124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35102097)
1. Beyond traditional subjective refraction.
Rodriguez-Lopez V; Dorronsoro C
Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2022 May; 33(3):228-234. PubMed ID: 35102097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new subjective refraction method--the meridional polarized vernier optometer.
Salmon TO; Horner DG
J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Oct; 67(10):599-605. PubMed ID: 8942132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Comparison Between Refraction From an Adaptive Optics Visual Simulator and Clinical Refractions.
Tabernero J; Otero C; Pardhan S
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2020 Jun; 9(7):23. PubMed ID: 32832229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of refraction--a literature review.
Goss DA; Grosvenor T
J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Oct; 67(10):619-30. PubMed ID: 8942135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Subjective refraction of the peripheral field using contrast detection acuity.
Wang YZ; Thibos LN; Lopez N; Salmon T; Bradley A
J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Oct; 67(10):584-9. PubMed ID: 8942130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical evaluation of an automated subjective refraction method implemented in a computer-controlled motorized phoropter.
Otero C; Aldaba M; Pujol J
J Optom; 2019; 12(2):74-83. PubMed ID: 30389250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction.
Pesudovs K; Parker KE; Cheng H; Applegate RA
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 17502821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Incidence of refractive errors with corrective aids subsequent selection].
Benes P; Synek S; Petrová S; Sokolová SJ; Forýtková L; Holoubková Z
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2012 Feb; 68(1):11-4, 16. PubMed ID: 22679692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Reliability and Acceptability of RDx-Based Tele-Controlled Subjective Refraction Compared with Traditional Subjective Refraction.
Huang J; Li X; Yan T; Wen L; Pan L; Yang Z
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2022 Nov; 11(11):16. PubMed ID: 36394842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating Self-Refraction and Ready-Made Spectacles for Treatment of Uncorrected Refractive Error.
Camp AS; Shane TS; Kang J; Thomas B; Pole C; Lee RK
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2018; 25(5-6):392-398. PubMed ID: 30118609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical Comparison of High-resolution and Standard Refractions and Prescriptions.
Meyer D; Rickert M; Reed O; Joret P; Kollbaum P
Optom Vis Sci; 2023 Nov; 100(11):751-760. PubMed ID: 37861987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Agreement Between Autorefraction and Subjective Refraction in Keraring-Implanted Keratoconic Eyes.
Al-Tuwairqi WS; Ogbuehi KC; Razzouk H; Alanazi MA; Osuagwu UL
Eye Contact Lens; 2017 Mar; 43(2):116-122. PubMed ID: 26825280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical Accuracy of the Nidek ARK-1 Autorefractor.
Paudel N; Adhikari S; Thakur A; Shrestha B; Loughman J
Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Jun; 96(6):407-413. PubMed ID: 31107837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The child self-refraction study results from urban Chinese children in Guangzhou.
He M; Congdon N; MacKenzie G; Zeng Y; Silver JD; Ellwein L
Ophthalmology; 2011 Jun; 118(6):1162-9. PubMed ID: 21232802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assesment of the QuickSee wavefront autorefractor for characterizing refractive errors in school-age children.
Gil A; Hernández CS; Pérez-Merino P; Rubio M; Velarde G; Abellanas-Lodares M; Román-Daza Á; Alejandre N; Jiménez-Alfaro I; Casares I; Dave SR; Lim D; Lage E
PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0240933. PubMed ID: 33112912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of refractive error measurements by three different models of autorefractors and subjective refraction in young adults.
Wosik J; Patrzykont M; Pniewski J
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2019 Apr; 36(4):B1-B6. PubMed ID: 31044948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An alternative clinical routine for subjective refraction based on power vectors with trial frames.
María Revert A; Conversa MA; Albarrán Diego C; Micó V
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jan; 37(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 28030877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of six different autorefractor designs on the precision and accuracy of refractive error measurement.
Venkataraman AP; Brautaset R; Domínguez-Vicent A
PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0278269. PubMed ID: 36441778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Repeatability of subjective and objective refraction.
Rosenfield M; Chiu NN
Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Aug; 72(8):577-9. PubMed ID: 8539026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Population-based assessment of sensitivity and specificity of a pinhole for detection of significant refractive errors in the community.
Marmamula S; Keeffe JE; Narsaiah S; Khanna RC; Rao GN
Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Nov; 97(6):523-7. PubMed ID: 24909916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
