185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35105349)
1. Cut-out risk factor analysis after intramedullary nailing for the treatment of extracapsular fractures of the proximal femur: a retrospective study.
Yoon JY; Park S; Kim T; Im GI
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Feb; 23(1):107. PubMed ID: 35105349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictors of failure following fixation of intertrochanteric fractures with proximal femoral nail antirotation.
Raghuraman R; Kam JW; Chua DTC
Singapore Med J; 2019 Sep; 60(9):463-467. PubMed ID: 31570952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk factors for mechanical failure of intertrochanteric fractures after fixation with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA II): a study in a Southeast Asian population.
Zhang W; Antony Xavier RP; Decruz J; Chen YD; Park DH
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2021 Apr; 141(4):569-575. PubMed ID: 32296964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implant cut-out following cephalomedullary nailing of intertrochanteric femur fractures: Are helical blades to blame?
Ibrahim I; Appleton PT; Wixted JJ; DeAngelis JP; Rodriguez EK
Injury; 2019 Apr; 50(4):926-930. PubMed ID: 30885393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intramedullary nailing confers an increased risk of medial migration compared to dynamic hip screw fixation in unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures.
Law GW; Wong YR; Gardner A; Ng YH
Injury; 2021 Nov; 52(11):3440-3445. PubMed ID: 33551262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Jul; (3):CD000093. PubMed ID: 18646058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison of 2-Screw Implant and Antirotational Blade Implant in Treatment of Trochanteric Fractures].
FeldinszkÁ J; Jacko P; Barinka J; Kilian M; Šimko P
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2020; 87(4):268-272. PubMed ID: 32940222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (4):CD000093. PubMed ID: 12519535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk factors for cut-outs in geriatric intertrochanteric fractures with cephalomedullary nailing after obtaining acceptable reduction: a case-control study.
Huang JW; Gao XS; Yang YF
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Apr; 23(1):354. PubMed ID: 35414068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2005 Oct; (4):CD000093. PubMed ID: 16235272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (1):CD000093. PubMed ID: 14973946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Sep; (9):CD000093. PubMed ID: 20824825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (1):CD000093. PubMed ID: 11869563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical Comparison of Three Different Intramedullary Nails for Fixation of Unstable Basicervical Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Proximal Femur: Experimental Studies.
Kwak DK; Kim WH; Lee SJ; Rhyu SH; Jang CY; Yoo JH
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():7618079. PubMed ID: 30643821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictors of cut-out after cephalomedullary nail fixation of pertrochanteric fractures: a retrospective study of 813 patients.
Murena L; Moretti A; Meo F; Saggioro E; Barbati G; Ratti C; Canton G
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2018 Mar; 138(3):351-359. PubMed ID: 29273922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk factors for cut-out of double lag screw fixation in proximal femoral fractures.
Buyukdogan K; Caglar O; Isik S; Tokgozoglu M; Atilla B
Injury; 2017 Feb; 48(2):414-418. PubMed ID: 27889112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cephalomedullary helical blade is independently associated with less collapse in intertrochanteric femur fractures than lag screws.
Goodnough LH; Wadhwa H; Tigchelaar SS; Pfaff K; Heffner M; Van Rysselberghe N; DeBaun MR; Bishop JA; Gardner MJ
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2021 Oct; 31(7):1421-1425. PubMed ID: 33587180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gamma 3 U-Blade lag screws in patients with trochanteric femur fractures: are rotation control lag screws better than others?
Yoo J; Kim S; Choi J; Hwang J
J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Dec; 14(1):440. PubMed ID: 31842911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical and radiological outcomes of patients treated with the talon distalfix proximal femoral nail for intertrochanteric femur fractures.
Yapici F; Ucpunar H; Camurcu Y; Emirhan N; Tanoglu O; Tardus I
Injury; 2020 Apr; 51(4):1045-1050. PubMed ID: 32151425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures with the intramedullary hip nail.
Park SY; Yang KH; Yoo JH; Yoon HK; Park HW
J Trauma; 2008 Oct; 65(4):852-7. PubMed ID: 18849802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
