These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35107312)
1. Management of Architectural Distortion on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis With Nonmalignant Pathology at Biopsy. Villa-Camacho JC; Bahl M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Jul; 219(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 35107312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Tomosynthesis-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy of Architectural Distortion Without a Sonographic Correlate: A Retrospective Review. Ambinder EB; Plotkin A; Euhus D; Mullen LA; Oluyemi E; Di Carlo P; Philip M; Panigrahi B; Cimino-Mathews A; Myers KS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Oct; 217(4):845-854. PubMed ID: 33147055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Radial Scars on Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Upstaging Rates and Management Strategies. Crowley C; Bahl M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2024 Jun; 222(6):e2430845. PubMed ID: 38477526 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Ductal carcinoma in situ on digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis: rates and predictors of pathologic upgrade. Kim G; Mikhael PG; Oseni TO; Bahl M Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6089-6098. PubMed ID: 32591884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rate of radial scars by core biopsy and upgrading to malignancy or high-risk lesions before and after introduction of digital breast tomosynthesis. Phantana-Angkool A; Forster MR; Warren YE; Livasy CA; Sobel AH; Beasley LM; Trufan SJ; Hadzikadic-Gusic L; Sarantou T; Voci AE; Sarma D; White RL Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jan; 173(1):23-29. PubMed ID: 30242581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pathologic Outcomes of Architectural Distortion on Digital 2D Versus Tomosynthesis Mammography. Bahl M; Lamb LR; Lehman CD AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):1162-1167. PubMed ID: 28834441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of mammographically occult architectural distortion on digital breast tomosynthesis screening: initial clinical experience. Partyka L; Lourenco AP; Mainiero MB AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jul; 203(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 24951218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pathology results of architectural distortion on detected with digital breast tomosynthesis without definite sonographic correlate. Walcott-Sapp S; Garreau J; Johnson N; Thomas KA Am J Surg; 2019 May; 217(5):857-861. PubMed ID: 30777292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Benign breast papillomas without atypia diagnosed with core needle biopsy: Outcome of surgical excision and imaging follow-up. Polat DS; Knippa EE; Ganti R; Seiler SJ; Goudreau SH Eur J Radiol; 2020 Oct; 131():109237. PubMed ID: 32905954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Upgrade risk of image-targeted radial scar and complex sclerosing lesions diagnosed at needle-guided biopsy: a retrospective study. Darras C; Uchida M Eur Radiol; 2023 Dec; 33(12):8399-8406. PubMed ID: 37386299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital Mammography Stereotactic Biopsy versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-guided Biopsy: Differences in Biopsy Targets, Pathologic Results, and Discordance Rates. Rochat CJ; Baird GL; Lourenco AP Radiology; 2020 Mar; 294(3):518-527. PubMed ID: 31961261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Architectural Distortion on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Management Algorithm and Pathological Outcome. Samreen N; Moy L; Lee CS J Breast Imaging; 2020 Sep; 2(5):424-435. PubMed ID: 38424901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radial scars diagnosed on breast core biopsy: Frequency of atypia and carcinoma on excision and implications for management. Donaldson AR; Sieck L; Booth CN; Calhoun BC Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():201-207. PubMed ID: 27371970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Malignancy Upgrade Rates of Radial Sclerosing Lesions at Breast Cancer Screening. Yan P; DeMello L; Baird GL; Lourenco AP Radiol Imaging Cancer; 2021 Nov; 3(6):e210036. PubMed ID: 34766844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pathologic Upgrade Rates of High-Risk Breast Lesions on Digital Two-Dimensional vs Tomosynthesis Mammography. Lamb LR; Bahl M; Hughes KS; Lehman CD J Am Coll Surg; 2018 May; 226(5):858-867. PubMed ID: 29410346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. DETECTION OF BREAST CANCERS REPRESENTED AS ARCHITECTURAL DISTORTION: A COMPARISON OF FULL-FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY AND DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS. Babkina TM; Gurando AV; Kozarenko TM; Gurando VR; Telniy VV; Pominchuk DV Wiad Lek; 2021; 74(7):1674-1679. PubMed ID: 34459770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pathologic Outcomes in Single Versus Multiple Areas of Architectural Distortion on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. Wang LC; Philip M; Bhole S; Rao S; Gupta D; Schacht D; Friedewald SM; Anders R AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Jan; 220(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 35895298 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Architectural distortion in the era of digital breast tomosynthesis: outcomes and implications for management. Pujara AC; Hui J; Wang LC Clin Imaging; 2019; 54():133-137. PubMed ID: 30639524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Management of radial scars/complex sclerosing lesions of the breast diagnosed on vacuum-assisted large-core biopsy: is surgery always necessary? Bacci J; MacGrogan G; Alran L; Labrot-Hurtevent G Histopathology; 2019 Dec; 75(6):900-915. PubMed ID: 31286532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]