These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3511687)
1. Token swap test of significance for serial medical data bases. Moore GW; Hutchins GM; Miller RE Am J Med; 1986 Feb; 80(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 3511687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Chi 2 tests: how useful are they in the analysis of medical research data? Osborn JF Ann Ig; 1989; 1(3-4):417-32. PubMed ID: 2483622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two-tailed significance tests for 2 × 2 contingency tables: What is the alternative? Prescott RJ Stat Med; 2019 Sep; 38(22):4264-4269. PubMed ID: 31264237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. More enlightenment on the essence of applying Fisher's Exact test when testing for statistical significance using small sample data presented in a 2 x 2 table. Kangave D West Afr J Med; 1992; 11(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 1476961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A revisit to contingency table and tests of independence: bootstrap is preferred to Chi-square approximations as well as Fisher's exact test. Lin JJ; Chang CH; Pal N J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(3):438-58. PubMed ID: 24905809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison of two or more samples of quantitative data]. Ivanković D; Tiljak MK Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():37-46. PubMed ID: 16526306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [About the different steps leading to the quality of medical information (importance of medical computing) (author's transl)]. Martin JM; Benamghar L; Martin J Sem Hop; 1979 Nov 8-15; 55(37-38):1754-60. PubMed ID: 230598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Statistics in ophthalmology revisited: the (effect) size matters. Grzybowski A; Mianowany M Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 96(7):e885-e888. PubMed ID: 30187631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biostatistics Series Module 4: Comparing Groups - Categorical Variables. Hazra A; Gogtay N Indian J Dermatol; 2016; 61(4):385-92. PubMed ID: 27512183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Unadjusted Bivariate Two-Group Comparisons: When Simpler is Better. Vetter TR; Mascha EJ Anesth Analg; 2018 Jan; 126(1):338-342. PubMed ID: 29189214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Some chi 2-tests for testing hypotheses in contingency tables]. Jesdinsky HJ Methods Inf Med; 1968 Jul; 7(3):187-200. PubMed ID: 5711236 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Substitution effects in a generalized token economy with pigeons. Andrade LF; Hackenberg TD J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Jan; 107(1):123-135. PubMed ID: 28000221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Calibrating E-values for hidden Markov models using reverse-sequence null models. Karplus K; Karchin R; Shackelford G; Hughey R Bioinformatics; 2005 Nov; 21(22):4107-15. PubMed ID: 16123115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interpretation of research data: hypothesis testing. Stolar MH Am J Hosp Pharm; 1980 Nov; 37(11):1539-45. PubMed ID: 7211860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computers and medical decision making. A new elective course in Medical Information Science. Beck JR; Caldwell JA; O'Connor GT; Neff RK Res Med Educ; 1985; 24():3-8. PubMed ID: 3914854 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [A simple data-base system of judicial autopsy records using a personal computer and a statistical study of autopsy cases for 5 years]. Adachi J; Fujiwara S; Fukunaga T; Ueno Y; Imabayashi T; Nakagawa K; Mizoi Y Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi; 1987 Oct; 41(5):442-51. PubMed ID: 3444091 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Computer-assisted online connection between a 24-hour laboratory and an intensive care unit]. Gräser W Methods Inf Med Suppl; 1976; 10():203-6. PubMed ID: 1088808 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Physician attitudes toward applications of computer data base systems. Singer J; Sacks HS; Lucente F; Chalmers TC JAMA; 1983 Mar; 249(12):1610-4. PubMed ID: 6827742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Selecting a contingency table in a population-based association study: allele frequency or positivity? Ohashi J; Tokunaga K J Hum Genet; 1999; 44(4):246-8. PubMed ID: 10429364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]