149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35096590)
1. Pretherapeutic Assessment of Pancreatic Cancer: Comparison of FDG PET/CT Plus Delayed PET/MR and Contrast-Enhanced CT/MR.
Zhang Z; Zhou N; Guo X; Li N; Zhu H; Yang Z
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():790462. PubMed ID: 35096590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preoperative Assessment of Pancreatic Cancer with FDG PET/MR Imaging versus FDG PET/CT Plus Contrast-enhanced Multidetector CT: A Prospective Preliminary Study.
Joo I; Lee JM; Lee DH; Lee ES; Paeng JC; Lee SJ; Jang JY; Kim SW; Ryu JK; Lee KB
Radiology; 2017 Jan; 282(1):149-159. PubMed ID: 27556273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The value of
Wang W; Wang S; Huang X; Meng H; Jiang Y; Li B; Chen K; Shen B; Lin X
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Mar; 13(3):1768-1778. PubMed ID: 36915309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Non-small cell lung cancer: whole-body MR examination for M-stage assessment--utility for whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging compared with integrated FDG PET/CT.
Ohno Y; Koyama H; Onishi Y; Takenaka D; Nogami M; Yoshikawa T; Matsumoto S; Kotani Y; Sugimura K
Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):643-54. PubMed ID: 18539889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of CE-FDG-PET/CT with CE-FDG-PET/MR in the evaluation of osseous metastases in breast cancer patients.
Catalano OA; Nicolai E; Rosen BR; Luongo A; Catalano M; Iannace C; Guimaraes A; Vangel MG; Mahmood U; Soricelli A; Salvatore M
Br J Cancer; 2015 Apr; 112(9):1452-60. PubMed ID: 25871331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of occult primary tumors in patients with cervical metastases of unknown primary tumors: comparison of (18)F FDG PET/CT with contrast-enhanced CT or CT/MR imaging-prospective study.
Lee JR; Kim JS; Roh JL; Lee JH; Baek JH; Cho KJ; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):764-71. PubMed ID: 25405771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Protocol requirements and diagnostic value of PET/MR imaging for liver metastasis detection.
Reiner CS; Stolzmann P; Husmann L; Burger IA; Hüllner MW; Schaefer NG; Schneider PM; von Schulthess GK; Veit-Haibach P
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2014 Apr; 41(4):649-58. PubMed ID: 24346415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic accuracy of CE-CT, MRI and FDG PET/CT for detecting colorectal cancer liver metastases in patients considered eligible for hepatic resection and/or local ablation.
Sivesgaard K; Larsen LP; Sørensen M; Kramer S; Schlander S; Amanavicius N; Bharadwaz A; Tønner Nielsen D; Viborg Mortensen F; Morre Pedersen E
Eur Radiol; 2018 Nov; 28(11):4735-4747. PubMed ID: 29736846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. N stage disease in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: efficacy of quantitative and qualitative assessment with STIR turbo spin-echo imaging, diffusion-weighted MR imaging, and fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT.
Ohno Y; Koyama H; Yoshikawa T; Nishio M; Aoyama N; Onishi Y; Takenaka D; Matsumoto S; Maniwa Y; Nishio W; Nishimura Y; Itoh T; Sugimura K
Radiology; 2011 Nov; 261(2):605-15. PubMed ID: 21926377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound, ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT, and fused ¹⁸F-FDG-PET-MR images with DWI for the detection of cervical lymph node metastases of HNSCC.
Heusch P; Sproll C; Buchbender C; Rieser E; Terjung J; Antke C; Boeck I; Macht S; Scherer A; Antoch G; Heusner TA; Handschel J
Clin Oral Investig; 2014 Apr; 18(3):969-78. PubMed ID: 23892450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrast-enhanced 18F-FDG PET/CT: 1-stop-shop imaging for assessing the resectability of pancreatic cancer.
Strobel K; Heinrich S; Bhure U; Soyka J; Veit-Haibach P; Pestalozzi BC; Clavien PA; Hany TF
J Nucl Med; 2008 Sep; 49(9):1408-13. PubMed ID: 18703604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Whole-Body (18)F FDG PET/MR Imaging and Whole-Body (18)F FDG PET/CT in Terms of Lesion Detection and Radiation Dose in Patients with Breast Cancer.
Melsaether AN; Raad RA; Pujara AC; Ponzo FD; Pysarenko KM; Jhaveri K; Babb JS; Sigmund EE; Kim SG; Moy LA
Radiology; 2016 Oct; 281(1):193-202. PubMed ID: 27023002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Whole-body MR imaging vs. FDG-PET: comparison of accuracy of M-stage diagnosis for lung cancer patients.
Ohno Y; Koyama H; Nogami M; Takenaka D; Yoshikawa T; Yoshimura M; Kotani Y; Nishimura Y; Higashino T; Sugimura K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Sep; 26(3):498-509. PubMed ID: 17729341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Whole-body FDG PET/CT is more accurate than conventional imaging for staging primary breast cancer patients.
Riegger C; Herrmann J; Nagarajah J; Hecktor J; Kuemmel S; Otterbach F; Hahn S; Bockisch A; Lauenstein T; Antoch G; Heusner TA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2012 May; 39(5):852-63. PubMed ID: 22392069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Positron emission tomography and computed tomography with [
Pang Y; Zhao L; Shang Q; Meng T; Zhao L; Feng L; Wang S; Guo P; Wu X; Lin Q; Wu H; Huang W; Sun L; Chen H
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Mar; 49(4):1322-1337. PubMed ID: 34651226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Non-small cell lung cancer staging: efficacy comparison of integrated PET/CT versus 3.0-T whole-body MR imaging.
Yi CA; Shin KM; Lee KS; Kim BT; Kim H; Kwon OJ; Choi JY; Chung MJ
Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):632-42. PubMed ID: 18552311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-way Comparison of Whole-Body MR, Coregistered Whole-Body FDG PET/MR, and Integrated Whole-Body FDG PET/CT Imaging: TNM and Stage Assessment Capability for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.
Ohno Y; Koyama H; Yoshikawa T; Takenaka D; Seki S; Yui M; Yamagata H; Aoyagi K; Matsumoto S; Sugimura K
Radiology; 2015 Jun; 275(3):849-61. PubMed ID: 25584709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pulmonary lesion assessment: comparison of whole-body hybrid MR/PET and PET/CT imaging--pilot study.
Schwenzer NF; Schraml C; Müller M; Brendle C; Sauter A; Spengler W; Pfannenberg AC; Claussen CD; Schmidt H
Radiology; 2012 Aug; 264(2):551-8. PubMed ID: 22653189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pretherapeutic evaluation of patients with upper gastrointestinal tract cancer using endoscopic and laparoscopic ultrasonography.
Mortensen MB
Dan Med J; 2012 Dec; 59(12):B4568. PubMed ID: 23290296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
