BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35116317)

  • 1. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Chen H; Liu Y; Peng H; Wang R; Wang K; Li D
    Transl Cancer Res; 2021 Nov; 10(11):4601-4616. PubMed ID: 35116317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes.
    Deng HY; Luo J; Li SX; Li G; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD
    Dis Esophagus; 2019 Jul; 32(7):. PubMed ID: 30496378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted, Video-Assisted, and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Mederos MA; de Virgilio MJ; Shenoy R; Ye L; Toste PA; Mak SS; Booth MS; Begashaw MM; Wilson M; Gunnar W; Shekelle PG; Maggard-Gibbons M; Girgis MD
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2129228. PubMed ID: 34724556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of short-term outcomes between robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy and video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating middle thoracic esophageal cancer.
    Deng HY; Huang WX; Li G; Li SX; Luo J; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD
    Dis Esophagus; 2018 Aug; 31(8):. PubMed ID: 29538633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.
    He H; Wu Q; Wang Z; Zhang Y; Chen N; Fu J; Zhang G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 May; 13(1):52. PubMed ID: 29792203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive, video-assisted minimally invasive, and open esophagectomy.
    Gong L; Jiang H; Yue J; Duan X; Tang P; Ren P; Zhao X; Liu X; Zhang X; Yu Z
    J Thorac Dis; 2020 Mar; 12(3):916-924. PubMed ID: 32274159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 18,187 patients.
    Perry R; Barbosa JP; Perry I; Barbosa J
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Mar; 18(1):125. PubMed ID: 38492067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for thoracic lymph node dissection in patients with squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective comparative cohort study.
    Lei J; Bai Y; Qiao Z; Ma J
    J Thorac Dis; 2024 Mar; 16(3):2115-2124. PubMed ID: 38617764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does robot-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy have superiority over thoraco-laparoscopic minimally invasive oesophagectomy in lymph node dissection?
    Li XK; Xu Y; Zhou H; Cong ZZ; Wu WJ; Qiang Y; Shen Y
    Dis Esophagus; 2021 Feb; 34(2):. PubMed ID: 32582945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus the conventional minimally invasive one: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
    Jin D; Yao L; Yu J; Liu R; Guo T; Yang K; Gou Y
    Int J Med Robot; 2019 Jun; 15(3):e1988. PubMed ID: 30737881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes between robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy and video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zheng C; Li XK; Zhang C; Zhou H; Ji SG; Zhong JH; Xu Y; Cong ZZ; Wang GM; Wu WJ; Shen Y
    J Thorac Dis; 2021 Feb; 13(2):708-719. PubMed ID: 33717543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploring the learning curve in minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review.
    Chan KS; Oo AM
    Dis Esophagus; 2023 Sep; 36(9):. PubMed ID: 36857586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer compared with video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center retrospective study.
    Morimoto Y; Kawakubo H; Ishikawa A; Matsuda S; Hijikata N; Ando M; Mayanagi S; Irino T; Nakamura R; Wada N; Tsuji T; Kitagawa Y
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2022 Apr; 15(2):270-278. PubMed ID: 34637190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Meta-analysis.
    Zhang Y; Dong D; Cao Y; Huang M; Li J; Zhang J; Lin J; Sarkaria IS; Toni L; David R; He J; Li H
    Ann Surg; 2023 Jul; 278(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 36538615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Novel "Modified Bascule Method" for Lymphadenectomy Along the Left Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve During Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.
    Oshikiri T; Takiguchi G; Urakawa N; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Kanaji S; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Nakamura T; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 28(9):4918-4927. PubMed ID: 33686596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparisons of short-term outcomes between robot-assisted, video-assisted, and open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment: a retrospective study.
    Wu Z; Liu J; Zhang L; Tang M; Shu W; van der Wilk BJ; Anker CJ; He Z; Wang L; Lv W; Zhu L; Hu J
    J Thorac Dis; 2024 Mar; 16(3):2019-2031. PubMed ID: 38617777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Xue M; Liu J; Lu M; Zhang H; Liu W; Tian H
    Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1293645. PubMed ID: 38288099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Initial introduction of robot-assisted, minimally invasive esophagectomy using the microanatomy-based concept in the upper mediastinum.
    Shirakawa Y; Noma K; Kunitomo T; Hashimoto M; Maeda N; Tanabe S; Sakurama K; Fujiwara T
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Dec; 35(12):6568-6576. PubMed ID: 33170337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Incidence of Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Palsy in Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive McKeown Esophagectomy in Prone Position: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.
    Oshikiri T; Goto H; Horikawa M; Urakawa N; Hasegawa H; Kanaji S; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Nakamura T; Kakeji Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Nov; 28(12):7249-7257. PubMed ID: 34032960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Initial experience with modified en bloc robot-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy for thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Sun HB; Liu XB; Xing WQ; Chen PN; Liu SL; Li P; Ma YX; Feng SK; Jiang D; Yan S
    Int J Med Robot; 2023 Jun; 19(3):e2506. PubMed ID: 36786383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.