These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35107615)

  • 1. Sonographic risk assessment for an unplanned operative delivery: a prospective study.
    Perlman S; Schreiber H; Kivilevitch Z; Bardin R; Kassif E; Achiron R; Gilboa Y
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Nov; 306(5):1469-1475. PubMed ID: 35107615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fetal head circumference and subpubic angle are independent risk factors for unplanned cesarean and operative delivery.
    Rizzo G; Aiello E; Bosi C; D'Antonio F; Arduini D
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Aug; 96(8):1006-1011. PubMed ID: 28449356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of cesarean delivery in the term nulliparous woman: results from the prospective, multicenter Genesis study.
    Burke N; Burke G; Breathnach F; McAuliffe F; Morrison JJ; Turner M; Dornan S; Higgins JR; Cotter A; Geary M; McParland P; Daly S; Cody F; Dicker P; Tully E; Malone FD;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 216(6):598.e1-598.e11. PubMed ID: 28213060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A simple model to predict the complicated operative vaginal deliveries using vacuum or forceps.
    Sainz JA; García-Mejido JA; Aquise A; Borrero C; Bonomi MJ; Fernández-Palacín A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 220(2):193.e1-193.e12. PubMed ID: 30391443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women with a prolonged second stage of labor: the value of intrapartum ultrasound.
    Dall'Asta A; Angeli L; Masturzo B; Volpe N; Schera GBL; Di Pasquo E; Girlando F; Attini R; Menato G; Frusca T; Ghi T
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):642.e1-642.e13. PubMed ID: 31589867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transperineal sonographic assessment of angle of progression as a predictor of successful vaginal delivery following induction of labor.
    Gillor M; Vaisbuch E; Zaks S; Barak O; Hagay Z; Levy R
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 49(2):240-245. PubMed ID: 27062415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of different methods of measuring angle of progression in prediction of labor outcome.
    Frick A; Kostiv V; Vojtassakova D; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 55(3):391-400. PubMed ID: 31692170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of the angle of progression and distance perineum-head in the prediction of type of delivery and duration of labor using intrapartum ultrasonography.
    Carvalho Neto RH; Viana Junior AB; Moron AF; Araujo Júnior E; Carvalho FHC; Feitosa HN
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Jul; 34(14):2340-2348. PubMed ID: 31505974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vaginal delivery rate by near delivery sonographic weight estimation and maternal stature among nulliparous women.
    Meyer R; Yinon Y; Levin G
    Birth; 2023 Sep; 50(3):557-564. PubMed ID: 36153820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical and sonographic parameters at 37 weeks' gestation for predicting the risk of primary Cesarean delivery in nulliparous women.
    Kim SN; Park KH; Jung HJ; Hong JS; Shin DM; Kang WS
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Oct; 36(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 20586108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting cesarean delivery for failure to progress as an outcome of labor induction in term singleton pregnancy.
    Kamel RA; Negm SM; Youssef A; Bianchini L; Brunelli E; Pilu G; Soliman M; Nicolaides KH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 224(6):609.e1-609.e11. PubMed ID: 33412128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sonographic prediction of outcome of vacuum deliveries: a multicenter, prospective cohort study.
    Kahrs BH; Usman S; Ghi T; Youssef A; Torkildsen EA; Lindtjørn E; Østborg TB; Benediktsdottir S; Brooks L; Harmsen L; Romundstad PR; Salvesen KÅ; Lees CC; Eggebø TM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 217(1):69.e1-69.e10. PubMed ID: 28327433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sonographic markers of fetal adiposity and risk of Cesarean delivery.
    Hehir MP; Burke N; Burke G; Turner MJ; Breathnach FM; Mcauliffe FM; Morrison JJ; Dornan S; Higgins J; Cotter A; Geary MP; Mcparland P; Daly S; Cody F; Dicker P; Tully E; Malone FD
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 54(3):338-343. PubMed ID: 30887629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pubic Arch Angle Measurement by Transperineal Ultrasonography: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study.
    Carvalho Neto RH; Viana Junior AB; Moron AF; Araujo Júnior E; Carvalho FHC; Feitosa HN
    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2020 Apr; 42(4):181-187. PubMed ID: 32330959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Blinded ultrasound fetal biometry at 36 weeks and risk of emergency Cesarean delivery in a prospective cohort study of low-risk nulliparous women.
    Sovio U; Smith GCS
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 28452133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intrapartum ultrasound at the initiation of the active second stage of labor predicts spontaneous vaginal delivery.
    Hadad S; Oberman M; Ben-Arie A; Sacagiu M; Vaisbuch E; Levy R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jan; 3(1):100249. PubMed ID: 33451615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sonographic large fetal head circumference and risk of cesarean delivery.
    Lipschuetz M; Cohen SM; Israel A; Baron J; Porat S; Valsky DV; Yagel O; Amsalem H; Kabiri D; Gilboa Y; Sivan E; Unger R; Schiff E; Hershkovitz R; Yagel S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Mar; 218(3):339.e1-339.e7. PubMed ID: 29305249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Severe maternal and neonatal morbidity after attempted operative vaginal delivery.
    Panelli DM; Leonard SA; Joudi N; Girsen AI; Judy AE; El-Sayed YY; Gilbert WM; Lyell DJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 May; 3(3):100339. PubMed ID: 33631384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pubic arch angle in prolonged second stage of labor: clinical significance.
    Gilboa Y; Kivilevitch Z; Spira M; Kedem A; Katorza E; Moran O; Achiron R
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Apr; 41(4):442-6. PubMed ID: 23001876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlation between Subpubic Arch Angle and Mode of Delivery in Large-for-Gestational-Age Fetuses.
    Ghi T; Dall'Asta A; Suprani A; Aiello E; Musarò A; Bosi C; Pedrazzi G; Kiener A; Arduini D; Frusca T; Rizzo G
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2018; 44(3):221-227. PubMed ID: 29232667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.