105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3509627)
1. [Esthetics and orthodontics].
Ktistaki M
Orthod Fr; 1987; 58 Pt 2():747-58. PubMed ID: 3509627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Esthetics and orthodontics].
Orthod Fr; 1991; 62 Pt 2():433-527. PubMed ID: 1749609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [The nose and the development of the soft tissue profile].
LeJoyeux E; Flageul F
Rev Orthop Dento Faciale; 1984 Oct; 18(4):425-41. PubMed ID: 6597953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Soft-tissue facial characteristics of attractive and normal adolescent boys and girls.
Sforza C; Laino A; D'Alessio R; Grandi G; Tartaglia GM; Ferrario VF
Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):799-807. PubMed ID: 18298221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Integration of parts in the facial skeleton and cervical vertebrae.
McCane B; Kean MR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):e13-30. PubMed ID: 21195254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Oral profile and dental occlusion in corrected malocclusion cases].
Heckmann U
Dtsch Stomatol; 1971 Mar; 21(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 5279967
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparisons and measurements of classifications. Apropos of judgments on esthetics].
Dangy B
Orthod Fr; 1976; 47(0):385-99. PubMed ID: 1070664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Soft-tissue profile changes concurrent with the orthodontic treatment.
Attarzadeh F; Adenwalla ST
Int J Orthod; 1984 Dec; 22(4):4-13. PubMed ID: 6597812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A cephalometric study of the soft tissue changes during and after orthodontic treatment.
Angelle PL
Trans Eur Orthod Soc; 1973; ():267-80. PubMed ID: 4533637
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Can we justify a global model of facial attractiveness and beauty?
Abdel-Kader HM
Aust Orthod J; 2006 May; 22(1):71-2. PubMed ID: 16792249
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of profile esthetic change with mandibular advancement surgery.
Shelly AD; Southard TE; Southard KA; Casko JS; Jakobsen JR; Fridrich KL; Mergen JL
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):630-7. PubMed ID: 10842105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Orthodontics and esthetics].
Aknin JJ
Orthod Fr; 1991; 62 Pt 1():137-90. PubMed ID: 2067792
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of well-balanced lip position by Japanese orthodontic patients.
Shimomura T; Ioi H; Nakata S; Counts AL
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):e291-7. PubMed ID: 21457834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The contribution of mandibular positioned variation to facial esthetics.
Dongieux J; Sassouni V
Angle Orthod; 1980 Oct; 50(4):334-9. PubMed ID: 6935983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of presurgical infant orthopedics on facial esthetics in complete bilateral cleft lip and palate.
Brogan WF
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1994 Sep; 31(5):410-1. PubMed ID: 7986803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Orthodontic and surgical considerations in use of the mandibular sagittal ramus split for class II skeletal anomalies.
Kraal ER; Valk PJ
J Oral Surg; 1981 Nov; 39(11):842-8. PubMed ID: 6945410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Esthetics of the face and teeth].
Philippe J
Orthod Fr; 1991; 62 Pt 2():423-32. PubMed ID: 1749608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Consensus of esthetic opinion, consensus of therapeutic opinion of orthodontists].
Sassouni V
Orthod Fr; 1973; 44(2):3-90. PubMed ID: 4534457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The mandibular dental arch: part II. Effects of lower incisor position on the soft tissue profile.
Schulhof RJ; Zierenberg RH; Walters RD
Angle Orthod; 1978 Jan; 48(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 272134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A multi-dimensional orthodontic and prosthodontic study cast analysis.
Byland J
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2003; 14(3):9-14. PubMed ID: 14596154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
