These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35105801)

  • 1. High-value decisions are fast and accurate, inconsistent with diminishing value sensitivity.
    Shevlin BRK; Smith SM; Hausfeld J; Krajbich I
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Feb; 119(6):. PubMed ID: 35105801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Normative decision rules in changing environments.
    Barendregt NW; Gold JI; Josić K; Kilpatrick ZP
    Elife; 2022 Oct; 11():. PubMed ID: 36282065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Motor response vigour and visual fixation patterns reflect subjective valuation during intertemporal choice.
    Smith E; Peters J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Jun; 18(6):e1010096. PubMed ID: 35687550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.
    Stacey D; Légaré F; Col NF; Bennett CL; Barry MJ; Eden KB; Holmes-Rovner M; Llewellyn-Thomas H; Lyddiatt A; Thomson R; Trevena L; Wu JH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Jan; (1):CD001431. PubMed ID: 24470076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A reinforcement learning diffusion decision model for value-based decisions.
    Fontanesi L; Gluth S; Spektor MS; Rieskamp J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1099-1121. PubMed ID: 30924057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in reinforcement learning.
    Pedersen ML; Frank MJ; Biele G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1234-1251. PubMed ID: 27966103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.
    Stacey D; Bennett CL; Barry MJ; Col NF; Eden KB; Holmes-Rovner M; Llewellyn-Thomas H; Lyddiatt A; Légaré F; Thomson R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Oct; (10):CD001431. PubMed ID: 21975733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From single decisions to sequential choice patterns: Extending the dynamics of value-based decision-making.
    Scherbaum S; Lade SJ; Siegmund S; Goschke T; Dshemuchadse M
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0267249. PubMed ID: 35446901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rapidly diminishing sensitivity and discrete sensitivity: Explaining people's sensitivity to outcomes across decisions.
    Evangelidis I
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Sep; 151(9):2115-2127. PubMed ID: 35084920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Uncovering the computational mechanisms underlying many-alternative choice.
    Thomas AW; Molter F; Krajbich I
    Elife; 2021 Apr; 10():. PubMed ID: 33821787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Value-based attention but not divisive normalization influences decisions with multiple alternatives.
    Gluth S; Kern N; Kortmann M; Vitali CL
    Nat Hum Behav; 2020 Jun; 4(6):634-645. PubMed ID: 32015490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Understanding the Hows and Whys of Decision-Making: From Expected Utility to Divisive Normalization.
    Glimcher P
    Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol; 2014; 79():169-76. PubMed ID: 25637264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing perceptual and preferential decision making.
    Dutilh G; Rieskamp J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Jun; 23(3):723-37. PubMed ID: 26432714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence for the speed-value trade-off: human and monkey decision making is magnitude sensitive.
    Pirrone A; Azab H; Hayden BY; Stafford T; Marshall JAR
    Decision (Wash D C ); 2018 Apr; 5(2):129-142. PubMed ID: 29682592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accounting for Taste: A Multi-Attribute Neurocomputational Model Explains the Neural Dynamics of Choices for Self and Others.
    Harris A; Clithero JA; Hutcherson CA
    J Neurosci; 2018 Sep; 38(37):7952-7968. PubMed ID: 30076214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learning to Choose: Behavioral Dynamics Underlying the Initial Acquisition of Decision Making.
    White SR; Preston MW; Swanson K; Laubach M
    bioRxiv; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38464283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Value construction through sequential sampling explains serial dependencies in decision making.
    Zylberberg A; Bakkour A; Shohamy D; Shadlen MN
    bioRxiv; 2024 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 39416151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in inter-temporal and risky choice: A case study in medial orbitofrontal cortex lesion patients and controls.
    Peters J; D'Esposito M
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Apr; 16(4):e1007615. PubMed ID: 32310962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in value-based decisions.
    Krajbich I; Rangel A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Aug; 108(33):13852-7. PubMed ID: 21808009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Learning to Choose: Behavioral Dynamics Underlying the Initial Acquisition of Decision-Making.
    White SR; Preston MW; Swanson K; Laubach M
    eNeuro; 2024 May; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 38724267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.