148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35108222)
21. Significance of KRAS mutation testing in biliary brushing cytology specimens: A 10-year retrospective review.
Sun T; Zuo T; Hui P; Cai G
Cancer Cytopathol; 2022 Jul; 130(7):558-565. PubMed ID: 35417072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Biliary Brush Cytology Revisited.
Mehmood S; Loya A; Yusuf MA
Acta Cytol; 2016; 60(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 27221813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Endoscopic retrograde forceps biopsy and brush cytology of biliary strictures: a prospective study.
Pugliese V; Conio M; Nicolò G; Saccomanno S; Gatteschi B
Gastrointest Endosc; 1995 Dec; 42(6):520-6. PubMed ID: 8674921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparison of routine cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of malignant bile duct strictures.
Kipp BR; Stadheim LM; Halling SA; Pochron NL; Harmsen S; Nagorney DM; Sebo TJ; Therneau TM; Gores GJ; de Groen PC; Baron TH; Levy MJ; Halling KC; Roberts LR
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1675-81. PubMed ID: 15330900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Multidisciplinary Approach to Indeterminate Biliary Strictures.
Nabi Z; Reddy DN
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2022 Jul; 32(3):411-425. PubMed ID: 35691689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Biliary brush cytology in the assessment of biliary strictures at a tertiary center in Iran.
Mohammad Alizadeh AH; Mousavi M; Salehi B; Molaei M; Khodadoostan M; Afzali ES; Dadvar Z; Mirsattari D; Aghdaei HA; Lahmi F; Zali MR
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(10):2793-6. PubMed ID: 22320994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Predictive factors for positive diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures by transpapillary brush cytology and forceps biopsy.
Naitoh I; Nakazawa T; Kato A; Hayashi K; Miyabe K; Shimizu S; Kondo H; Nishi Y; Yoshida M; Umemura S; Hori Y; Kuno T; Takahashi S; Ohara H; Joh T
J Dig Dis; 2016 Jan; 17(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 26717051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Endoscopic cytology in biliary strictures. Personal experience.
Geraci G; Pisello F; Arnone E; Modica G; Sciumè C
G Chir; 2008 Oct; 29(10):403-6. PubMed ID: 18947461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The Diagnostic Yield of Malignancy Comparing Cytology, FISH, and Molecular Analysis of Cell Free Cytology Brush Supernatant in Patients With Biliary Strictures Undergoing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography (ERC): A Prospective Study.
Kushnir VM; Mullady DK; Das K; Lang G; Hollander TG; Murad FM; Jackson SA; Toney NA; Finkelstein SD; Edmundowicz SA
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2019 Oct; 53(9):686-692. PubMed ID: 30106834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinical significance of bile cytology via an endoscopic nasobiliary drainage tube for pathological diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures.
Yagioka H; Hirano K; Isayama H; Tsujino T; Sasahira N; Nagano R; Hamada T; Miyabayashi K; Ito Y; Mohri D; Kawakubo K; Kogure H; Sasaki T; Tada M; Koike K
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2011 Mar; 18(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 20931342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Diagnosing Biliary Malignancy.
Xu MM; Sethi A
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2015 Oct; 25(4):677-90. PubMed ID: 26431597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Efficacy of digital single-operator cholangioscopy and factors affecting its accuracy in the evaluation of indeterminate biliary stricture.
Jang S; Stevens T; Kou L; Vargo JJ; Parsi MA
Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Feb; 91(2):385-393.e1. PubMed ID: 31541625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Mechanical Perspective on Increasing Brush Cytology Yield.
Khamaysi I; Firman R; Martin P; Vasilyev G; Boyko E; Zussman E
ACS Biomater Sci Eng; 2024 Mar; 10(3):1743-1752. PubMed ID: 38373217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Validation of the diagnostic accuracy of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for the characterization of indeterminate biliary strictures: results of a prospective multicenter international study.
Slivka A; Gan I; Jamidar P; Costamagna G; Cesaro P; Giovannini M; Caillol F; Kahaleh M
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Feb; 81(2):282-90. PubMed ID: 25616752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Factors affecting the diagnostic yield of endoscopic transpapillary forceps biopsy in patients with malignant biliary strictures.
Yang MJ; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Yoo BM; Kim JH
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Aug; 36(8):2324-2328. PubMed ID: 33729610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Diagnostic and prognostic implications of DNA ploidy and S-phase evaluation in the assessment of malignancy in biliary strictures.
Lindberg B; Enochsson L; Tribukait B; Arnelo U; Bergquist A
Endoscopy; 2006 Jun; 38(6):561-5. PubMed ID: 16802266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of single operator cholangioscopy on accuracy of bile duct cytology.
Aly FZ; Mostofizadeh S; Jawaid S; Knapik J; Mukhtar F; Klein R
Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Dec; 48(12):1230-1236. PubMed ID: 32770823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Digital, single-operator cholangiopancreatoscopy in the diagnosis and management of pancreatobiliary disorders: a multicenter clinical experience (with video).
Navaneethan U; Hasan MK; Kommaraju K; Zhu X; Hebert-Magee S; Hawes RH; Vargo JJ; Varadarajulu S; Parsi MA
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Oct; 84(4):649-55. PubMed ID: 26995690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Same-session endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-based tissue sampling in suspected malignant biliary obstruction: A multicenter experience.
Jo JH; Cho CM; Jun JH; Chung MJ; Kim TH; Seo DW; Kim J; Park DH;
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Apr; 34(4):799-805. PubMed ID: 30378169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for the pathological diagnosis of suspected malignant bile duct strictures.
Chang HY; Liu B; Wang YZ; Wang WJ; Wang W; Li D; Li YL
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Mar; 99(11):e19545. PubMed ID: 32176109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
