These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35116317)
1. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chen H; Liu Y; Peng H; Wang R; Wang K; Li D Transl Cancer Res; 2021 Nov; 10(11):4601-4616. PubMed ID: 35116317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes. Deng HY; Luo J; Li SX; Li G; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD Dis Esophagus; 2019 Jul; 32(7):. PubMed ID: 30496378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted, Video-Assisted, and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Mederos MA; de Virgilio MJ; Shenoy R; Ye L; Toste PA; Mak SS; Booth MS; Begashaw MM; Wilson M; Gunnar W; Shekelle PG; Maggard-Gibbons M; Girgis MD JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2129228. PubMed ID: 34724556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of short-term outcomes between robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy and video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating middle thoracic esophageal cancer. Deng HY; Huang WX; Li G; Li SX; Luo J; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD Dis Esophagus; 2018 Aug; 31(8):. PubMed ID: 29538633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis. He H; Wu Q; Wang Z; Zhang Y; Chen N; Fu J; Zhang G J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 May; 13(1):52. PubMed ID: 29792203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perioperative and mid-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a retrospective propensity-matched analysis of 842 patients. Huang JS; Zhu JF; Zhong QH; Guo FL; Lin YK; Zhang ZY; Lin JB Front Oncol; 2024; 14():1447393. PubMed ID: 39257555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive, video-assisted minimally invasive, and open esophagectomy. Gong L; Jiang H; Yue J; Duan X; Tang P; Ren P; Zhao X; Liu X; Zhang X; Yu Z J Thorac Dis; 2020 Mar; 12(3):916-924. PubMed ID: 32274159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for thoracic lymph node dissection in patients with squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective comparative cohort study. Lei J; Bai Y; Qiao Z; Ma J J Thorac Dis; 2024 Mar; 16(3):2115-2124. PubMed ID: 38617764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 18,187 patients. Perry R; Barbosa JP; Perry I; Barbosa J J Robot Surg; 2024 Mar; 18(1):125. PubMed ID: 38492067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does robot-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy have superiority over thoraco-laparoscopic minimally invasive oesophagectomy in lymph node dissection? Li XK; Xu Y; Zhou H; Cong ZZ; Wu WJ; Qiang Y; Shen Y Dis Esophagus; 2021 Feb; 34(2):. PubMed ID: 32582945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus the conventional minimally invasive one: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Jin D; Yao L; Yu J; Liu R; Guo T; Yang K; Gou Y Int J Med Robot; 2019 Jun; 15(3):e1988. PubMed ID: 30737881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes between robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy and video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Zheng C; Li XK; Zhang C; Zhou H; Ji SG; Zhong JH; Xu Y; Cong ZZ; Wang GM; Wu WJ; Shen Y J Thorac Dis; 2021 Feb; 13(2):708-719. PubMed ID: 33717543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exploring the learning curve in minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review. Chan KS; Oo AM Dis Esophagus; 2023 Sep; 36(9):. PubMed ID: 36857586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer compared with video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center retrospective study. Morimoto Y; Kawakubo H; Ishikawa A; Matsuda S; Hijikata N; Ando M; Mayanagi S; Irino T; Nakamura R; Wada N; Tsuji T; Kitagawa Y Asian J Endosc Surg; 2022 Apr; 15(2):270-278. PubMed ID: 34637190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Meta-analysis. Zhang Y; Dong D; Cao Y; Huang M; Li J; Zhang J; Lin J; Sarkaria IS; Toni L; David R; He J; Li H Ann Surg; 2023 Jul; 278(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 36538615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Novel "Modified Bascule Method" for Lymphadenectomy Along the Left Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve During Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy. Oshikiri T; Takiguchi G; Urakawa N; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Kanaji S; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Nakamura T; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 28(9):4918-4927. PubMed ID: 33686596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparisons of short-term outcomes between robot-assisted, video-assisted, and open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment: a retrospective study. Wu Z; Liu J; Zhang L; Tang M; Shu W; van der Wilk BJ; Anker CJ; He Z; Wang L; Lv W; Zhu L; Hu J J Thorac Dis; 2024 Mar; 16(3):2019-2031. PubMed ID: 38617777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy. Xue M; Liu J; Lu M; Zhang H; Liu W; Tian H Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1293645. PubMed ID: 38288099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Initial introduction of robot-assisted, minimally invasive esophagectomy using the microanatomy-based concept in the upper mediastinum. Shirakawa Y; Noma K; Kunitomo T; Hashimoto M; Maeda N; Tanabe S; Sakurama K; Fujiwara T Surg Endosc; 2021 Dec; 35(12):6568-6576. PubMed ID: 33170337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incidence of Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Palsy in Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive McKeown Esophagectomy in Prone Position: A Propensity Score-Matched Study. Oshikiri T; Goto H; Horikawa M; Urakawa N; Hasegawa H; Kanaji S; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Nakamura T; Kakeji Y Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Nov; 28(12):7249-7257. PubMed ID: 34032960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]