BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35107984)

  • 1. Implications of Generation Efficiencies and Supply Chain Leaks for the Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Natural Gas-Fired Electricity in the United States.
    Tavakkoli S; Feng L; Miller SM; Jordaan SM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Feb; 56(4):2540-2550. PubMed ID: 35107984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Harmonization of initial estimates of shale gas life cycle greenhouse gas emissions for electric power generation.
    Heath GA; O'Donoughue P; Arent DJ; Bazilian M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Aug; 111(31):E3167-76. PubMed ID: 25049378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Environmental implications of United States coal exports: a comparative life cycle assessment of future power system scenarios.
    Bohnengel B; PatiƱo-Echeverri D; Bergerson J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Aug; 48(16):9908-16. PubMed ID: 25025127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Impacts of Coal and Imported Gas-Based Power Generation in the Indian Context.
    Mallapragada DS; Naik I; Ganesan K; Banerjee R; Laurenzi IJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Jan; 53(1):539-549. PubMed ID: 30495942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of the US EPA's determination of the role for CO2 capture and storage in new fossil fuel-fired power plants.
    Clark VR; Herzog HJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 48(14):7723-9. PubMed ID: 24960207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from U.S. liquefied natural gas exports: implications for end uses.
    Abrahams LS; Samaras C; Griffin WM; Matthews HS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 49(5):3237-45. PubMed ID: 25650513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative life-cycle air emissions of coal, domestic natural gas, LNG, and SNG for electricity generation.
    Jaramillo P; Griffin WM; Matthews HS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Sep; 41(17):6290-6. PubMed ID: 17937317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Country-Level Life Cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Liquefied Natural Gas Trade for Electricity Generation.
    Kasumu AS; Li V; Coleman JW; Liendo J; Jordaan SM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Feb; 52(4):1735-1746. PubMed ID: 29328654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implications of the recent reductions in natural gas prices for emissions of CO2 from the US power sector.
    Lu X; Salovaara J; McElroy MB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(5):3014-21. PubMed ID: 22321206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Time Value of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Life Cycle Assessment and Techno-Economic Analysis.
    Sproul E; Barlow J; Quinn JC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2019 May; 53(10):6073-6080. PubMed ID: 31013067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Emissions implications of future natural gas production and use in the U.S. and in the Rocky Mountain region.
    McLeod JD; Brinkman GL; Milford JB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Nov; 48(22):13036-44. PubMed ID: 25329514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatially and Temporally Resolved Analysis of Environmental Trade-Offs in Electricity Generation.
    Peer RA; Garrison JB; Timms CP; Sanders KT
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Apr; 50(8):4537-45. PubMed ID: 26967826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Techno-Economic Assessment and Life Cycle Assessment of CO
    Abuov Y; Serik G; Lee W
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Jun; 56(12):8571-8580. PubMed ID: 35653301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the environmental externalities for biomass- and coal-fired electricity generation in China: A supply chain perspective.
    Wang C; Zhang L; Zhou P; Chang Y; Zhou D; Pang M; Yin H
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Sep; 246():758-767. PubMed ID: 31228689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Natural gas fugitive emissions rates constrained by global atmospheric methane and ethane.
    Schwietzke S; Griffin WM; Matthews HS; Bruhwiler LM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 48(14):7714-22. PubMed ID: 24945600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Well-to-wheel greenhouse gas emissions of electric versus combustion vehicles from 2018 to 2030 in the US.
    Challa R; Kamath D; Anctil A
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Apr; 308():114592. PubMed ID: 35121453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methane emissions from natural gas compressor stations in the transmission and storage sector: measurements and comparisons with the EPA greenhouse gas reporting program protocol.
    Subramanian R; Williams LL; Vaughn TL; Zimmerle D; Roscioli JR; Herndon SC; Yacovitch TI; Floerchinger C; Tkacik DS; Mitchell AL; Sullivan MR; Dallmann TR; Robinson AL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 49(5):3252-61. PubMed ID: 25668051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Regionalized Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Forest Biomass Use for Electricity Generation in the United States.
    Xu H; Latta G; Lee U; Lewandrowski J; Wang M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Nov; 55(21):14806-14816. PubMed ID: 34652143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ultra-Low Carbon Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants through Bio-Oil Co-Firing and Biochar Sequestration.
    Dang Q; Mba Wright M; Brown RC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Dec; 49(24):14688-95. PubMed ID: 26545153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.