247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35107984)
1. Implications of Generation Efficiencies and Supply Chain Leaks for the Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Natural Gas-Fired Electricity in the United States.
Tavakkoli S; Feng L; Miller SM; Jordaan SM
Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Feb; 56(4):2540-2550. PubMed ID: 35107984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Harmonization of initial estimates of shale gas life cycle greenhouse gas emissions for electric power generation.
Heath GA; O'Donoughue P; Arent DJ; Bazilian M
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Aug; 111(31):E3167-76. PubMed ID: 25049378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Environmental implications of United States coal exports: a comparative life cycle assessment of future power system scenarios.
Bohnengel B; PatiƱo-Echeverri D; Bergerson J
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Aug; 48(16):9908-16. PubMed ID: 25025127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Impacts of Coal and Imported Gas-Based Power Generation in the Indian Context.
Mallapragada DS; Naik I; Ganesan K; Banerjee R; Laurenzi IJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Jan; 53(1):539-549. PubMed ID: 30495942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of the US EPA's determination of the role for CO2 capture and storage in new fossil fuel-fired power plants.
Clark VR; Herzog HJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 48(14):7723-9. PubMed ID: 24960207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from U.S. liquefied natural gas exports: implications for end uses.
Abrahams LS; Samaras C; Griffin WM; Matthews HS
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 49(5):3237-45. PubMed ID: 25650513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative life-cycle air emissions of coal, domestic natural gas, LNG, and SNG for electricity generation.
Jaramillo P; Griffin WM; Matthews HS
Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Sep; 41(17):6290-6. PubMed ID: 17937317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Country-Level Life Cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Liquefied Natural Gas Trade for Electricity Generation.
Kasumu AS; Li V; Coleman JW; Liendo J; Jordaan SM
Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Feb; 52(4):1735-1746. PubMed ID: 29328654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implications of the recent reductions in natural gas prices for emissions of CO2 from the US power sector.
Lu X; Salovaara J; McElroy MB
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(5):3014-21. PubMed ID: 22321206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Time Value of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Life Cycle Assessment and Techno-Economic Analysis.
Sproul E; Barlow J; Quinn JC
Environ Sci Technol; 2019 May; 53(10):6073-6080. PubMed ID: 31013067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Emissions implications of future natural gas production and use in the U.S. and in the Rocky Mountain region.
McLeod JD; Brinkman GL; Milford JB
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Nov; 48(22):13036-44. PubMed ID: 25329514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spatially and Temporally Resolved Analysis of Environmental Trade-Offs in Electricity Generation.
Peer RA; Garrison JB; Timms CP; Sanders KT
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Apr; 50(8):4537-45. PubMed ID: 26967826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Techno-Economic Assessment and Life Cycle Assessment of CO
Abuov Y; Serik G; Lee W
Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Jun; 56(12):8571-8580. PubMed ID: 35653301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing the environmental externalities for biomass- and coal-fired electricity generation in China: A supply chain perspective.
Wang C; Zhang L; Zhou P; Chang Y; Zhou D; Pang M; Yin H
J Environ Manage; 2019 Sep; 246():758-767. PubMed ID: 31228689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Natural gas fugitive emissions rates constrained by global atmospheric methane and ethane.
Schwietzke S; Griffin WM; Matthews HS; Bruhwiler LM
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 48(14):7714-22. PubMed ID: 24945600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Well-to-wheel greenhouse gas emissions of electric versus combustion vehicles from 2018 to 2030 in the US.
Challa R; Kamath D; Anctil A
J Environ Manage; 2022 Apr; 308():114592. PubMed ID: 35121453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Methane emissions from natural gas compressor stations in the transmission and storage sector: measurements and comparisons with the EPA greenhouse gas reporting program protocol.
Subramanian R; Williams LL; Vaughn TL; Zimmerle D; Roscioli JR; Herndon SC; Yacovitch TI; Floerchinger C; Tkacik DS; Mitchell AL; Sullivan MR; Dallmann TR; Robinson AL
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 49(5):3252-61. PubMed ID: 25668051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Regionalized Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Forest Biomass Use for Electricity Generation in the United States.
Xu H; Latta G; Lee U; Lewandrowski J; Wang M
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Nov; 55(21):14806-14816. PubMed ID: 34652143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultra-Low Carbon Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants through Bio-Oil Co-Firing and Biochar Sequestration.
Dang Q; Mba Wright M; Brown RC
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Dec; 49(24):14688-95. PubMed ID: 26545153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]