These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35105192)

  • 41. Academic fraud: perspectives from a lifelong anesthesia researcher.
    Mutch WA
    Can J Anaesth; 2011 Sep; 58(9):782-4, 784-8. PubMed ID: 21643872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Integrity measures take its toll: Introducing a complete supplement issue with retractions only.
    Behl C
    J Cell Biochem; 2021 Nov; 122 Suppl 1():S7. PubMed ID: 34715723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium.
    Kretser A; Murphy D; Bertuzzi S; Abraham T; Allison DB; Boor KJ; Dwyer J; Grantham A; Harris LJ; Hollander R; Jacobs-Young C; Rovito S; Vafiadis D; Woteki C; Wyndham J; Yada R
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Apr; 25(2):327-355. PubMed ID: 30810892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Research ethics and scientific misconduct in biomedical research.
    Kansu E; Ruacan S
    Acta Neurochir Suppl; 2002; 83():11-5. PubMed ID: 12442615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Scientific integrity in Brazil.
    Lins L; Carvalho FM
    J Bioeth Inq; 2014 Sep; 11(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 24952507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. All above board: openness is the only option if science is to maintain its integrity.
    New Sci; 2004 Mar 6-12; 181(2437):3. PubMed ID: 15139348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The role of scientific associations in promoting research integrity and deterring research misconduct. Commentary on 'Challenges in studying the effects of scientific societies on research integrity' (Levine and Iutcovitch).
    Anderson MS; Shultz JB
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2003 Apr; 9(2):269-72. PubMed ID: 12774658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A retrospective analysis of 10-year authorship trends in biomedical engineering journals.
    Foo JY
    Account Res; 2011 Mar; 18(2):91-101. PubMed ID: 21390873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Don't shoot the messenger.
    New Sci; 2006 Jun 17-23; 190(2556):5. PubMed ID: 16862721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The ethics of scientific publishing.
    Schulze R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Jul; 41(5):355. PubMed ID: 22707329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Fraud and other misconduct in biomedical research.
    Illingworth R
    Neurocirugia (Astur); 2005 Aug; 16(4):297-300. PubMed ID: 16143804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A primer on the responsibilities and abuses of scientific authorship.
    Hays JC
    Public Health Nurs; 2010; 27(6):471-3. PubMed ID: 21087299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A.S.P.E.N. policy on academic misconduct.
    American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2013 Apr; 28(2):260-2. PubMed ID: 23462417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Biomedical industrial sponsorship and its impact on the medical literature.
    Morris PJ
    World J Surg; 2006 Aug; 30(8):1371-3. PubMed ID: 16773249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Factors associated with research wrongdoing in Nigeria.
    Adeleye OA; Adebamowo CA
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2012 Dec; 7(5):15-24. PubMed ID: 23324199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. What Crisis? Management Researchers' Experiences with and Views of Scholarly Misconduct.
    Hopp C; Hoover GA
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Oct; 25(5):1549-1588. PubMed ID: 30604353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The dark side of scientific research.
    McDonald JC
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 118(3):231-2. PubMed ID: 16772306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Misconduct policies in high-impact biomedical journals.
    Bosch X; Hernández C; Pericas JM; Doti P; Marušić A
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e51928. PubMed ID: 23284820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Mad scientist: the unique case of a published delusion.
    Shelomi M
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2013 Jun; 19(2):381-8. PubMed ID: 22173734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Perceptions of Chinese Biomedical Researchers Towards Academic Misconduct: A Comparison Between 2015 and 2010.
    Liao QJ; Zhang YY; Fan YC; Zheng MH; Bai Y; Eslick GD; He XX; Zhang SB; Xia HH; He H
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Apr; 24(2):629-645. PubMed ID: 28397174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.