157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35103537)
1. A Randomized Trial Comparing Breast Cancer Incidence and Interval Cancers after Tomosynthesis Plus Mammography versus Mammography Alone.
Pattacini P; Nitrosi A; Giorgi Rossi P; Duffy SW; Iotti V; Ginocchi V; Ravaioli S; Vacondio R; Mancuso P; Ragazzi M; Campari C;
Radiology; 2022 May; 303(2):256-266. PubMed ID: 35103537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interval and Subsequent Round Breast Cancer in a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography Screening.
Hofvind S; Moshina N; Holen ÅS; Danielsen AS; Lee CI; Houssami N; Aase HS; Akslen LA; Haldorsen IS
Radiology; 2021 Jul; 300(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 33973840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: The Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
Skaane P; Bandos AI; Niklason LT; Sebuødegård S; Østerås BH; Gullien R; Gur D; Hofvind S
Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 30777808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening: The Reggio Emilia Tomosynthesis Randomized Trial.
Pattacini P; Nitrosi A; Giorgi Rossi P; Iotti V; Ginocchi V; Ravaioli S; Vacondio R; Braglia L; Cavuto S; Campari C;
Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):375-385. PubMed ID: 29869961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing accuracy of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography or synthetic 2D mammography in breast cancer screening: baseline results of the MAITA RCT consortium.
Giorgi Rossi P; Mancuso P; Pattacini P; Campari C; Nitrosi A; Iotti V; Ponti A; Frigerio A; Correale L; Riggi E; Giordano L; Segnan N; Di Leo G; Magni V; Sardanelli F; Fornasa F; Romanucci G; Montemezzi S; Falini P; Auzzi N; Zappa M; Ottone M; Mantellini P; Duffy SW; Armaroli P; ; ; Coriani C; Pescarolo M; Stefanelli G; Tondelli G; Beretti F; Caffarri S; Marchesi V; Canovi L; Colli M; Boschini M; Bertolini M; Ragazzi M; Pattacini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Iotti V; Ginocchi V; Ravaioli S; Vacondio R; Campari C; Caroli S; Nitrosi A; Braglia L; Cavuto S; Mancuso P; Djuric O; Venturelli F; Vicentini M; Braghiroli MB; Lonetti J; Davoli E; Bonelli E; Fornasa F; Montemezzi S; Romanucci G; Lucchi I; Martello G; Rossati C; Mantellini P; Ambrogetti D; Iossa A; Carnesciali E; Mazzalupo V; Falini P; Puliti D; Zappa M; Battisti F; Auzzi N; Verdi S; Degl'Innocenti C; Tramalloni D; Cavazza E; Busoni S; Betti E; Peruzzi F; Regini F; Sardanelli F; Di Leo G; Carbonaro LA; Magni V; Cozzi A; Spinelli D; Monaco CG; Schiaffino S; Benedek A; Menicagli L; Ferraris R; Favettini E; Dettori D; Falco P; Presti P; Segnan N; Ponti A; Frigerio A; Armaroli P; Correale L; Marra V; Milanesio L; Artuso F; Di Leo A; Castellano I; Riggi E; Casella D; Pitarella S; Vergini V; Giordano L; Duffy SW; Graewingholt A; Lang K; Falcini F
Eur J Cancer; 2024 Mar; 199():113553. PubMed ID: 38262307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast Density and Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A TOSYMA Trial Subanalysis.
Weigel S; Heindel W; Hense HW; Decker T; Gerß J; Kerschke L;
Radiology; 2023 Feb; 306(2):e221006. PubMed ID: 36194110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus Digital Mammography for Detection of Early-Stage Cancers Stratified by Grade: A TOSYMA Subanalysis.
Weigel S; Heindel W; Decker T; Weyer-Elberich V; Kerschke L; Gerß J; Hense HW;
Radiology; 2023 Dec; 309(3):e231533. PubMed ID: 38051184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Five Consecutive Years of Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Outcomes by Screening Year and Round.
Conant EF; Zuckerman SP; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Korhonen KE; Birnbaum JA; Tobey JD; Schnall MD; Hubbard RA
Radiology; 2020 May; 295(2):285-293. PubMed ID: 32154771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interval and Consecutive Round Breast Cancer after Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Standard 2D Digital Mammography in BreastScreen Norway.
Hovda T; Holen ÅS; Lång K; Albertsen JL; Bjørndal H; Brandal SHB; Sahlberg KK; Skaane P; Suhrke P; Hofvind S
Radiology; 2020 Feb; 294(2):256-264. PubMed ID: 31821118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Local Tumor Staging of Breast Cancer: Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis.
Fontaine M; Tourasse C; Pages E; Laurent N; Laffargue G; Millet I; Molinari N; Taourel P
Radiology; 2019 Jun; 291(3):594-603. PubMed ID: 30964425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interval Breast Cancer Rates and Tumor Characteristics in the Prospective Population-based Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
Johnson K; Lång K; Ikeda DM; Åkesson A; Andersson I; Zackrisson S
Radiology; 2021 Jun; 299(3):559-567. PubMed ID: 33825509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing Screening Outcomes for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography by Automated Breast Density in a Randomized Controlled Trial: Results from the To-Be Trial.
Moshina N; Aase HS; Danielsen AS; Haldorsen IS; Lee CI; Zackrisson S; Hofvind S
Radiology; 2020 Dec; 297(3):522-531. PubMed ID: 32930649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tumor Characteristics and Molecular Subtypes in Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: The Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
Johnson K; Zackrisson S; Rosso A; Sartor H; Saal LH; Andersson I; Lång K
Radiology; 2019 Nov; 293(2):273-281. PubMed ID: 31478799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomised controlled trial of digital breast tomosynthesis vs digital mammography as primary screening tests: Screening results over subsequent episodes of the Proteus Donna study.
Armaroli P; Frigerio A; Correale L; Ponti A; Artuso F; Casella D; Falco P; Favettini E; Fonio P; Giordano L; Marra V; Milanesio L; Morra L; Presti P; Riggi E; Vergini V; Segnan N
Int J Cancer; 2022 Nov; 151(10):1778-1790. PubMed ID: 35689673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital Mammography versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Impact of Breast Density on Diagnostic Performance in Population-based Screening.
Østerås BH; Martinsen ACT; Gullien R; Skaane P
Radiology; 2019 Oct; 293(1):60-68. PubMed ID: 31407968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multicenter Evaluation of Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Combination with Synthetic versus Digital Mammography.
Zuckerman SP; Sprague BL; Weaver DL; Herschorn SD; Conant EF
Radiology; 2020 Dec; 297(3):545-553. PubMed ID: 33048032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital 2D versus Tomosynthesis Screening Mammography among Women Aged 65 and Older in the United States.
Bahl M; Pinnamaneni N; Mercaldo S; McCarthy AM; Lehman CD
Radiology; 2019 Jun; 291(3):582-590. PubMed ID: 30938625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Addition of Screening Breast US to Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Average Risk.
Yi A; Jang MJ; Yim D; Kwon BR; Shin SU; Chang JM
Radiology; 2021 Mar; 298(3):568-575. PubMed ID: 33434108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening outcome for consecutive examinations with digital breast tomosynthesis versus standard digital mammography in a population-based screening program.
Hovda T; Brandal SHB; Sebuødegård S; Holen ÅS; Bjørndal H; Skaane P; Hofvind S
Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):6991-6999. PubMed ID: 31187221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
