136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35100445)
1. Technical note: Design and initial evaluation of a novel physical breast phantom to monitor image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Fitton I; Noël A; Minassian J; Zerhouni M; Wojak J; Adel M; Fournier L
Med Phys; 2022 Apr; 49(4):2355-2365. PubMed ID: 35100445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects on image quality of a 2D antiscatter grid in x-ray digital breast tomosynthesis: Initial experience using the dual modality (x-ray and molecular) breast tomosynthesis scanner.
Patel T; Peppard H; Williams MB
Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1720. PubMed ID: 27036570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality control for digital tomosynthesis in the ECOG-ACRIN EA1151 TMIST trial.
Maki AK; Mawdsley GE; Mainprize JG; Pisano ED; Shen SZ; Alonzo-Proulx O; Yaffe MJ
Med Phys; 2023 Dec; 50(12):7441-7461. PubMed ID: 37830895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast detail phantom comparison on a commercially available unit. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) versus full-field digital mammography (FFDM).
Bertolini M; Nitrosi A; Borasi G; Botti A; Tassoni D; Sghedoni R; Zuccoli G
J Digit Imaging; 2011 Feb; 24(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 20131074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Image quality of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: effects of projection-view distributions.
Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Goodsitt M; Carson PL; Hadjiiski L; Schmitz A; Eberhard JW; Claus BE
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5703-12. PubMed ID: 21992385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of a chest digital tomosynthesis R/F system and implementation of low-dose GPU-accelerated compressed sensing (CS) image reconstruction.
Choi S; Lee H; Lee D; Choi S; Lee CL; Kwon W; Shin J; Seo CW; Kim HJ
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1871-1888. PubMed ID: 29500855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of exposure equalization on image signal-to-noise ratios in digital mammography: a simulation study with an anthropomorphic breast phantom.
Liu X; Lai CJ; Whitman GJ; Geiser WR; Shen Y; Yi Y; Shaw CC
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6489-501. PubMed ID: 22149832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimal photon energy comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and mammography: a case study.
Di Maria S; Baptista M; Felix M; Oliveira N; Matela N; Janeiro L; Vaz P; Orvalho L; Silva A
Phys Med; 2014 Jun; 30(4):482-8. PubMed ID: 24613514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison study of reconstruction algorithms for prototype digital breast tomosynthesis using various breast phantoms.
Kim YS; Park HS; Lee HH; Choi YW; Choi JG; Kim HH; Kim HJ
Radiol Med; 2016 Feb; 121(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 26383027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigating simulation-based metrics for characterizing linear iterative reconstruction in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Rose SD; Sanchez AA; Sidky EY; Pan X
Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):e279-e296. PubMed ID: 28901614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In-plane image quality and NPWE detectability index in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Monnin P; Verdun FR; Bosmans H; Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2020 May; 65(9):095013. PubMed ID: 32191923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative power law analysis of structured breast phantom and patient images in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
Cockmartin L; Bosmans H; Marshall NW
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081920. PubMed ID: 23927334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variation in digital breast tomosynthesis image quality at differing heights above the detector.
Davidson R; Al Khalifah K; Zhou A
J Med Radiat Sci; 2022 Jun; 69(2):174-181. PubMed ID: 34957671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Total variation minimization filter for DBT imaging.
Mota AM; Matela N; Oliveira N; Almeida P
Med Phys; 2015 Jun; 42(6):2827-36. PubMed ID: 26127035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reduced anatomical clutter in digital breast tomosynthesis with statistical iterative reconstruction.
Garrett JW; Li Y; Li K; Chen GH
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2009-2022. PubMed ID: 29542821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiscale bilateral filtering for improving image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Hadjiiski LM; Samala RK
Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):182-95. PubMed ID: 25563259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new breast phantom suitable for digital mammography, contrast-enhanced digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
Zhang C; Fu J
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Feb; 68(4):. PubMed ID: 36696693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Selective-diffusion regularization for enhancement of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.
Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Hadjiiski LM
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):6003-14. PubMed ID: 21158312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How does c-view image quality compare with conventional 2D FFDM?
Nelson JS; Wells JR; Baker JA; Samei E
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2538. PubMed ID: 27147364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improved digital breast tomosynthesis images using automated ultrasound.
Zhang X; Yuan J; Du S; Kripfgans OD; Wang X; Carson PL; Liu X
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061911. PubMed ID: 24877822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
