132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35103362)
1. Effect of transition to an automated milking system for a tie-stall barn on milk production and cow condition.
Suzuki T; Saito T; Osawa Y; Kemmei K; Uchiyama Y; Kawauchi D; Ishida M
Anim Sci J; 2022; 93(1):e13686. PubMed ID: 35103362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of milking, over-milking and vacuum levels on front and rear quarter teats in dairy cows.
Vierbauch T; Peinhopf-Petz W; Wittek T
J Dairy Res; 2021 Nov; 88(4):396-400. PubMed ID: 34924072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Udder health of cows changing from tie stalls or free stalls with conventional milking to free stalls with either conventional or automatic milking.
Hovinen M; Rasmussen MD; Pyörälä S
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Aug; 92(8):3696-703. PubMed ID: 19620651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Associations of herd- and cow-level factors, cow lying behavior, and risk of elevated somatic cell count in free-stall housed lactating dairy cows.
Watters ME; Meijer KM; Barkema HW; Leslie KE; von Keyserlingk MA; Devries TJ
Prev Vet Med; 2013 Sep; 111(3-4):245-55. PubMed ID: 23791124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A longitudinal prospective cohort study investigating the association of premilking stimulation and teat-end shape on milking characteristics and teat tissue condition in dairy cows.
Wieland M; Melvin JM; Nydam DV; Virkler PD
BMC Vet Res; 2019 Feb; 15(1):58. PubMed ID: 30755196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stocking density, milking duration, and lying times of lactating cows on Canadian freestall dairy farms.
Charlton GL; Haley DB; Rushen J; de Passillé AM
J Dairy Sci; 2014 May; 97(5):2694-700. PubMed ID: 24582443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Short-term effect of transition from conventional to automated milking on teat skin and teat end condition.
De Vliegher S; Laevens H; Barkema HW; Opsomer G; Hemling T; de Kruif A
J Dairy Sci; 2003 May; 86(5):1646-52. PubMed ID: 12778575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors associated with productivity on automatic milking system dairy farms in the Upper Midwest United States.
Siewert JM; Salfer JA; Endres MI
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8327-8334. PubMed ID: 29908798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of flow-controlled vacuum on milking performance and teat condition in a rotary milking parlor.
Reinemann DJ; van den Borne BHP; Hogeveen H; Wiedemann M; Paulrud CO
J Dairy Sci; 2021 Jun; 104(6):6820-6831. PubMed ID: 33773794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of pulsation ratio on teat condition, milk somatic cell count and productivity in dairy cows in automatic milking.
Ferneborg S; Svennersten-Sjaunja K
J Dairy Res; 2015 Nov; 82(4):453-9. PubMed ID: 26411595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of 2 different premilking stimulation regimens, with and without manual forestripping, on teat tissue condition and milking performance in Holstein dairy cows milked 3 times daily.
Wieland M; Virkler PD; Weld A; Melvin JM; Wettstein MR; Oswald MF; Geary CM; Watters RD; Lynch R; Nydam DV
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Oct; 103(10):9548-9560. PubMed ID: 32828498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Premilking teat preparation for Australian pasture-based cows milked by an automated milking system.
Davis KL; Fulkerson WJ; Garcia SC; Dickeson D; Barchia IM
J Dairy Sci; 2008 Jul; 91(7):2604-9. PubMed ID: 18565919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Technical note: Effects of attachment of hind teats before cleaning and attachment of front teats on milking characteristics in automatic milking systems.
Besier J; Schüpbach-Regula G; Wellnitz O; Bruckmaier RM
J Dairy Sci; 2017 Apr; 100(4):3091-3095. PubMed ID: 28161171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Invited review: udder health of dairy cows in automatic milking.
Hovinen M; Pyörälä S
J Dairy Sci; 2011 Feb; 94(2):547-62. PubMed ID: 21257025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Farm-level factors associated with lameness prevalence, productivity, and milk quality in farms with automated milking systems.
Matson RD; King MTM; Duffield TF; Santschi DE; Orsel K; Pajor EA; Penner GB; Mutsvangwa T; DeVries TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2022 Jan; 105(1):793-806. PubMed ID: 34635359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Milk-flow data collected routinely in an automatic milking system: an alternative to milking-time testing in the management of teat-end condition?
Nørstebø H; Rachah A; Dalen G; Rønningen O; Whist AC; Reksen O
Acta Vet Scand; 2018 Jan; 60(1):2. PubMed ID: 29325588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of milk enzymes and electrolytes, plasma metabolites, and oxidative status in twin cows milked in an automatic milking system or twice daily in a conventional milking parlor.
Abeni F; Terzano MG; Speroni M; Migliorati L; Capelletti M; Calza F; Bianchi L; Pirlo G
J Dairy Sci; 2008 Sep; 91(9):3372-84. PubMed ID: 18765596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized controlled trial to study the effects of an automated premilking stimulation system on milking performance, teat tissue condition, and udder health in Holstein dairy cows.
Wieland M; Geary CM; Nydam DV; Virkler PD; Zurakowski M; Watters RD; Lynch R
J Dairy Sci; 2023 Sep; 106(9):6551-6566. PubMed ID: 37500447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lying times of lactating cows on dairy farms with automatic milking systems and the relation to lameness, leg lesions, and body condition score.
Westin R; Vaughan A; de Passillé AM; DeVries TJ; Pajor EA; Pellerin D; Siegford JM; Vasseur E; Rushen J
J Dairy Sci; 2016 Jan; 99(1):551-61. PubMed ID: 26547637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Once-daily milking during late lactation in pasture-fed dairy cows has minor effects on feed intake, body condition score gain, and hepatic gene expression.
Grala TM; Handley RR; Roche JR; Walker CG; Phyn CVC; Kay JK
J Dairy Sci; 2016 Apr; 99(4):3041-3055. PubMed ID: 26851848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
