BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35103644)

  • 41. Best-BRA (Is subpectoral or prepectoral implant placement best in immediate breast reconstruction?): a protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of subpectoral versus prepectoral immediate implant-based breast reconstruction in women following mastectomy.
    Roberts K; Mills N; Metcalfe C; Lane A; Clement C; Hollingworth W; Taylor J; Holcombe C; Skillman J; Fairhurst K; Whisker L; Cutress R; Thrush S; Fairbrother P; Potter S
    BMJ Open; 2021 Nov; 11(11):e050886. PubMed ID: 34848516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Should Obesity Be Considered a Contraindication for Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction?
    Banuelos J; Abu-Ghname A; Vyas K; Sharaf B; Nguyen MT; Harless C; Manrique OJ; Martinez-Jorge J; Tran NV
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Mar; 145(3):619-627. PubMed ID: 32097293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A Critical Appraisal of Late Complications of Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
    King CA; Bartholomew AJ; Sosin M; Avila A; Famiglietti AL; Dekker PK; Perez-Alvarez IM; Song DH; Fan KL; Tousimis EA
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Dec; 28(13):9150-9158. PubMed ID: 34386913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Impact of Tissue Expander Surface Texture on Two-Stage Breast Reconstruction Outcomes: A Combined Analysis.
    Park BC; Alving-Trinh AL; Prigmore HL; Harrell FE; Sarhane K; Joseph JT; Thomas H; Lupi AL; Perdikis G; Higdon KK
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Jun; 153(6):1053e-1062e. PubMed ID: 37252917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Impact of Obesity on Outcomes of Prepectoral vs Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.
    Asaad M; Hassan AM; Morris N; Kumar S; Liu J; Butler CE; Selber JC
    Aesthet Surg J; 2023 Sep; 43(10):NP774-NP786. PubMed ID: 37265099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of Reconstructive Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients With Preexisting Subpectoral Implants: Implant-Sparing Mastectomy With Delayed Implant Exchange Versus Immediate Tissue Expander Reconstruction.
    Parabkaharan S; Melody M; Trotta R; Lleshi A; Sun W; Smith PD; Khakpour N; Dayicioglu D
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Jun; 76 Suppl 4():S332-5. PubMed ID: 27187252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. When to Consider Prepectoral Implant Conversion After Subpectoral Implant Breast Reconstruction and How to Plan It.
    Salgarello M; Barone Adesi L; Macrì G; Visconti G
    Aesthet Surg J; 2023 Nov; 43(12):NP1071-NP1077. PubMed ID: 37668406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Smooth vs Textured Expanders: Patient Factors and Anatomic Plane Are Greater Factors in Determining First-Stage Breast Reconstruction Outcomes.
    Dahmus ES; Ruffino AE; Madera JD; Long A; Wang S; Kauffman CA; Devitt S; Sanders C; DeSantis J
    Aesthet Surg J; 2024 Jan; 44(2):NP159-NP167. PubMed ID: 37706322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Complication Profile of Total Submuscular Versus Prepectoral Tissue Expander Placement: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Soni SE; Le NK; Buller M; Modica AD; Kumar A; Smith PD; Laronga C
    Ann Plast Surg; 2022 Jun; 88(5 Suppl 5):S439-S442. PubMed ID: 35502960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct to Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
    Mirhaidari SJ; Azouz V; Wagner DS
    Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Mar; 84(3):263-270. PubMed ID: 31663934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Prepectoral breast reconstruction is safe in the setting of post-mastectomy radiation therapy.
    Long C; Kraenzlin F; Aravind P; Kokosis G; Yesantharao P; Sacks JM; Rosson GD
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Sep; 75(9):3041-3047. PubMed ID: 35599219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A Comparative Analysis between Subpectoral versus Prepectoral Single Stage Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction.
    Kim JH; Hong SE
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2020 Oct; 56(10):. PubMed ID: 33066236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Early Complications in Prepectoral Breast Reconstructions with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Preliminary Analysis of Outcomes.
    Plotsker EL; Graziano FD; Rubenstein RN; Haglich K; Allen RJ; Coriddi MR; Dayan JH; Poulton R; McKernan C; Mehrara BJ; Matros E; Disa JJ; Nelson JA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Apr; 153(4):786-793. PubMed ID: 37220401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Revision Breast Reconstruction with Prepectoral Pocket Conversion of Submuscular Breast Implants.
    Kraenzlin F; Chopra K; Kokosis G; Venturi ML; Mesbahi A; Nahabedian MY
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 May; 147(5):743e-748e. PubMed ID: 33890886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy or nipple-sparing mastectomy (OPBC-02/ PREPEC): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised, superiority trial.
    Kappos EA; Schulz A; Regan MM; Moffa G; Harder Y; Ribi K; Potter S; Pusic AL; Fehr MK; Hemkens LG; Holzbach T; Farhadi J; Simonson C; Knauer M; Verstappen R; Bucher HC; Zwahlen D; Zimmermann F; Schwenkglenks M; Mucklow R; Shaw J; Bjelic-Radisic V; Chiorescu A; Chun YS; Farah S; Xiaosong C; Nigard L; Kuemmel S; Reitsamer R; Hauschild M; Fulco I; Tausch C; Fischer T; Sarlos D; Constantinescu MA; Lupatsch JE; Fitzal F; Heil J; Matrai Z; de Boniface J; Kurzeder C; Haug M; Weber WP
    BMJ Open; 2021 Sep; 11(9):e045239. PubMed ID: 34475143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Prepectoral Immediate Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction with Anterior AlloDerm Coverage.
    Jones G; Yoo A; King V; Jao B; Wang H; Rammos C; Elwood E
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Dec; 140(6S Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction):31S-38S. PubMed ID: 29166345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Two-Stage Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison Between Prepectoral and Partial Subpectoral Techniques.
    Nahabedian MY; Cocilovo C
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Dec; 140(6S Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction):22S-30S. PubMed ID: 29166344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A prospective comparison study of early functional outcomes after implant-based breast reconstruction: subpectoral versus prepectoral technique.
    Lee JS; Park E; Lee JH; Lee J; Park HY; Yang JD; Jung TD
    Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Mar; 10(3):2520-2529. PubMed ID: 33691448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol Allows Safe Same-Day Discharge in Expander Based and Oncoplastic Breast Reconstruction.
    Niu EF; Frageau JC; Rogoff H; Cannata B; Wang KE; Marquez J; Munn B; Shah S; Bakoulis A; Farrelly P; O'Hea B; Huston TL
    Ann Plast Surg; 2023 Jun; 90(6S Suppl 5):S538-S542. PubMed ID: 36880790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.
    Reitsamer R; Peintinger F
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Feb; 68(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 25455288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.