These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35098085)

  • 1. Measurement of Intraocular Pressure with Applanation, Dynamic Contour, and Air-Puff Tonometers: A Comparative Study in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Healthy Cases.
    Özbilen KT; Kocabora MS
    Beyoglu Eye J; 2020; 5(3):178-187. PubMed ID: 35098085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: Difference of Intraocular Pressure Values Between Eyes with and without Glaucomatous Damage in Thin Corneas].
    Umurhan Akkan JC; Akkan F; Sezgin Akcay BI; Ayintap E; Tuncer K
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2015 Oct; 232(10):1190-7. PubMed ID: 26512850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Clinical evaluation of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer].
    Detry-Morel M; Jamart J; Detry MB; Ledoux A; Pourjavan S
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2007 Mar; 30(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 17417152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. IOP measured by dynamic contour tonometry correlates with IOP measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry in Japanese individuals.
    Ito K; Tawara A; Kubota T; Harada Y
    J Glaucoma; 2012 Jan; 21(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 21173706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dynamic contour tonometry in primary open angle glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma: factors associated with intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude.
    Moghimi S; Torabi H; Fakhraie G; Nassiri N; Mohammadi M
    Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2013; 20(2):158-62. PubMed ID: 23741135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
    Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physiological diurnal variability and characteristics of the ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) with the dynamic contour tonometer (DCT-Pascal).
    Pourjavan S; Boëlle PY; Detry-Morel M; De Potter P
    Int Ophthalmol; 2007 Dec; 27(6):357-60. PubMed ID: 17955180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude comparisons in different types of glaucoma using dynamic contour tonometry.
    Punjabi OS; Ho HK; Kniestedt C; Bostrom AG; Stamper RL; Lin SC
    Curr Eye Res; 2006 Oct; 31(10):851-62. PubMed ID: 17050277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Reproducibility of dynamic contour tonometry. Comparison with TonoPenXL and Goldmann applanation tonometry - a clinical study on 323 normal eyes].
    Viestenz A; Langenbucher A; Viestenz A
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Oct; 223(10):813-9. PubMed ID: 17063423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and goldmann tonometry.
    Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Vico E; Fernandez-Vidal A; Benitez del Castillo JM; Wasfi M; Garcia-Sanchez J
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Dec; 113(12):2156-62. PubMed ID: 16996599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry, Goldmann and pneumotonometer in ocular hypertension patients and their relationship to pachymetry and ocular pulse amplitude].
    Colás-Tomás T; Prieto-Del Cura M; Villafruela-Güemes I; Clariana-Martín A; Valdivia-Pérez A
    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2012 Dec; 87(12):401-6. PubMed ID: 23121701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma.
    Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Brusini P
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 May; 85(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 17488456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the Pascal dynamic contour, Canon TX-10 non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometers in healthy subjects.
    Pelit A; Altan-Yaycioglu R; Pelit A; Akova YA
    Clin Exp Optom; 2009 Jan; 92(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 18637107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in African American subjects.
    Medeiros FA; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Apr; 114(4):658-65. PubMed ID: 17141320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intraocular pressure measured by dynamic contour tonometer and ocular response analyzer in normal tension glaucoma.
    Morita T; Shoji N; Kamiya K; Hagishima M; Fujimura F; Shimizu K
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 248(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 19693527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Goldmann applanation, non-contact, dynamic contour and tonopen tonometry measurements in healthy and glaucomatous eyes, and effect of central corneal thickness on the measurement results.
    Yildiz A; Yasar T
    Med Glas (Zenica); 2018 Aug; 15(2):152-157. PubMed ID: 30047543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of current tonometry techniques in measurement of intraocular pressure.
    Kouchaki B; Hashemi H; Yekta A; Khabazkhoob M
    J Curr Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 29(2):92-97. PubMed ID: 28626817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes.
    Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Feb; 23(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 18219335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of IOP measurement by ocular response analyzer, dynamic contour, Goldmann applanation, and noncontact tonometry.
    Oncel B; Dinc U; Orge F; Yalvac B
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(6):936-41. PubMed ID: 19882585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analyzer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.
    Vandewalle E; Vandenbroeck S; Stalmans I; Zeyen T
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(5):783-9. PubMed ID: 19787598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.