These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35113695)

  • 1. Science needs affirmative action.
    Thorp HH
    Science; 2022 Feb; 375(6580):473. PubMed ID: 35113695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The consequences of premature abandonment of affirmative action in medical school admissions.
    Cohen JJ
    JAMA; 2003 Mar; 289(9):1143-9. PubMed ID: 12622585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Raising the bar on achieving racial diversity in higher education: the United States Supreme Court's decision in Fisher v University of Texas.
    Rosenbaum S; Teitelbaum J; Scott J
    Acad Med; 2013 Dec; 88(12):1792-4. PubMed ID: 24128633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law.
    Denniston L
    Sun; 1992 Aug; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perspectives on affirmative action in academic dental institutions: the U.S. Supreme Court rulings in the University of Michigan cases.
    Peterson MR; Kowolik JE; Coleman G; Dietrich S; Mascarenhas AK; McCunniff M; Taylor G
    J Dent Educ; 2004 Sep; 68(9):932-7. PubMed ID: 15342653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Supreme Court refuses to review clinic access law; Second Appeals Court upholds statute.
    Reprod Freedom News; 1995 Jun; 4(13):2-3. PubMed ID: 12346292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Affirmative action after the Supreme Court's 1988-1989 term: what employers need to know.
    Thacker RA
    Employ Relat Today; 1990; 17(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 10105600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Harvard v. Canada: the myc mouse that still squeaks in the maze of biopatent law.
    Deftos LJ
    Acad Med; 2001 Jul; 76(7):684-92. PubMed ID: 11448821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The United States Supreme Court and psychiatry in the 1990s.
    Ciccone JR
    Psychiatr Clin North Am; 1999 Mar; 22(1):197-211. PubMed ID: 10083955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Supreme Court refuses to hear appeal of 'hot and sexy' program.
    AIDS Policy Law; 1996 Mar; 11(5):5. PubMed ID: 11363268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Supreme Court's surprising decision on the Medicaid expansion: how will the federal government and states proceed?
    Rosenbaum S; Westmoreland TM
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2012 Aug; 31(8):1663-72. PubMed ID: 22869643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Holistic versus actuarial student selection.
    McGaghie WC; Kreiter CD
    Teach Learn Med; 2005; 17(1):89-91. PubMed ID: 15691821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Supreme Court declines to hear California clinic injunction challenge.
    Reprod Freedom News; 1997 Mar; 6(5):2. PubMed ID: 12292362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diversification of U.S. medical schools via affirmative action implementation.
    Lakhan SE
    BMC Med Educ; 2003 Sep; 3():6. PubMed ID: 13678423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Race-neutral admission approaches: Challenges and opportunities for medical schools.
    Steinecke A; Beaudreau J; Bletzinger RB; Terrell C
    Acad Med; 2007 Feb; 82(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 17264686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A plea for caution: violent video games, the Supreme Court, and the role of science.
    Hall RC; Day T; Hall RC
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2011 Apr; 86(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 21454733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is There a "Workable" Race-Neutral Alternative to Affirmative Action in College Admissions?
    Long MC
    J Policy Anal Manage; 2015; 34(1):162-183. PubMed ID: 25750473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The politics of abortion: a historical perspective.
    McKeegan M
    Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 8274866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Supreme Court bars mandatory parental role in minors' abortions.
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Aug; 8(4):37-9. PubMed ID: 12278191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
    Brown HO
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.