These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35112287)

  • 1. Quantifying children's sensorimotor experience: Child body-object interaction ratings for 3359 English words.
    Muraki EJ; Siddiqui IA; Pexman PM
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Dec; 54(6):2864-2877. PubMed ID: 35112287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantifying sensorimotor experience: Body-object interaction ratings for more than 9,000 English words.
    Pexman PM; Muraki E; Sidhu DM; Siakaluk PD; Yap MJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):453-466. PubMed ID: 30484218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Getting a grip on sensorimotor effects in lexical-semantic processing.
    Heard A; Madan CR; Protzner AB; Pexman PM
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Feb; 51(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 29967978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of Embodied Word Meanings: Sensorimotor Effects in Children's Lexical Processing.
    Inkster M; Wellsby M; Lloyd E; Pexman PM
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():317. PubMed ID: 27014129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The benefits of sensorimotor knowledge: body-object interaction facilitates semantic processing.
    Siakaluk PD; Pexman PM; Sears CR; Wilson K; Locheed K; Owen WJ
    Cogn Sci; 2008 Apr; 32(3):591-605. PubMed ID: 21635348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Context matters: How do task demands modulate the recruitment of sensorimotor information during language processing?
    Muraki EJ; Doyle A; Protzner AB; Pexman PM
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():976954. PubMed ID: 36733894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence for the activation of sensorimotor information during visual word recognition: the body-object interaction effect.
    Siakaluk PD; Pexman PM; Aguilera L; Owen WJ; Sears CR
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):433-43. PubMed ID: 17258186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Body-object interaction effect in word recognition and its relationship with screen time in Chinese children.
    Xu Z; Liu D
    Read Writ; 2022 Jan; ():1-28. PubMed ID: 35125652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of bodily experience on children's language processing.
    Wellsby M; Pexman PM
    Top Cogn Sci; 2014 Jul; 6(3):425-41. PubMed ID: 25060918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Body-object interaction ratings for 3600 French nouns.
    Lalancette A; Garneau É; Cochrane A; Wilson MA
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Oct; 56(7):8009-8021. PubMed ID: 39048859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of body-object interaction in children's concept processing: insights from two Chinese communities.
    Xu Z; Liu D
    Cogn Process; 2024 Aug; 25(3):457-465. PubMed ID: 38587612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Body-object interaction ratings for 1,618 monosyllabic nouns.
    Tillotson SM; Siakaluk PD; Pexman PM
    Behav Res Methods; 2008 Nov; 40(4):1075-8. PubMed ID: 19001398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fine motor skills enhance lexical processing of embodied vocabulary: A test of the nimble-hands, nimble-minds hypothesis.
    Suggate S; Stoeger H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):2169-2187. PubMed ID: 27557364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Flexible recruitment of semantic richness: context modulates body-object interaction effects in lexical-semantic processing.
    Tousignant C; Pexman PM
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2012; 6():53. PubMed ID: 22435058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The neural correlates of the body-object interaction effect in semantic processing.
    Hargreaves IS; Leonard GA; Pexman PM; Pittman DJ; Siakaluk PD; Goodyear BG
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2012 Jan; 6():22. PubMed ID: 22375111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can you touch the N400? The interactive effects of body-object interaction and task demands on N400 amplitudes and decision latencies.
    Al-Azary H; Yu T; McRae K
    Brain Lang; 2022 Aug; 231():105147. PubMed ID: 35728448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meaning in hand: Investigating shared mechanisms of motor imagery and sensorimotor simulation in language processing.
    Muraki EJ; Dahm SF; Pexman PM
    Cognition; 2023 Nov; 240():105589. PubMed ID: 37566931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the roles of form systematicity and sensorimotor effects in language processing.
    de Zubicaray GI; Arciuli J; Kearney E; Guenther F; McMahon KL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Mar; 49(3):431-444. PubMed ID: 36548090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simulating semantics: Are individual differences in motor imagery related to sensorimotor effects in language processing?
    Muraki EJ; Pexman PM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Dec; 47(12):1939-1957. PubMed ID: 34197170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On choosing the vehicles of metaphors 2.0: the interactive effects of semantic neighborhood density and body-object interaction on metaphor production.
    Al-Azary H; Katz AN
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1216561. PubMed ID: 37731883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.