215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35107312)
1. Management of Architectural Distortion on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis With Nonmalignant Pathology at Biopsy.
Villa-Camacho JC; Bahl M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Jul; 219(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 35107312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Tomosynthesis-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy of Architectural Distortion Without a Sonographic Correlate: A Retrospective Review.
Ambinder EB; Plotkin A; Euhus D; Mullen LA; Oluyemi E; Di Carlo P; Philip M; Panigrahi B; Cimino-Mathews A; Myers KS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Oct; 217(4):845-854. PubMed ID: 33147055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ductal carcinoma in situ on digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis: rates and predictors of pathologic upgrade.
Kim G; Mikhael PG; Oseni TO; Bahl M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6089-6098. PubMed ID: 32591884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Imaging Follow-up Versus Surgical Excision for Radial Scars Identified on Tomosynthesis-Guided Core Needle Biopsy.
Martaindale S; Omofoye TS; Teichgraeber DC; Hess KR; Whitman GJ
Acad Radiol; 2020 Mar; 27(3):389-394. PubMed ID: 31311772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rate of radial scars by core biopsy and upgrading to malignancy or high-risk lesions before and after introduction of digital breast tomosynthesis.
Phantana-Angkool A; Forster MR; Warren YE; Livasy CA; Sobel AH; Beasley LM; Trufan SJ; Hadzikadic-Gusic L; Sarantou T; Voci AE; Sarma D; White RL
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jan; 173(1):23-29. PubMed ID: 30242581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pathologic Outcomes of Architectural Distortion on Digital 2D Versus Tomosynthesis Mammography.
Bahl M; Lamb LR; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):1162-1167. PubMed ID: 28834441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of mammographically occult architectural distortion on digital breast tomosynthesis screening: initial clinical experience.
Partyka L; Lourenco AP; Mainiero MB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jul; 203(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 24951218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radial Scars on Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Upstaging Rates and Management Strategies.
Crowley C; Bahl M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2024 Jun; ():1-8. PubMed ID: 38477526
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Pathology results of architectural distortion on detected with digital breast tomosynthesis without definite sonographic correlate.
Walcott-Sapp S; Garreau J; Johnson N; Thomas KA
Am J Surg; 2019 May; 217(5):857-861. PubMed ID: 30777292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Upgrade risk of image-targeted radial scar and complex sclerosing lesions diagnosed at needle-guided biopsy: a retrospective study.
Darras C; Uchida M
Eur Radiol; 2023 Dec; 33(12):8399-8406. PubMed ID: 37386299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Benign breast papillomas without atypia diagnosed with core needle biopsy: Outcome of surgical excision and imaging follow-up.
Polat DS; Knippa EE; Ganti R; Seiler SJ; Goudreau SH
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Oct; 131():109237. PubMed ID: 32905954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital Mammography Stereotactic Biopsy versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-guided Biopsy: Differences in Biopsy Targets, Pathologic Results, and Discordance Rates.
Rochat CJ; Baird GL; Lourenco AP
Radiology; 2020 Mar; 294(3):518-527. PubMed ID: 31961261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Architectural Distortion on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Management Algorithm and Pathological Outcome.
Samreen N; Moy L; Lee CS
J Breast Imaging; 2020 Sep; 2(5):424-435. PubMed ID: 38424901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pathologic Upgrade Rates of High-Risk Breast Lesions on Digital Two-Dimensional vs Tomosynthesis Mammography.
Lamb LR; Bahl M; Hughes KS; Lehman CD
J Am Coll Surg; 2018 May; 226(5):858-867. PubMed ID: 29410346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radial scars diagnosed on breast core biopsy: Frequency of atypia and carcinoma on excision and implications for management.
Donaldson AR; Sieck L; Booth CN; Calhoun BC
Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():201-207. PubMed ID: 27371970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Malignancy Upgrade Rates of Radial Sclerosing Lesions at Breast Cancer Screening.
Yan P; DeMello L; Baird GL; Lourenco AP
Radiol Imaging Cancer; 2021 Nov; 3(6):e210036. PubMed ID: 34766844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. DETECTION OF BREAST CANCERS REPRESENTED AS ARCHITECTURAL DISTORTION: A COMPARISON OF FULL-FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY AND DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS.
Babkina TM; Gurando AV; Kozarenko TM; Gurando VR; Telniy VV; Pominchuk DV
Wiad Lek; 2021; 74(7):1674-1679. PubMed ID: 34459770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pathologic Outcomes in Single Versus Multiple Areas of Architectural Distortion on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Wang LC; Philip M; Bhole S; Rao S; Gupta D; Schacht D; Friedewald SM; Anders R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Jan; 220(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 35895298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Architectural distortion in the era of digital breast tomosynthesis: outcomes and implications for management.
Pujara AC; Hui J; Wang LC
Clin Imaging; 2019; 54():133-137. PubMed ID: 30639524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High-Risk Lesions Detected by MRI-Guided Core Biopsy: Upgrade Rates at Surgical Excision and Implications for Management.
Michaels AY; Ginter PS; Dodelzon K; Naunheim MR; Abbey GN
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Mar; 216(3):622-632. PubMed ID: 33439046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
