These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35112310)

  • 1. Systemic effects of selection history on learned ignoring.
    Kim A; Anderson B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Aug; 29(4):1347-1354. PubMed ID: 35112310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical learning of distractor shape modulates attentional capture.
    Kim H; Ogden A; Anderson BA
    Vision Res; 2023 Jan; 202():108155. PubMed ID: 36417810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Post-capture processes contribute to statistical learning of distractor locations in visual search.
    Sauter M; Hanning NM; Liesefeld HR; Müller HJ
    Cortex; 2021 Feb; 135():108-126. PubMed ID: 33360756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The development of oculomotor suppression of salient distractors in children.
    Blakley EC; Gaspelin N; Gerhardstein P
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2022 Feb; 214():105291. PubMed ID: 34607075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. This is a test: Oculomotor capture when the experiment keeps score.
    Anderson BA; Mrkonja L
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Oct; 84(7):2115-2126. PubMed ID: 35918585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Value-modulated oculomotor capture by task-irrelevant stimuli is a consequence of early competition on the saccade map.
    Pearson D; Osborn R; Whitford TJ; Failing M; Theeuwes J; Le Pelley ME
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):2226-40. PubMed ID: 27184056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. More capture, more suppression: Distractor suppression due to statistical regularities is determined by the magnitude of attentional capture.
    Failing M; Theeuwes J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Feb; 27(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 31848910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical regularities bias overt attention.
    Wang B; Samara I; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug; 81(6):1813-1821. PubMed ID: 30919311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combined influence of valence and statistical learning on the control of attention II: Evidence from within-domain additivity.
    Ogden A; Kim H; Anderson BA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Feb; 85(2):277-283. PubMed ID: 36536205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A temporal dependency account of attentional inhibition in oculomotor control.
    Weaver MD; van Zoest W; Hickey C
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 147():880-894. PubMed ID: 27836709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combined influence of valence and statistical learning on the control of attention: Evidence for independent sources of bias.
    Kim H; Anderson BA
    Cognition; 2021 Mar; 208():104554. PubMed ID: 33360961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early top-down control over saccadic target selection: Evidence from a systematic salience difference manipulation.
    Goschy H; Koch AI; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Feb; 76(2):367-82. PubMed ID: 24323673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Strategic Distractor Suppression Improves Selective Control in Human Vision.
    van Zoest W; Huber-Huber C; Weaver MD; Hickey C
    J Neurosci; 2021 Aug; 41(33):7120-7135. PubMed ID: 34244360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The attractiveness of salient distractors to reaching movements is task dependent.
    Nissens T; Fiehler K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2502-2515. PubMed ID: 32026449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Probing the Neural Mechanisms for Distractor Filtering and Their History-Contingent Modulation by Means of TMS.
    Lega C; Ferrante O; Marini F; Santandrea E; Cattaneo L; Chelazzi L
    J Neurosci; 2019 Sep; 39(38):7591-7603. PubMed ID: 31387915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Salience-based selection: attentional capture by distractors less salient than the target.
    Zehetleitner M; Koch AI; Goschy H; Müller HJ
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e52595. PubMed ID: 23382820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering.
    Ferrante O; Patacca A; Di Caro V; Della Libera C; Santandrea E; Chelazzi L
    Cortex; 2018 May; 102():67-95. PubMed ID: 29096874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities in a visual detection task.
    van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Feb; 84(2):450-458. PubMed ID: 34773244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Distracted by danger: Temporal and spatial dynamics of visual selection in the presence of threat.
    Mulckhuyse M; Dalmaijer ES
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 16(2):315-24. PubMed ID: 26546018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.