130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35112350)
1. A comparison of three decalcification agents for assessments of cranial fracture histomorphology.
Cornelison JB; Isaac CV; Devota CJ; Billian J; Brown TT; deJong JL; Douglas EA; Fisher-Hubbard AO; Lackey-Cornelison WL; Prahlow JA; Shattuck BL
J Forensic Sci; 2022 May; 67(3):1157-1166. PubMed ID: 35112350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of EDTA and nitric acid solutions for decalcification of joints in AG/WT, BALB/c, C57, DBA1/J mice, and in Wistar rats.
Freitas EC; Dalmolin SP; da Silva MM; de Oliveira FH; Pilar EFS
Biotech Histochem; 2022 Jul; 97(5):372-381. PubMed ID: 34845957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Different Decalcification Methods Using Rat Mandibles as a Model.
Savi FM; Brierly GI; Baldwin J; Theodoropoulos C; Woodruff MA
J Histochem Cytochem; 2017 Dec; 65(12):705-722. PubMed ID: 28958188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Quality Analysis of Bony Specimens for Optimal Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA) Decalcification.
Craig JC; Freeman M; Walton S; Rogers D; Mehrad M; Gordetsky JB
Int J Surg Pathol; 2022 Dec; 30(8):853-860. PubMed ID: 35343279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Tissue Morphology and Antigenicity in Mouse and Rat Tibia: Comparing 12 Different Decalcification Conditions.
Bogoevski K; Woloszyk A; Blackwood K; Woodruff MA; Glatt V
J Histochem Cytochem; 2019 Aug; 67(8):545-561. PubMed ID: 31090479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of ultrasound accelerates the decalcification process of bone matrix without affecting histological and immunohistochemical analysis.
Chow DH; Zheng L; Tian L; Ho KS; Qin L; Guo X
J Orthop Translat; 2019 Apr; 17():112-120. PubMed ID: 31194084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tooth decalcification using different decalcifying agents - A comparative study.
Khangura AK; Gupta S; Gulati A; Singh S
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol; 2021; 25(3):463-469. PubMed ID: 35281150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. One-Step Preservation and Decalcification of Bony Tissue for Molecular Profiling.
Mueller C; Harpole MG; Espina V
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1606():85-102. PubMed ID: 28501995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative study of various decalcification techniques.
Prasad P; Donoghue M
Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(3):302-8. PubMed ID: 24025875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Proposal of an appropriate decalcification method of bone marrow biopsy specimens in the era of expanding genetic molecular study.
Choi SE; Hong SW; Yoon SO
J Pathol Transl Med; 2015 May; 49(3):236-42. PubMed ID: 26018515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Decalcification Techniques for Rat Femurs Using HE and Immunohistochemical Staining.
Liu H; Zhu R; Liu C; Ma R; Wang L; Chen B; Li L; Niu J; Zhao D; Mo F; Fu M; Brömme D; Zhang D; Gao S
Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():9050754. PubMed ID: 28246608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between Conventional Decalcification and a Microwave-Assisted Method in Bone Tissue Affected with Mycetoma.
Salih MM
Biochem Res Int; 2020; 2020():6561980. PubMed ID: 32832156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. RNA preservation in decalcified cochlear samples.
Waissbluth S; Chan SW; Chen JZ; McIntosh M; Daniel SJ
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Feb; 34(2):331-7. PubMed ID: 23250382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tissue integrity, costs and time associated with different agents for histological bone preparation.
Abrantes AA; Rafacho A; Rivero ER; Mariano FV; Siqueira FM; Gondak RO
Microsc Res Tech; 2017 Apr; 80(4):344-349. PubMed ID: 28370969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Advantages of a combined method of decalcification compared to EDTA.
Castania VA; Silveira JW; Issy AC; Pitol DL; Castania ML; Neto AD; Bel EA; Defino HL
Microsc Res Tech; 2015 Feb; 78(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 25452153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of tissue decalcification on mRNA retention within bone for in-situ hybridization studies.
Walsh L; Freemont AJ; Hoyland JA
Int J Exp Pathol; 1993 Jun; 74(3):237-41. PubMed ID: 8392858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in ammonium hydroxide for reducing decalcification time.
Sanderson C; Radley K; Mayton L
Biotech Histochem; 1995 Jan; 70(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 7540046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of routine decalcification methods with microwave decalcification of bone and teeth.
Sangeetha R; Uma K; Chandavarkar V
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol; 2013 Sep; 17(3):386-91. PubMed ID: 24574657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hypertonic saline- and detergent-accelerated EDTA-based decalcification better preserves mRNA of bones.
Li Z; Wenhart C; Reimann A; Cho YL; Adler K; Muench G
Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):10888. PubMed ID: 38740835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of bone decalcification procedures on DNA in situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization. EDTA is highly preferable to a routinely used acid decalcifier.
Alers JC; Krijtenburg PJ; Vissers KJ; van Dekken H
J Histochem Cytochem; 1999 May; 47(5):703-10. PubMed ID: 10219063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
