer System.
Baig MR; Akbar AA; Sabti MY; Behbehani Z
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jul; 31(6):502-511. PubMed ID: 34608712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital evaluation of the effect of nanosilica-lithium spray coating on the internal and marginal fit of high translucent zirconia crowns.
Liang S; Yuan F; Chen H; Sun Y
J Dent; 2023 May; 132():104503. PubMed ID: 37001793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Marginal fit of monolithic versus layered zirconia crowns assessed with 2 marginal gap methods.
Fasih P; Tavakolizadeh S; Sedaghat Monfared M; Sofi-Mahmudi A; Yari A
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Aug; 130(2):250.e1-250.e7. PubMed ID: 37451899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal Discrepancies of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: The Influence of Preparation Designs and Sintering Techniques.
Ahmed WM; Abdallah MN; McCullagh AP; Wyatt CCL; Troczynski T; Carvalho RM
J Prosthodont; 2019 Mar; 28(3):288-298. PubMed ID: 30656786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the Accuracy of Fit of Metal, Zirconia, and Lithium Disilicate Crowns Made from Different Manufacturing Techniques.
Al Hamad KQ; Al Quran FA; AlJalam SA; Baba NZ
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jun; 28(5):497-503. PubMed ID: 30719780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital evaluation of the fit of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate crowns with a new three-dimensional approach.
Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
Quintessence Int; 2018; 49(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 29192293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Knife-edged crown fabricated by 3-dimensional gel deposition and soft milling.
Li R; Li W; Wang Y; Sun Y
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; 129(1):174-180. PubMed ID: 34052028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital assessment of marginal accuracy in ceramic crowns fabricated with different marginal finish line configurations.
Faruqi S; Ganji KK; Bandela V; Nagarajappa AK; Mohamed RN; Ahmed MA; Farhan M; Alwakid WN; Al-Hammad KAS; Alam MK
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Jul; 34(5):789-795. PubMed ID: 34668306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of cement space on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated monolithic zirconia crowns.
Kale E; Seker E; Yilmaz B; Özcelik TB
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Dec; 116(6):890-895. PubMed ID: 27460314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marginal Adaptation of Monolithic High-Translucency Versus Porcelain-Veneered Zirconia Crowns.
Rayyan MR
Int J Prosthodont; 2019; 32(4):364-366. PubMed ID: 31283817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Marginal gap and internal fit of 3D printed versus milled monolithic zirconia crowns.
Refaie A; Fouda A; Bourauel C; Singer L
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jul; 23(1):448. PubMed ID: 37403169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A micro-computed tomography analysis of internal and marginal fits of fixed partial dentures: Effect of preparation finish line designs on monolithic zirconia and heat-pressed zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate.
Elsherbini M; Sakrana AA; Amin RA; Diaa M; Özcan M; Al-Zordk W
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):90-99. PubMed ID: 36718906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia molar crowns with reduced thickness.
Nakamura K; Harada A; Inagaki R; Kanno T; Niwano Y; Milleding P; Örtengren U
Acta Odontol Scand; 2015; 73(8):602-8. PubMed ID: 25635734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of build angle on the dimensional accuracy of monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated with the nanoparticle jetting technique.
Lyu J; Yang X; Li Y; Tan J; Liu X
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Oct; 130(4):613.e1-613.e8. PubMed ID: 37633729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro evaluation of marginal discrepancy of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated with different CAD-CAM systems.
Hamza TA; Sherif RM
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):762-766. PubMed ID: 27836145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture load of ceramic restorations after fatigue loading.
Baladhandayutham B; Lawson NC; Burgess JO
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 25985741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
Ahrberg D; Lauer HC; Ahrberg M; Weigl P
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 26070435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
