These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35114582)
1. Rectal swabs are a reliable method of assessing the colonic microbiome. Turner G; O'Grady M; Hudson D; Morgan X; Frizelle F; Purcell R Int J Med Microbiol; 2022 Feb; 312(2):151549. PubMed ID: 35114582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rectal Swabs from Critically Ill Patients Provide Discordant Representations of the Gut Microbiome Compared to Stool Samples. Fair K; Dunlap DG; Fitch A; Bogdanovich T; Methé B; Morris A; McVerry BJ; Kitsios GD mSphere; 2019 Jul; 4(4):. PubMed ID: 31341070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rectal swabs are a reliable proxy for faecal samples in infant gut microbiota research based on 16S-rRNA sequencing. Reyman M; van Houten MA; Arp K; Sanders EAM; Bogaert D Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16072. PubMed ID: 31690798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rectal swabs as a viable alternative to faecal sampling for the analysis of gut microbiota functionality and composition. Radhakrishnan ST; Gallagher KI; Mullish BH; Serrano-Contreras JI; Alexander JL; Miguens Blanco J; Danckert NP; Valdivia-Garcia M; Hopkins BJ; Ghai A; Ayub A; Li JV; Marchesi JR; Williams HRT Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):493. PubMed ID: 36627399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of bacterial community profiles from large intestine specimens, rectal swabs, and stool samples. Kwon YJ; Kwak HJ; Lee HK; Lim HC; Jung DH Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2021 Dec; 105(24):9273-9284. PubMed ID: 34773153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Standard rectal swabs as a surrogate sample for gut microbiome monitoring in intensive care. Schlebusch S; Graham RMA; Jennison AV; Lassig-Smith MM; Harris PNA; Lipman J; Ó Cuív P; Paterson DL BMC Microbiol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):99. PubMed ID: 35413802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Feasibility of using alternative swabs and storage solutions for paired SARS-CoV-2 detection and microbiome analysis in the hospital environment. Minich JJ; Ali F; Marotz C; Belda-Ferre P; Chiang L; Shaffer JP; Carpenter CS; McDonald D; Gilbert J; Allard SM; Allen EE; Knight R; Sweeney DA; Swafford AD Microbiome; 2021 Jan; 9(1):25. PubMed ID: 33482920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating rectal swab collection method for gut microbiome analysis in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Artim SC; Sheh A; Burns MA; Fox JG PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224950. PubMed ID: 31697779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing the Impact of Diet on the Mucosa-Adhered Microbiome in Piglets Using Comparative Analysis of Rectal Swabs and Colon Content. Choudhury R; Kleerebezem M Front Microbiol; 2022; 13():804986. PubMed ID: 35273582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Legitimate and Reliable Determination of the Age-Related Intestinal Microbiome in Young Piglets; Rectal Swabs and Fecal Samples Provide Comparable Insights. Choudhury R; Middelkoop A; Bolhuis JE; Kleerebezem M Front Microbiol; 2019; 10():1886. PubMed ID: 31474964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The bacterial density of clinical rectal swabs is highly variable, correlates with sequencing contamination, and predicts patient risk of extraintestinal infection. Chanderraj R; Brown CA; Hinkle K; Falkowski N; Woods RJ; Dickson RP Microbiome; 2022 Jan; 10(1):2. PubMed ID: 34991717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rectal and Naris Swabs: Practical and Informative Samples for Analyzing the Microbiota of Critically Ill Patients. Bansal S; Nguyen JP; Leligdowicz A; Zhang Y; Kain KC; Ricciuto DR; Coburn B mSphere; 2018 Jun; 3(3):. PubMed ID: 29898981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. First-Day-of-Life Rectal Swabs Fail To Represent Meconial Microbiota Composition and Underestimate the Presence of Antibiotic Resistance Genes. Graspeuntner S; Lupatsii M; Dashdorj L; Rody A; Rupp J; Bossung V; Härtel C Microbiol Spectr; 2023 Jun; 11(3):e0525422. PubMed ID: 37097170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differences in microbial signatures between rectal mucosal biopsies and rectal swabs. Araújo-Pérez F; McCoy AN; Okechukwu C; Carroll IM; Smith KM; Jeremiah K; Sandler RS; Asher GN; Keku TO Gut Microbes; 2012; 3(6):530-5. PubMed ID: 23060016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of nonlethal sampling methods for amphibian gut microbiome analyses. Zhou J; Nelson TM; Rodriguez Lopez C; Sarma RR; Zhou SJ; Rollins LA Mol Ecol Resour; 2020 Jul; 20(4):844-855. PubMed ID: 31990452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rectal swabs for analysis of the intestinal microbiota. Budding AE; Grasman ME; Eck A; Bogaards JA; Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM; van Bodegraven AA; Savelkoul PH PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e101344. PubMed ID: 25020051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of microbial signatures between paired faecal and rectal biopsy samples from healthy volunteers using next-generation sequencing and culturomics. Mukhopadhya I; Martin JC; Shaw S; McKinley AJ; Gratz SW; Scott KP Microbiome; 2022 Oct; 10(1):171. PubMed ID: 36242064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Usability of rectal swabs for microbiome sampling in a cohort study of hematological and oncological patients. Biehl LM; Garzetti D; Farowski F; Ring D; Koeppel MB; Rohde H; Schafhausen P; Stecher B; Vehreschild MJGT PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0215428. PubMed ID: 30986251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Ocular Microbiome Is Altered by Sampling Modality and Age. Katzka W; Dong TS; Luu K; Lagishetty V; Sedighian F; Arias-Jayo N; Jacobs JP; Hsu HY Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2021 Oct; 10(12):24. PubMed ID: 34661621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]