146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35099025)
1. Features of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and factors affecting the re-bleeding risk.
Uysal E; Acar YA
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg; 2022 Jan; 28(2):147-154. PubMed ID: 35099025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score and modified Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score in predicting outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: An accuracy and calibration study.
Akhila Arya PV; Thulaseedharan NK; Raj R; Unnikrishnan DC; Jacob A
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Aug; 42(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 37382854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of a new risk score system for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Kim MS; Moon HS; Kwon IS; Park JH; Kim JS; Kang SH; Sung JK; Lee ES; Kim SH; Lee BS; Jeong HY
BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):193. PubMed ID: 32552662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring approaches in predicting the risk of in-hospital death among emergency hospitalized patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective observational study in Nanjing, China.
Gu L; Xu F; Yuan J
BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):98. PubMed ID: 29954332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
Yaka E; Yılmaz S; Doğan NÖ; Pekdemir M
Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin.
Shafaghi A; Gharibpoor F; Mahdipour Z; Samadani AA
Rom J Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 57(4):322-333. PubMed ID: 31268861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.
Stanley AJ; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu JH; Schultz M; Abazi R; Zakko L; Thornton S; Wilkinson K; Khor CJ; Murray IA; Laursen SB;
BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6432. PubMed ID: 28053181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.
Robertson M; Majumdar A; Boyapati R; Chung W; Worland T; Terbah R; Wei J; Lontos S; Angus P; Vaughan R
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scoring systems used to predict mortality in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the ED.
Tang Y; Shen J; Zhang F; Zhou X; Tang Z; You T
Am J Emerg Med; 2018 Jan; 36(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 28673695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. External validation and comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford score, modified Glasgow-Blatchford score, Rockall score and AIMS65 score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a cross-sectional observational study in Western Switzerland.
Rivieri S; Carron PN; Schoepfer A; Ageron FX
Eur J Emerg Med; 2023 Feb; 30(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 36542335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Kim MS; Choi J; Shin WC
BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):136. PubMed ID: 31349816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of three scoring systems for risk stratification in elderly patients wıth acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Kalkan Ç; Soykan I; Karakaya F; Tüzün A; Gençtürk ZB
Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2017 Apr; 17(4):575-583. PubMed ID: 27075860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems for the prediction of the risk of in-hospital death among patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Lu X; Zhang X; Chen H
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2020 Jun; 112(6):467-473. PubMed ID: 32379473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of risk scoring systems for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients after renal transplantation: a retrospective observational study in Hunan, China.
Wang R; Wang Q
BMC Gastroenterol; 2022 Jul; 22(1):353. PubMed ID: 35879668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of AIMS65 and Glasgow Blatchford scores in predicting mortality in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Ak R; Hökenek NM
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2021 Jun; 67(5):766-770. PubMed ID: 34550270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage re-bleeding risk according to the Glasgow-Blatchford scale: a triage tool.
Olivarec-Bonilla M; García-Montano AM; Herrera-Arellano A
Gac Med Mex; 2020; 156(6):493-498. PubMed ID: 33877114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison between Glascow-Blatchford, Rockall and AIMS65 scores in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a hospital in Lima, Peru].
Espinoza-Ríos J; Aguilar Sánchez V; Bravo Paredes EA; Pinto Valdivia J; Huerta-Mercado Tenorio J
Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2016; 36(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 27409091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of adverse outcomes using non-endoscopic scoring systems in patients over 80 years of age who present with the upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
Bardakçı O; Sıddıkoğlu D; Akdur G; Şimşek G; Atalay Ü; Das M; Akdur O; Beyazit Y
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg; 2022 Jan; 28(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 34967427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding.
Chen IC; Hung MS; Chiu TF; Chen JC; Hsiao CT
Am J Emerg Med; 2007 Sep; 25(7):774-9. PubMed ID: 17870480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective validation of the Glasgow Blatchford scoring system in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
Köksal Ö; Özeren G; Özdemır F; Armağan E; Aydin Ş; Ayyildiz T
Turk J Gastroenterol; 2012; 23(5):448-55. PubMed ID: 23161321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
