These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35107244)

  • 1. Ritodrine versus salbutamol for external cephalic version.
    Levin G; Cahan T; Weill Y; Axelrod M; Pollack RN; Meyer R
    Minerva Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 74(4):337-342. PubMed ID: 35107244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nifedipine versus ritodrine during external cephalic version procedure: a case control study.
    Levin G; Ezra Y; Weill Y; Kabiri D; Pollack RN; Rottenstreich A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Sep; 34(18):3008-3013. PubMed ID: 31608725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. External cephalic version with salbutamol - success rate and predictors of success.
    Tasnim N; Mahmud G; Khurshid M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2009 Feb; 19(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 19208311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tocolysis in term breech external cephalic version.
    Nor Azlin MI; Haliza H; Mahdy ZA; Anson I; Fahya MN; Jamil MA
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 Jan; 88(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 15617697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Employing nifedipine as a tocolytic agent prior to external cephalic version.
    Salim R; Zafran N; Nachum Z; Edelstein S; Shalev E
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(4):434-7. PubMed ID: 18382870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does the use of a tocolytic agent affect the success rate of external cephalic version?
    Marquette GP; Boucher M; Thériault D; Rinfret D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Oct; 175(4 Pt 1):859-61. PubMed ID: 8885736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relationship between amniotic fluid index and successful external cephalic version: a 14-year experience.
    Boucher M; Bujold E; Marquette GP; Vezina Y
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Sep; 189(3):751-4. PubMed ID: 14526307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictors for a successful external cephalic version: a single centre experience.
    Ebner F; Friedl TW; Leinert E; Schramm A; Reister F; Lato K; Janni W; DeGregorio N
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Apr; 293(4):749-55. PubMed ID: 26437955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of bladder volume in the success of external cephalic version.
    Levin G; Rottenstreich A; Weill Y; Pollack RN
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Nov; 230():178-181. PubMed ID: 30308400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maternal and perinatal outcomes in external cephalic version: prognostic factors for the success of the technique.
    Trobo D; Pintado P; Ortega V; Yllana F; Hernández C; Mendizábal R; De León-Luis J
    J Perinat Med; 2019 Sep; 47(7):717-723. PubMed ID: 31369397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Atosiban versus ritodrine as tocolytics in external cephalic version.
    Couceiro Naveira E; López Ramón Y Cajal C
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Jan; 35(1):80-85. PubMed ID: 31931641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intravenous salbutamol for external cephalic version.
    Vani S; Lau SY; Lim BK; Omar SZ; Tan PC
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Jan; 104(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 18922525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictive factors for successful external cephalic version with regional anesthesia.
    Unno S; Ogawa K; Nukariya A; Umehara N; Sago H
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 May; 49(5):1335-1340. PubMed ID: 36796109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. External cephalic version for breech presentation before term.
    Hutton EK; Hofmeyr GJ; Dowswell T
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Jul; 2015(7):CD000084. PubMed ID: 26222245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predictive Factors for Successful Vaginal Delivery after a Trial of External Cephalic Version: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 946 Women.
    Bilgory A; Minich O; Shvaikovsky M; Gurevich G; Lessing JB; Olteanu I
    Am J Perinatol; 2023 Nov; 40(15):1679-1686. PubMed ID: 34775580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A prospective randomised controlled trial of external cephalic version comparing two methods of uterine tocolysis with a non-tocolysis group.
    Tan GW; Jen SW; Tan SL; Salmon YM
    Singapore Med J; 1989 Apr; 30(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 2692178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of external cephalic version on the rate of vaginal and cesarean breech deliveries: a 3-year cumulative experience.
    Ben-Arie A; Kogan S; Schachter M; Hagay ZJ; Insler V
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1995 Dec; 63(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 8903766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective study of the factors associated with the success rate of external cephalic version for breech presentation at term.
    Burgos J; Melchor JC; Pijoán JI; Cobos P; Fernández-Llebrez L; Martínez-Astorquiza T
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2011 Jan; 112(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 20870233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tocolysis for repeat external cephalic version in breech presentation at term: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.
    Impey L; Pandit M
    BJOG; 2005 May; 112(5):627-31. PubMed ID: 15842288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mode of childbirth and neonatal outcome after external cephalic version: A prospective cohort study.
    Rosman AN; Vlemmix F; Ensing S; Opmeer BC; Te Hoven S; Velzel J; de Hundt M; van den Berg S; Rota H; van der Post JA; Mol BW; Kok M
    Midwifery; 2016 Aug; 39():44-8. PubMed ID: 27321719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.