These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35103537)
1. A Randomized Trial Comparing Breast Cancer Incidence and Interval Cancers after Tomosynthesis Plus Mammography versus Mammography Alone. Pattacini P; Nitrosi A; Giorgi Rossi P; Duffy SW; Iotti V; Ginocchi V; Ravaioli S; Vacondio R; Mancuso P; Ragazzi M; Campari C; Radiology; 2022 May; 303(2):256-266. PubMed ID: 35103537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interval and Subsequent Round Breast Cancer in a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography Screening. Hofvind S; Moshina N; Holen ÅS; Danielsen AS; Lee CI; Houssami N; Aase HS; Akslen LA; Haldorsen IS Radiology; 2021 Jul; 300(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 33973840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: The Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial. Skaane P; Bandos AI; Niklason LT; Sebuødegård S; Østerås BH; Gullien R; Gur D; Hofvind S Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 30777808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening: The Reggio Emilia Tomosynthesis Randomized Trial. Pattacini P; Nitrosi A; Giorgi Rossi P; Iotti V; Ginocchi V; Ravaioli S; Vacondio R; Braglia L; Cavuto S; Campari C; Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):375-385. PubMed ID: 29869961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing accuracy of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography or synthetic 2D mammography in breast cancer screening: baseline results of the MAITA RCT consortium. Giorgi Rossi P; Mancuso P; Pattacini P; Campari C; Nitrosi A; Iotti V; Ponti A; Frigerio A; Correale L; Riggi E; Giordano L; Segnan N; Di Leo G; Magni V; Sardanelli F; Fornasa F; Romanucci G; Montemezzi S; Falini P; Auzzi N; Zappa M; Ottone M; Mantellini P; Duffy SW; Armaroli P; ; ; Coriani C; Pescarolo M; Stefanelli G; Tondelli G; Beretti F; Caffarri S; Marchesi V; Canovi L; Colli M; Boschini M; Bertolini M; Ragazzi M; Pattacini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Iotti V; Ginocchi V; Ravaioli S; Vacondio R; Campari C; Caroli S; Nitrosi A; Braglia L; Cavuto S; Mancuso P; Djuric O; Venturelli F; Vicentini M; Braghiroli MB; Lonetti J; Davoli E; Bonelli E; Fornasa F; Montemezzi S; Romanucci G; Lucchi I; Martello G; Rossati C; Mantellini P; Ambrogetti D; Iossa A; Carnesciali E; Mazzalupo V; Falini P; Puliti D; Zappa M; Battisti F; Auzzi N; Verdi S; Degl'Innocenti C; Tramalloni D; Cavazza E; Busoni S; Betti E; Peruzzi F; Regini F; Sardanelli F; Di Leo G; Carbonaro LA; Magni V; Cozzi A; Spinelli D; Monaco CG; Schiaffino S; Benedek A; Menicagli L; Ferraris R; Favettini E; Dettori D; Falco P; Presti P; Segnan N; Ponti A; Frigerio A; Armaroli P; Correale L; Marra V; Milanesio L; Artuso F; Di Leo A; Castellano I; Riggi E; Casella D; Pitarella S; Vergini V; Giordano L; Duffy SW; Graewingholt A; Lang K; Falcini F Eur J Cancer; 2024 Mar; 199():113553. PubMed ID: 38262307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast Density and Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A TOSYMA Trial Subanalysis. Weigel S; Heindel W; Hense HW; Decker T; Gerß J; Kerschke L; Radiology; 2023 Feb; 306(2):e221006. PubMed ID: 36194110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus Digital Mammography for Detection of Early-Stage Cancers Stratified by Grade: A TOSYMA Subanalysis. Weigel S; Heindel W; Decker T; Weyer-Elberich V; Kerschke L; Gerß J; Hense HW; Radiology; 2023 Dec; 309(3):e231533. PubMed ID: 38051184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Five Consecutive Years of Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Outcomes by Screening Year and Round. Conant EF; Zuckerman SP; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Korhonen KE; Birnbaum JA; Tobey JD; Schnall MD; Hubbard RA Radiology; 2020 May; 295(2):285-293. PubMed ID: 32154771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interval and Consecutive Round Breast Cancer after Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Standard 2D Digital Mammography in BreastScreen Norway. Hovda T; Holen ÅS; Lång K; Albertsen JL; Bjørndal H; Brandal SHB; Sahlberg KK; Skaane P; Suhrke P; Hofvind S Radiology; 2020 Feb; 294(2):256-264. PubMed ID: 31821118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Local Tumor Staging of Breast Cancer: Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis. Fontaine M; Tourasse C; Pages E; Laurent N; Laffargue G; Millet I; Molinari N; Taourel P Radiology; 2019 Jun; 291(3):594-603. PubMed ID: 30964425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomised controlled trial of digital breast tomosynthesis vs digital mammography as primary screening tests: Screening results over subsequent episodes of the Proteus Donna study. Armaroli P; Frigerio A; Correale L; Ponti A; Artuso F; Casella D; Falco P; Favettini E; Fonio P; Giordano L; Marra V; Milanesio L; Morra L; Presti P; Riggi E; Vergini V; Segnan N Int J Cancer; 2022 Nov; 151(10):1778-1790. PubMed ID: 35689673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tumor Characteristics and Molecular Subtypes in Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: The Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial. Johnson K; Zackrisson S; Rosso A; Sartor H; Saal LH; Andersson I; Lång K Radiology; 2019 Nov; 293(2):273-281. PubMed ID: 31478799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interval Breast Cancer Rates and Tumor Characteristics in the Prospective Population-based Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial. Johnson K; Lång K; Ikeda DM; Åkesson A; Andersson I; Zackrisson S Radiology; 2021 Jun; 299(3):559-567. PubMed ID: 33825509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing Screening Outcomes for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography by Automated Breast Density in a Randomized Controlled Trial: Results from the To-Be Trial. Moshina N; Aase HS; Danielsen AS; Haldorsen IS; Lee CI; Zackrisson S; Hofvind S Radiology; 2020 Dec; 297(3):522-531. PubMed ID: 32930649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interval cancer in the Córdoba Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (CBTST): comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis plus digital mammography to digital mammography alone. Pulido-Carmona C; Romero-Martín S; Raya-Povedano JL; Cara-García M; Font-Ugalde P; Elías-Cabot E; Pedrosa-Garriguet M; Álvarez-Benito M Eur Radiol; 2024 Aug; 34(8):5427-5438. PubMed ID: 38177619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multicenter Evaluation of Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Combination with Synthetic versus Digital Mammography. Zuckerman SP; Sprague BL; Weaver DL; Herschorn SD; Conant EF Radiology; 2020 Dec; 297(3):545-553. PubMed ID: 33048032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital Mammography versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Impact of Breast Density on Diagnostic Performance in Population-based Screening. Østerås BH; Martinsen ACT; Gullien R; Skaane P Radiology; 2019 Oct; 293(1):60-68. PubMed ID: 31407968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The TOMMY trial: a comparison of TOMosynthesis with digital MammographY in the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme--a multicentre retrospective reading study comparing the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography with digital mammography alone. Gilbert FJ; Tucker L; Gillan MG; Willsher P; Cooke J; Duncan KA; Michell MJ; Dobson HM; Lim YY; Purushothaman H; Strudley C; Astley SM; Morrish O; Young KC; Duffy SW Health Technol Assess; 2015 Jan; 19(4):i-xxv, 1-136. PubMed ID: 25599513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening outcome for consecutive examinations with digital breast tomosynthesis versus standard digital mammography in a population-based screening program. Hovda T; Brandal SHB; Sebuødegård S; Holen ÅS; Bjørndal H; Skaane P; Hofvind S Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):6991-6999. PubMed ID: 31187221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]