171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35113725)
61. The use of multiple time point dynamic positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with oral/head and neck cancer does not predictably identify metastatic cervical lymph nodes.
Carlson ER; Schaefferkoetter J; Townsend D; McCoy JM; Campbell PD; Long M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 71(1):162-77. PubMed ID: 22742956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. The efficacy of preoperative positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) for detection of lymph node metastasis in cervical and endometrial cancer: clinical and pathological factors influencing it.
Nogami Y; Banno K; Irie H; Iida M; Kisu I; Masugi Y; Tanaka K; Tominaga E; Okuda S; Murakami K; Aoki D
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2015 Jan; 45(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 25368102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Non-small cell lung cancer: Spectral computed tomography quantitative parameters for preoperative diagnosis of metastatic lymph nodes.
Yang F; Dong J; Wang X; Fu X; Zhang T
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Apr; 89():129-135. PubMed ID: 28267528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Artificial intelligence for pre-operative lymph node staging in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bedrikovetski S; Dudi-Venkata NN; Kroon HM; Seow W; Vather R; Carneiro G; Moore JW; Sammour T
BMC Cancer; 2021 Sep; 21(1):1058. PubMed ID: 34565338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Prediction of Lymph Node Maximum Standardized Uptake Value in Patients With Cancer Using a 3D Convolutional Neural Network: A Proof-of-Concept Study.
Shaish H; Mutasa S; Makkar J; Chang P; Schwartz L; Ahmed F
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Feb; 212(2):238-244. PubMed ID: 30540209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Diagnosis of Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Patients With Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Comparative Multi-Center Study of Semantic Features and Deep Learning-Based Models.
Abbasian Ardakani A; Mohammadi A; Mirza-Aghazadeh-Attari M; Faeghi F; Vogl TJ; Acharya UR
J Ultrasound Med; 2023 Jun; 42(6):1211-1221. PubMed ID: 36437513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of pelvic lymph node metastasis in bladder cancer.
Li Y; Diao F; Shi S; Li K; Zhu W; Wu S; Lin T
Chin J Cancer; 2018 Jan; 37(1):3. PubMed ID: 29370848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. [Preoperative assessment value of spectral CT quantitative parameters in lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer].
Chai Y; Gao J; Xing J; Lyu P; Liang P; Chen X
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Mar; 20(3):309-314. PubMed ID: 28338166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Preoperative assessment of cervical lymph node metastases in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma: Incremental diagnostic value of dual-energy CT combined with ultrasound.
Yoon J; Choi Y; Jang J; Shin NY; Ahn KJ; Kim BS
PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261233. PubMed ID: 34898649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Evaluation of dual energy spectral CT in differentiating metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes in rectal cancer: Initial experience.
Liu H; Yan F; Pan Z; Lin X; Luo X; Shi C; Chen X; Wang B; Zhang H
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Feb; 84(2):228-34. PubMed ID: 25497234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Prediction of lymph node metastasis in stage T1-2 rectal cancers with MRI-based deep learning.
Wan L; Hu J; Chen S; Zhao R; Peng W; Liu Y; Hu S; Zou S; Wang S; Zhao X; Zhang H
Eur Radiol; 2023 May; 33(5):3638-3646. PubMed ID: 36905470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Clinical significance of combined assessment of the maximum standardized uptake value of F-18 FDG PET with nodal size in the diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastasis of oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Matsubara R; Kawano S; Chikui T; Kiyosue T; Goto Y; Hirano M; Jinno T; Nagata T; Oobu K; Abe K; Nakamura S
Acad Radiol; 2012 Jun; 19(6):708-17. PubMed ID: 22484437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Assessment of cervical lymph node metastases using indirect computed tomography lymphography with iopamidol in a tongue VX2 carcinoma model.
Shu Y; Xu X; Wang Z; Dai W; Zhang Y; Yu Y; Sha Y; Wu H
J Laryngol Otol; 2011 Aug; 125(8):820-8. PubMed ID: 21729450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Prediction of Individual Lymph Node Metastatic Status in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using Routine Computed Tomography Imaging: Comparison of Size-Based Measurements and Radiomics-Based Models.
Xie C; Hu Y; Han L; Fu J; Vardhanabhuti V; Yang H
Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Dec; 29(13):8117-8126. PubMed ID: 36018524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Deep multimodal learning for lymph node metastasis prediction of primary thyroid cancer.
Wu X; Li M; Cui XW; Xu G
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Feb; 67(3):. PubMed ID: 35042207
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
76. Improved Diagnostic Accuracy Using Arterial Phase CT for Lateral Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis from Papillary Thyroid Cancer.
Park JE; Lee JH; Ryu KH; Park HS; Chung MS; Kim HW; Choi YJ; Baek JH
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2017 Apr; 38(4):782-788. PubMed ID: 28126748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Comparison of sonography and CT for differentiating benign from malignant cervical lymph nodes in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
Sumi M; Ohki M; Nakamura T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Apr; 176(4):1019-24. PubMed ID: 11264102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Deep learning system for lymph node quantification and metastatic cancer identification from whole-slide pathology images.
Hu Y; Su F; Dong K; Wang X; Zhao X; Jiang Y; Li J; Ji J; Sun Y
Gastric Cancer; 2021 Jul; 24(4):868-877. PubMed ID: 33484355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. [Comparative imaging study of mediastinal lymph node from pre-surgery dual energy CT
Zhu Q; Ren C; Zhang Y; Li MJ; Wang XH
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Aug; 52(4):730-737. PubMed ID: 32773811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Hounsfield units upon PET/CT are useful in evaluating metastatic regional lymph nodes in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Kim SH; Lee KN; Kang EJ; Kim DW; Hong SH
Br J Radiol; 2012 May; 85(1013):606-12. PubMed ID: 21304006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
