129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35108142)
1. Improved post-injury cognitive test results: examining invalid baseline ImPACT testing.
Manderino LM; Gunstad J
Brain Inj; 2022 Mar; 36(4):572-578. PubMed ID: 35108142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prevalence of invalid ImPACT baseline test results among high school athletes with invalidity and sandbagging indices.
Tsushima WT; Lawton DRY; Kimata C; Siu AM
Clin Neuropsychol; 2023 Oct; 37(7):1516-1529. PubMed ID: 36458597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Rates and Predictors of Invalid Baseline Test Performance in High School and Collegiate Athletes for 3 Computerized Neurocognitive Tests: ANAM, Axon Sports, and ImPACT.
Nelson LD; Pfaller AY; Rein LE; McCrea MA
Am J Sports Med; 2015 Aug; 43(8):2018-26. PubMed ID: 26059178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. American Medical Society for Sports Medicine position statement: concussion in sport.
Harmon KG; Drezner JA; Gammons M; Guskiewicz KM; Halstead M; Herring SA; Kutcher JS; Pana A; Putukian M; Roberts WO
Br J Sports Med; 2013 Jan; 47(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 23243113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing Protocol Validity Indices.
Manderino LM; Gunstad J
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2018 Aug; 33(5):596-605. PubMed ID: 29088321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Baseline Neurocognitive Performance and Clearance for Athletes to Return to Contact.
Asken BM; Clugston JR; Snyder AR; Bauer RM
J Athl Train; 2017 Jan; 52(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 27905859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Utility of VOMS, SCAT3, and ImPACT Baseline Evaluations for Acute Concussion Identification in Collegiate Athletes: Findings From the NCAA-DoD Concussion Assessment, Research and Education (CARE) Consortium.
Ferris LM; Kontos AP; Eagle SR; Elbin RJ; Collins MW; Mucha A; McAllister TW; Broglio SP; McCrea M; Pasquina PF; Port NL
Am J Sports Med; 2022 Mar; 50(4):1106-1119. PubMed ID: 35179972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Advanced topics in neuropsychological assessment following sport-related concussion.
Iverson GL; Schatz P
Brain Inj; 2015; 29(2):263-75. PubMed ID: 25313596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Methodological considerations of assessing meaningful/reliable change in computerized neurocognitive testing following sport-related concussion.
Merz ZC; Lichtenstein JD; Lace JW
Appl Neuropsychol Child; 2022; 11(4):725-733. PubMed ID: 34293970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An updated review of the prevalence of invalid performance on the Immediate Post-Concussion and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT).
Messa I; Korcsog K; Abeare C
Clin Neuropsychol; 2022 Oct; 36(7):1613-1636. PubMed ID: 33356881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of validity criteria on Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) test-retest reliability among high school athletes.
Brett BL; Solomon GS
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2017 Apr; 39(3):286-295. PubMed ID: 27585635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Age and test setting affect the prevalence of invalid baseline scores on neurocognitive tests.
Lichtenstein JD; Moser RS; Schatz P
Am J Sports Med; 2014 Feb; 42(2):479-84. PubMed ID: 24243771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing Preseason Baseline Cognitive Functioning in High School Student Athletes: A "Hybrid" Approach.
Ransom DM; Ahumada L; Amankwah EK; Katzenstein JM; Goldenberg NA; Mularoni PP
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2022 Oct; 37(7):1545-1554. PubMed ID: 35570831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Relation Between Testing Environment and Baseline Performance in Child and Adolescent Concussion Assessment.
Vaughan CG; Gerst EH; Sady MD; Newman JB; Gioia GA
Am J Sports Med; 2014 Jul; 42(7):1716-23. PubMed ID: 24787043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sex differences in baseline neuropsychological function and concussion symptoms of collegiate athletes.
Covassin T; Swanik CB; Sachs M; Kendrick Z; Schatz P; Zillmer E; Kaminaris C
Br J Sports Med; 2006 Nov; 40(11):923-7; discussion 927. PubMed ID: 16990442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sensitivity and specificity of the online version of ImPACT in high school and collegiate athletes.
Schatz P; Sandel N
Am J Sports Med; 2013 Feb; 41(2):321-6. PubMed ID: 23144368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of baseline and post-concussion ImPACT test scores in young athletes with stimulant-treated and untreated ADHD.
Gardner RM; Yengo-Kahn A; Bonfield CM; Solomon GS
Phys Sportsmed; 2017 Feb; 45(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 27736285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Self-reported history of seizure and baseline neurocognitive test performance in student-athletes: an initial investigation.
Zalneraitis BH; Yengo-Kahn AM; Pawlukiewicz AJ; Solomon GS
Phys Sportsmed; 2017 Nov; 45(4):470-474. PubMed ID: 28838286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Utility of repeated assessment after invalid baseline neurocognitive test performance.
Schatz P; Kelley T; Ott SD; Solomon GS; Elbin RJ; Higgins K; Moser RS
J Athl Train; 2014; 49(5):659-64. PubMed ID: 25162778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Collegiate Student Athletes With History of ADHD or Academic Difficulties Are More Likely to Produce an Invalid Protocol on Baseline ImPACT Testing.
Manderino L; Gunstad J
Clin J Sport Med; 2018 Mar; 28(2):111-116. PubMed ID: 28731886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
